Cargando…

Brucellosis and its associated risk factors to humans and domestic ruminants in Kagera Ecosystem, Tanzania

BACKGROUND: Brucellosis is an important disease for both veterinary and public health. A study was conducted to understand the seroprevalence of brucellosis and its associated risk factors in pastoral areas of Kagera, Tanzania. METHODS: Sera from 156 patients with malaria-like symptoms were analyzed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ntirandekura, Jean Bosco, Matemba, Lucas Eliaimringi, Kimera, Sharadhuli Iddi, Muma, John Bwayla, Karimuribo, Esron Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Makerere Medical School 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8568260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34795704
http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v21i2.6
_version_ 1784594401054425088
author Ntirandekura, Jean Bosco
Matemba, Lucas Eliaimringi
Kimera, Sharadhuli Iddi
Muma, John Bwayla
Karimuribo, Esron Daniel
author_facet Ntirandekura, Jean Bosco
Matemba, Lucas Eliaimringi
Kimera, Sharadhuli Iddi
Muma, John Bwayla
Karimuribo, Esron Daniel
author_sort Ntirandekura, Jean Bosco
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Brucellosis is an important disease for both veterinary and public health. A study was conducted to understand the seroprevalence of brucellosis and its associated risk factors in pastoral areas of Kagera, Tanzania. METHODS: Sera from 156 patients with malaria-like symptoms were analyzed using the commercial rapid agglutination test (specific for B.abortus and B.melitensis detection) and Fluorescence Polarization Assay (FPA). Sera from 426 cattle, 206 goats and 197 sheep were analyzed using Rose Bengal Plate (RBPT) and Competitive ELISA (c-ELISA) tests. RESULTS: In humans, overall brucellosis, B. abortus, and B. melitensis sero-prevalences were 7.7% (95%CI: 3.8–12.2%), 1.9% (95% CI: 0.4–4.5%), and 5.8 % (95%CI: 2.6–10.6%), respectively. At animal level, seropositivity was 5.9% (95%CI: 4.0–8.6%), 2.5% (95%CI: 0.8–5.7%) and 0.5% (95%CI: 0.01–2.8%) in cattle, goats and sheep, respectively. At herd level, seropositivity was 18.2% (95%CI: 12.0–25.8%) in cattle and 6.9% (95%CI: 2.2–15.3%) in small ruminants. Brucellosis was associated with assisting in parturition without wearing protective gears (OR= 5.6; p= 0.02) in humans, herds of 50–200 animals (OR= 4.2, p= 0.01) and cattle (OR=3.5; p=0.01). The knowledge of brucellosis among pastoralists (OR=0.1; p<0.01) was a protective factor. CONCLUSION: Brucella infections could be occurring in pastoralists and domestic ruminants in Kagera. Community health education is necessary for the control of brucellosis in Tanzania.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8568260
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Makerere Medical School
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85682602021-11-17 Brucellosis and its associated risk factors to humans and domestic ruminants in Kagera Ecosystem, Tanzania Ntirandekura, Jean Bosco Matemba, Lucas Eliaimringi Kimera, Sharadhuli Iddi Muma, John Bwayla Karimuribo, Esron Daniel Afr Health Sci Articles BACKGROUND: Brucellosis is an important disease for both veterinary and public health. A study was conducted to understand the seroprevalence of brucellosis and its associated risk factors in pastoral areas of Kagera, Tanzania. METHODS: Sera from 156 patients with malaria-like symptoms were analyzed using the commercial rapid agglutination test (specific for B.abortus and B.melitensis detection) and Fluorescence Polarization Assay (FPA). Sera from 426 cattle, 206 goats and 197 sheep were analyzed using Rose Bengal Plate (RBPT) and Competitive ELISA (c-ELISA) tests. RESULTS: In humans, overall brucellosis, B. abortus, and B. melitensis sero-prevalences were 7.7% (95%CI: 3.8–12.2%), 1.9% (95% CI: 0.4–4.5%), and 5.8 % (95%CI: 2.6–10.6%), respectively. At animal level, seropositivity was 5.9% (95%CI: 4.0–8.6%), 2.5% (95%CI: 0.8–5.7%) and 0.5% (95%CI: 0.01–2.8%) in cattle, goats and sheep, respectively. At herd level, seropositivity was 18.2% (95%CI: 12.0–25.8%) in cattle and 6.9% (95%CI: 2.2–15.3%) in small ruminants. Brucellosis was associated with assisting in parturition without wearing protective gears (OR= 5.6; p= 0.02) in humans, herds of 50–200 animals (OR= 4.2, p= 0.01) and cattle (OR=3.5; p=0.01). The knowledge of brucellosis among pastoralists (OR=0.1; p<0.01) was a protective factor. CONCLUSION: Brucella infections could be occurring in pastoralists and domestic ruminants in Kagera. Community health education is necessary for the control of brucellosis in Tanzania. Makerere Medical School 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8568260/ /pubmed/34795704 http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v21i2.6 Text en © 2021 Ntirandekura JB et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee African Health Sciences. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Ntirandekura, Jean Bosco
Matemba, Lucas Eliaimringi
Kimera, Sharadhuli Iddi
Muma, John Bwayla
Karimuribo, Esron Daniel
Brucellosis and its associated risk factors to humans and domestic ruminants in Kagera Ecosystem, Tanzania
title Brucellosis and its associated risk factors to humans and domestic ruminants in Kagera Ecosystem, Tanzania
title_full Brucellosis and its associated risk factors to humans and domestic ruminants in Kagera Ecosystem, Tanzania
title_fullStr Brucellosis and its associated risk factors to humans and domestic ruminants in Kagera Ecosystem, Tanzania
title_full_unstemmed Brucellosis and its associated risk factors to humans and domestic ruminants in Kagera Ecosystem, Tanzania
title_short Brucellosis and its associated risk factors to humans and domestic ruminants in Kagera Ecosystem, Tanzania
title_sort brucellosis and its associated risk factors to humans and domestic ruminants in kagera ecosystem, tanzania
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8568260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34795704
http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v21i2.6
work_keys_str_mv AT ntirandekurajeanbosco brucellosisanditsassociatedriskfactorstohumansanddomesticruminantsinkageraecosystemtanzania
AT matembalucaseliaimringi brucellosisanditsassociatedriskfactorstohumansanddomesticruminantsinkageraecosystemtanzania
AT kimerasharadhuliiddi brucellosisanditsassociatedriskfactorstohumansanddomesticruminantsinkageraecosystemtanzania
AT mumajohnbwayla brucellosisanditsassociatedriskfactorstohumansanddomesticruminantsinkageraecosystemtanzania
AT karimuriboesrondaniel brucellosisanditsassociatedriskfactorstohumansanddomesticruminantsinkageraecosystemtanzania