Cargando…
Who is ‘on-call’ in Australia? A new classification approach for on-call employment in future population-level studies
BACKGROUND: On-call research and guidance materials typically focus on ‘traditional’ on-call work (e.g., emergency services, healthcare). However, given the increasing prevalence of non-standard employment arrangements (e.g., gig work and casualisation), it is likely that a proportion of individuals...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8568115/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34735465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259035 |
_version_ | 1784594365656596480 |
---|---|
author | Sprajcer, Madeline Appleton, Sarah L. Adams, Robert J. Gill, Tiffany K. Ferguson, Sally A. Vincent, Grace E. Paterson, Jessica L. Reynolds, Amy C. |
author_facet | Sprajcer, Madeline Appleton, Sarah L. Adams, Robert J. Gill, Tiffany K. Ferguson, Sally A. Vincent, Grace E. Paterson, Jessica L. Reynolds, Amy C. |
author_sort | Sprajcer, Madeline |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: On-call research and guidance materials typically focus on ‘traditional’ on-call work (e.g., emergency services, healthcare). However, given the increasing prevalence of non-standard employment arrangements (e.g., gig work and casualisation), it is likely that a proportion of individuals who describe themselves as being on-call are not included in current on-call literature. This study therefore aimed to describe the current sociodemographic and work characteristics of Australian on-call workers. METHODS: A survey of 2044 adults assessed sociodemographic and work arrangements. Of this population, 1057 individuals were workforce participants, who were asked to provide information regarding any on-call work they performed over the last three months, occupation type, weekly work hours, and the presence or absence of non-standard work conditions. RESULTS: Of respondents who were working, 45.5% reported working at least one day on-call in the previous month. There was a high prevalence of on-call work in younger respondents (63.1% of participants aged 18–24 years), and those who worked multiple jobs and more weekly work hours. Additionally, high prevalence rates of on-call work were reported by machinery operators, drivers, community and personal service workers, sales workers, and high-level managers. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that on-call work is more prevalent than previously recorded and is likely to refer to a broad set of employment arrangements. Current classification systems may therefore be inadequate for population-level research. A taxonomy for the classification of on-call work is proposed, incorporating traditional on-call work, gig economy work, relief, or unscheduled work, and out of hours work. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8568115 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85681152021-11-05 Who is ‘on-call’ in Australia? A new classification approach for on-call employment in future population-level studies Sprajcer, Madeline Appleton, Sarah L. Adams, Robert J. Gill, Tiffany K. Ferguson, Sally A. Vincent, Grace E. Paterson, Jessica L. Reynolds, Amy C. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: On-call research and guidance materials typically focus on ‘traditional’ on-call work (e.g., emergency services, healthcare). However, given the increasing prevalence of non-standard employment arrangements (e.g., gig work and casualisation), it is likely that a proportion of individuals who describe themselves as being on-call are not included in current on-call literature. This study therefore aimed to describe the current sociodemographic and work characteristics of Australian on-call workers. METHODS: A survey of 2044 adults assessed sociodemographic and work arrangements. Of this population, 1057 individuals were workforce participants, who were asked to provide information regarding any on-call work they performed over the last three months, occupation type, weekly work hours, and the presence or absence of non-standard work conditions. RESULTS: Of respondents who were working, 45.5% reported working at least one day on-call in the previous month. There was a high prevalence of on-call work in younger respondents (63.1% of participants aged 18–24 years), and those who worked multiple jobs and more weekly work hours. Additionally, high prevalence rates of on-call work were reported by machinery operators, drivers, community and personal service workers, sales workers, and high-level managers. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that on-call work is more prevalent than previously recorded and is likely to refer to a broad set of employment arrangements. Current classification systems may therefore be inadequate for population-level research. A taxonomy for the classification of on-call work is proposed, incorporating traditional on-call work, gig economy work, relief, or unscheduled work, and out of hours work. Public Library of Science 2021-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8568115/ /pubmed/34735465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259035 Text en © 2021 Sprajcer et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sprajcer, Madeline Appleton, Sarah L. Adams, Robert J. Gill, Tiffany K. Ferguson, Sally A. Vincent, Grace E. Paterson, Jessica L. Reynolds, Amy C. Who is ‘on-call’ in Australia? A new classification approach for on-call employment in future population-level studies |
title | Who is ‘on-call’ in Australia? A new classification approach for on-call employment in future population-level studies |
title_full | Who is ‘on-call’ in Australia? A new classification approach for on-call employment in future population-level studies |
title_fullStr | Who is ‘on-call’ in Australia? A new classification approach for on-call employment in future population-level studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Who is ‘on-call’ in Australia? A new classification approach for on-call employment in future population-level studies |
title_short | Who is ‘on-call’ in Australia? A new classification approach for on-call employment in future population-level studies |
title_sort | who is ‘on-call’ in australia? a new classification approach for on-call employment in future population-level studies |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8568115/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34735465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259035 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sprajcermadeline whoisoncallinaustraliaanewclassificationapproachforoncallemploymentinfuturepopulationlevelstudies AT appletonsarahl whoisoncallinaustraliaanewclassificationapproachforoncallemploymentinfuturepopulationlevelstudies AT adamsrobertj whoisoncallinaustraliaanewclassificationapproachforoncallemploymentinfuturepopulationlevelstudies AT gilltiffanyk whoisoncallinaustraliaanewclassificationapproachforoncallemploymentinfuturepopulationlevelstudies AT fergusonsallya whoisoncallinaustraliaanewclassificationapproachforoncallemploymentinfuturepopulationlevelstudies AT vincentgracee whoisoncallinaustraliaanewclassificationapproachforoncallemploymentinfuturepopulationlevelstudies AT patersonjessical whoisoncallinaustraliaanewclassificationapproachforoncallemploymentinfuturepopulationlevelstudies AT reynoldsamyc whoisoncallinaustraliaanewclassificationapproachforoncallemploymentinfuturepopulationlevelstudies |