Cargando…

Who is ‘on-call’ in Australia? A new classification approach for on-call employment in future population-level studies

BACKGROUND: On-call research and guidance materials typically focus on ‘traditional’ on-call work (e.g., emergency services, healthcare). However, given the increasing prevalence of non-standard employment arrangements (e.g., gig work and casualisation), it is likely that a proportion of individuals...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sprajcer, Madeline, Appleton, Sarah L., Adams, Robert J., Gill, Tiffany K., Ferguson, Sally A., Vincent, Grace E., Paterson, Jessica L., Reynolds, Amy C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8568115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34735465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259035
_version_ 1784594365656596480
author Sprajcer, Madeline
Appleton, Sarah L.
Adams, Robert J.
Gill, Tiffany K.
Ferguson, Sally A.
Vincent, Grace E.
Paterson, Jessica L.
Reynolds, Amy C.
author_facet Sprajcer, Madeline
Appleton, Sarah L.
Adams, Robert J.
Gill, Tiffany K.
Ferguson, Sally A.
Vincent, Grace E.
Paterson, Jessica L.
Reynolds, Amy C.
author_sort Sprajcer, Madeline
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: On-call research and guidance materials typically focus on ‘traditional’ on-call work (e.g., emergency services, healthcare). However, given the increasing prevalence of non-standard employment arrangements (e.g., gig work and casualisation), it is likely that a proportion of individuals who describe themselves as being on-call are not included in current on-call literature. This study therefore aimed to describe the current sociodemographic and work characteristics of Australian on-call workers. METHODS: A survey of 2044 adults assessed sociodemographic and work arrangements. Of this population, 1057 individuals were workforce participants, who were asked to provide information regarding any on-call work they performed over the last three months, occupation type, weekly work hours, and the presence or absence of non-standard work conditions. RESULTS: Of respondents who were working, 45.5% reported working at least one day on-call in the previous month. There was a high prevalence of on-call work in younger respondents (63.1% of participants aged 18–24 years), and those who worked multiple jobs and more weekly work hours. Additionally, high prevalence rates of on-call work were reported by machinery operators, drivers, community and personal service workers, sales workers, and high-level managers. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that on-call work is more prevalent than previously recorded and is likely to refer to a broad set of employment arrangements. Current classification systems may therefore be inadequate for population-level research. A taxonomy for the classification of on-call work is proposed, incorporating traditional on-call work, gig economy work, relief, or unscheduled work, and out of hours work.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8568115
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85681152021-11-05 Who is ‘on-call’ in Australia? A new classification approach for on-call employment in future population-level studies Sprajcer, Madeline Appleton, Sarah L. Adams, Robert J. Gill, Tiffany K. Ferguson, Sally A. Vincent, Grace E. Paterson, Jessica L. Reynolds, Amy C. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: On-call research and guidance materials typically focus on ‘traditional’ on-call work (e.g., emergency services, healthcare). However, given the increasing prevalence of non-standard employment arrangements (e.g., gig work and casualisation), it is likely that a proportion of individuals who describe themselves as being on-call are not included in current on-call literature. This study therefore aimed to describe the current sociodemographic and work characteristics of Australian on-call workers. METHODS: A survey of 2044 adults assessed sociodemographic and work arrangements. Of this population, 1057 individuals were workforce participants, who were asked to provide information regarding any on-call work they performed over the last three months, occupation type, weekly work hours, and the presence or absence of non-standard work conditions. RESULTS: Of respondents who were working, 45.5% reported working at least one day on-call in the previous month. There was a high prevalence of on-call work in younger respondents (63.1% of participants aged 18–24 years), and those who worked multiple jobs and more weekly work hours. Additionally, high prevalence rates of on-call work were reported by machinery operators, drivers, community and personal service workers, sales workers, and high-level managers. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that on-call work is more prevalent than previously recorded and is likely to refer to a broad set of employment arrangements. Current classification systems may therefore be inadequate for population-level research. A taxonomy for the classification of on-call work is proposed, incorporating traditional on-call work, gig economy work, relief, or unscheduled work, and out of hours work. Public Library of Science 2021-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8568115/ /pubmed/34735465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259035 Text en © 2021 Sprajcer et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sprajcer, Madeline
Appleton, Sarah L.
Adams, Robert J.
Gill, Tiffany K.
Ferguson, Sally A.
Vincent, Grace E.
Paterson, Jessica L.
Reynolds, Amy C.
Who is ‘on-call’ in Australia? A new classification approach for on-call employment in future population-level studies
title Who is ‘on-call’ in Australia? A new classification approach for on-call employment in future population-level studies
title_full Who is ‘on-call’ in Australia? A new classification approach for on-call employment in future population-level studies
title_fullStr Who is ‘on-call’ in Australia? A new classification approach for on-call employment in future population-level studies
title_full_unstemmed Who is ‘on-call’ in Australia? A new classification approach for on-call employment in future population-level studies
title_short Who is ‘on-call’ in Australia? A new classification approach for on-call employment in future population-level studies
title_sort who is ‘on-call’ in australia? a new classification approach for on-call employment in future population-level studies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8568115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34735465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259035
work_keys_str_mv AT sprajcermadeline whoisoncallinaustraliaanewclassificationapproachforoncallemploymentinfuturepopulationlevelstudies
AT appletonsarahl whoisoncallinaustraliaanewclassificationapproachforoncallemploymentinfuturepopulationlevelstudies
AT adamsrobertj whoisoncallinaustraliaanewclassificationapproachforoncallemploymentinfuturepopulationlevelstudies
AT gilltiffanyk whoisoncallinaustraliaanewclassificationapproachforoncallemploymentinfuturepopulationlevelstudies
AT fergusonsallya whoisoncallinaustraliaanewclassificationapproachforoncallemploymentinfuturepopulationlevelstudies
AT vincentgracee whoisoncallinaustraliaanewclassificationapproachforoncallemploymentinfuturepopulationlevelstudies
AT patersonjessical whoisoncallinaustraliaanewclassificationapproachforoncallemploymentinfuturepopulationlevelstudies
AT reynoldsamyc whoisoncallinaustraliaanewclassificationapproachforoncallemploymentinfuturepopulationlevelstudies