Cargando…

Multiparametric prostate MRI quality assessment using a semi-automated PI-QUAL software program

The technical requirements for the acquisition of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate have been clearly outlined in the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) guidelines, but there is still huge variability in image quality among centres across the world....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giganti, Francesco, Lindner, Sydney, Piper, Jonathan W., Kasivisvanathan, Veeru, Emberton, Mark, Moore, Caroline M., Allen, Clare
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8568748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34738219
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-021-00245-x
_version_ 1784594496915243008
author Giganti, Francesco
Lindner, Sydney
Piper, Jonathan W.
Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
Emberton, Mark
Moore, Caroline M.
Allen, Clare
author_facet Giganti, Francesco
Lindner, Sydney
Piper, Jonathan W.
Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
Emberton, Mark
Moore, Caroline M.
Allen, Clare
author_sort Giganti, Francesco
collection PubMed
description The technical requirements for the acquisition of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate have been clearly outlined in the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) guidelines, but there is still huge variability in image quality among centres across the world. It has been difficult to quantify what constitutes a good-quality image, and a first attempt to address this matter has been the publication of the Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL) score and its dedicated scoring sheet. This score includes the assessment of technical parameters that can be obtained from the DICOM files along with a visual evaluation of certain features on prostate MRI (e.g., anatomical structures). We retrospectively analysed the image quality of 10 scans from different vendors and magnets using a semiautomated dedicated PI-QUAL software program and compared the time needed for assessing image quality using two methods (semiautomated assessment versus manual filling of the scoring sheet). This semiautomated software is able to assess the technical parameters automatically, but the visual assessment is still performed by the radiologist. There was a significant reduction in the reporting time of prostate mpMRI quality according to PI-QUAL using the dedicated software program compared to manual filling (5′54″ versus 7′59″; p = 0.005). A semiautomated PI-QUAL software program allows the radiologist to assess the technical details related to the image quality of prostate mpMRI in a quick and reliable manner, allowing clinicians to have more confidence that the quality of mpMRI of the prostate is sufficient to determine patient care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8568748
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85687482021-11-15 Multiparametric prostate MRI quality assessment using a semi-automated PI-QUAL software program Giganti, Francesco Lindner, Sydney Piper, Jonathan W. Kasivisvanathan, Veeru Emberton, Mark Moore, Caroline M. Allen, Clare Eur Radiol Exp Technical Note The technical requirements for the acquisition of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate have been clearly outlined in the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) guidelines, but there is still huge variability in image quality among centres across the world. It has been difficult to quantify what constitutes a good-quality image, and a first attempt to address this matter has been the publication of the Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL) score and its dedicated scoring sheet. This score includes the assessment of technical parameters that can be obtained from the DICOM files along with a visual evaluation of certain features on prostate MRI (e.g., anatomical structures). We retrospectively analysed the image quality of 10 scans from different vendors and magnets using a semiautomated dedicated PI-QUAL software program and compared the time needed for assessing image quality using two methods (semiautomated assessment versus manual filling of the scoring sheet). This semiautomated software is able to assess the technical parameters automatically, but the visual assessment is still performed by the radiologist. There was a significant reduction in the reporting time of prostate mpMRI quality according to PI-QUAL using the dedicated software program compared to manual filling (5′54″ versus 7′59″; p = 0.005). A semiautomated PI-QUAL software program allows the radiologist to assess the technical details related to the image quality of prostate mpMRI in a quick and reliable manner, allowing clinicians to have more confidence that the quality of mpMRI of the prostate is sufficient to determine patient care. Springer International Publishing 2021-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8568748/ /pubmed/34738219 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-021-00245-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Technical Note
Giganti, Francesco
Lindner, Sydney
Piper, Jonathan W.
Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
Emberton, Mark
Moore, Caroline M.
Allen, Clare
Multiparametric prostate MRI quality assessment using a semi-automated PI-QUAL software program
title Multiparametric prostate MRI quality assessment using a semi-automated PI-QUAL software program
title_full Multiparametric prostate MRI quality assessment using a semi-automated PI-QUAL software program
title_fullStr Multiparametric prostate MRI quality assessment using a semi-automated PI-QUAL software program
title_full_unstemmed Multiparametric prostate MRI quality assessment using a semi-automated PI-QUAL software program
title_short Multiparametric prostate MRI quality assessment using a semi-automated PI-QUAL software program
title_sort multiparametric prostate mri quality assessment using a semi-automated pi-qual software program
topic Technical Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8568748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34738219
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-021-00245-x
work_keys_str_mv AT gigantifrancesco multiparametricprostatemriqualityassessmentusingasemiautomatedpiqualsoftwareprogram
AT lindnersydney multiparametricprostatemriqualityassessmentusingasemiautomatedpiqualsoftwareprogram
AT piperjonathanw multiparametricprostatemriqualityassessmentusingasemiautomatedpiqualsoftwareprogram
AT kasivisvanathanveeru multiparametricprostatemriqualityassessmentusingasemiautomatedpiqualsoftwareprogram
AT embertonmark multiparametricprostatemriqualityassessmentusingasemiautomatedpiqualsoftwareprogram
AT moorecarolinem multiparametricprostatemriqualityassessmentusingasemiautomatedpiqualsoftwareprogram
AT allenclare multiparametricprostatemriqualityassessmentusingasemiautomatedpiqualsoftwareprogram