Cargando…
Brucellosis and its associated risk factors to humans and domestic ruminants in Kagera Ecosystem, Tanzania
BACKGROUND: Brucellosis is an important disease for both veterinary and public health. A study was conducted to understand the seroprevalence of brucellosis and its associated risk factors in pastoral areas of Kagera, Tanzania. METHODS: Sera from 156 patients with malaria-like symptoms were analyzed...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Makerere Medical School
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8568260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34795704 http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v21i2.6 |
_version_ | 1784594401054425088 |
---|---|
author | Ntirandekura, Jean Bosco Matemba, Lucas Eliaimringi Kimera, Sharadhuli Iddi Muma, John Bwayla Karimuribo, Esron Daniel |
author_facet | Ntirandekura, Jean Bosco Matemba, Lucas Eliaimringi Kimera, Sharadhuli Iddi Muma, John Bwayla Karimuribo, Esron Daniel |
author_sort | Ntirandekura, Jean Bosco |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Brucellosis is an important disease for both veterinary and public health. A study was conducted to understand the seroprevalence of brucellosis and its associated risk factors in pastoral areas of Kagera, Tanzania. METHODS: Sera from 156 patients with malaria-like symptoms were analyzed using the commercial rapid agglutination test (specific for B.abortus and B.melitensis detection) and Fluorescence Polarization Assay (FPA). Sera from 426 cattle, 206 goats and 197 sheep were analyzed using Rose Bengal Plate (RBPT) and Competitive ELISA (c-ELISA) tests. RESULTS: In humans, overall brucellosis, B. abortus, and B. melitensis sero-prevalences were 7.7% (95%CI: 3.8–12.2%), 1.9% (95% CI: 0.4–4.5%), and 5.8 % (95%CI: 2.6–10.6%), respectively. At animal level, seropositivity was 5.9% (95%CI: 4.0–8.6%), 2.5% (95%CI: 0.8–5.7%) and 0.5% (95%CI: 0.01–2.8%) in cattle, goats and sheep, respectively. At herd level, seropositivity was 18.2% (95%CI: 12.0–25.8%) in cattle and 6.9% (95%CI: 2.2–15.3%) in small ruminants. Brucellosis was associated with assisting in parturition without wearing protective gears (OR= 5.6; p= 0.02) in humans, herds of 50–200 animals (OR= 4.2, p= 0.01) and cattle (OR=3.5; p=0.01). The knowledge of brucellosis among pastoralists (OR=0.1; p<0.01) was a protective factor. CONCLUSION: Brucella infections could be occurring in pastoralists and domestic ruminants in Kagera. Community health education is necessary for the control of brucellosis in Tanzania. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8568260 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Makerere Medical School |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85682602021-11-17 Brucellosis and its associated risk factors to humans and domestic ruminants in Kagera Ecosystem, Tanzania Ntirandekura, Jean Bosco Matemba, Lucas Eliaimringi Kimera, Sharadhuli Iddi Muma, John Bwayla Karimuribo, Esron Daniel Afr Health Sci Articles BACKGROUND: Brucellosis is an important disease for both veterinary and public health. A study was conducted to understand the seroprevalence of brucellosis and its associated risk factors in pastoral areas of Kagera, Tanzania. METHODS: Sera from 156 patients with malaria-like symptoms were analyzed using the commercial rapid agglutination test (specific for B.abortus and B.melitensis detection) and Fluorescence Polarization Assay (FPA). Sera from 426 cattle, 206 goats and 197 sheep were analyzed using Rose Bengal Plate (RBPT) and Competitive ELISA (c-ELISA) tests. RESULTS: In humans, overall brucellosis, B. abortus, and B. melitensis sero-prevalences were 7.7% (95%CI: 3.8–12.2%), 1.9% (95% CI: 0.4–4.5%), and 5.8 % (95%CI: 2.6–10.6%), respectively. At animal level, seropositivity was 5.9% (95%CI: 4.0–8.6%), 2.5% (95%CI: 0.8–5.7%) and 0.5% (95%CI: 0.01–2.8%) in cattle, goats and sheep, respectively. At herd level, seropositivity was 18.2% (95%CI: 12.0–25.8%) in cattle and 6.9% (95%CI: 2.2–15.3%) in small ruminants. Brucellosis was associated with assisting in parturition without wearing protective gears (OR= 5.6; p= 0.02) in humans, herds of 50–200 animals (OR= 4.2, p= 0.01) and cattle (OR=3.5; p=0.01). The knowledge of brucellosis among pastoralists (OR=0.1; p<0.01) was a protective factor. CONCLUSION: Brucella infections could be occurring in pastoralists and domestic ruminants in Kagera. Community health education is necessary for the control of brucellosis in Tanzania. Makerere Medical School 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8568260/ /pubmed/34795704 http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v21i2.6 Text en © 2021 Ntirandekura JB et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee African Health Sciences. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Articles Ntirandekura, Jean Bosco Matemba, Lucas Eliaimringi Kimera, Sharadhuli Iddi Muma, John Bwayla Karimuribo, Esron Daniel Brucellosis and its associated risk factors to humans and domestic ruminants in Kagera Ecosystem, Tanzania |
title | Brucellosis and its associated risk factors to humans and domestic ruminants in Kagera Ecosystem, Tanzania |
title_full | Brucellosis and its associated risk factors to humans and domestic ruminants in Kagera Ecosystem, Tanzania |
title_fullStr | Brucellosis and its associated risk factors to humans and domestic ruminants in Kagera Ecosystem, Tanzania |
title_full_unstemmed | Brucellosis and its associated risk factors to humans and domestic ruminants in Kagera Ecosystem, Tanzania |
title_short | Brucellosis and its associated risk factors to humans and domestic ruminants in Kagera Ecosystem, Tanzania |
title_sort | brucellosis and its associated risk factors to humans and domestic ruminants in kagera ecosystem, tanzania |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8568260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34795704 http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v21i2.6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ntirandekurajeanbosco brucellosisanditsassociatedriskfactorstohumansanddomesticruminantsinkageraecosystemtanzania AT matembalucaseliaimringi brucellosisanditsassociatedriskfactorstohumansanddomesticruminantsinkageraecosystemtanzania AT kimerasharadhuliiddi brucellosisanditsassociatedriskfactorstohumansanddomesticruminantsinkageraecosystemtanzania AT mumajohnbwayla brucellosisanditsassociatedriskfactorstohumansanddomesticruminantsinkageraecosystemtanzania AT karimuriboesrondaniel brucellosisanditsassociatedriskfactorstohumansanddomesticruminantsinkageraecosystemtanzania |