Cargando…
Multiparametric prostate MRI quality assessment using a semi-automated PI-QUAL software program
The technical requirements for the acquisition of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate have been clearly outlined in the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) guidelines, but there is still huge variability in image quality among centres across the world....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8568748/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34738219 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-021-00245-x |
_version_ | 1784594496915243008 |
---|---|
author | Giganti, Francesco Lindner, Sydney Piper, Jonathan W. Kasivisvanathan, Veeru Emberton, Mark Moore, Caroline M. Allen, Clare |
author_facet | Giganti, Francesco Lindner, Sydney Piper, Jonathan W. Kasivisvanathan, Veeru Emberton, Mark Moore, Caroline M. Allen, Clare |
author_sort | Giganti, Francesco |
collection | PubMed |
description | The technical requirements for the acquisition of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate have been clearly outlined in the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) guidelines, but there is still huge variability in image quality among centres across the world. It has been difficult to quantify what constitutes a good-quality image, and a first attempt to address this matter has been the publication of the Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL) score and its dedicated scoring sheet. This score includes the assessment of technical parameters that can be obtained from the DICOM files along with a visual evaluation of certain features on prostate MRI (e.g., anatomical structures). We retrospectively analysed the image quality of 10 scans from different vendors and magnets using a semiautomated dedicated PI-QUAL software program and compared the time needed for assessing image quality using two methods (semiautomated assessment versus manual filling of the scoring sheet). This semiautomated software is able to assess the technical parameters automatically, but the visual assessment is still performed by the radiologist. There was a significant reduction in the reporting time of prostate mpMRI quality according to PI-QUAL using the dedicated software program compared to manual filling (5′54″ versus 7′59″; p = 0.005). A semiautomated PI-QUAL software program allows the radiologist to assess the technical details related to the image quality of prostate mpMRI in a quick and reliable manner, allowing clinicians to have more confidence that the quality of mpMRI of the prostate is sufficient to determine patient care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8568748 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85687482021-11-15 Multiparametric prostate MRI quality assessment using a semi-automated PI-QUAL software program Giganti, Francesco Lindner, Sydney Piper, Jonathan W. Kasivisvanathan, Veeru Emberton, Mark Moore, Caroline M. Allen, Clare Eur Radiol Exp Technical Note The technical requirements for the acquisition of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate have been clearly outlined in the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) guidelines, but there is still huge variability in image quality among centres across the world. It has been difficult to quantify what constitutes a good-quality image, and a first attempt to address this matter has been the publication of the Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL) score and its dedicated scoring sheet. This score includes the assessment of technical parameters that can be obtained from the DICOM files along with a visual evaluation of certain features on prostate MRI (e.g., anatomical structures). We retrospectively analysed the image quality of 10 scans from different vendors and magnets using a semiautomated dedicated PI-QUAL software program and compared the time needed for assessing image quality using two methods (semiautomated assessment versus manual filling of the scoring sheet). This semiautomated software is able to assess the technical parameters automatically, but the visual assessment is still performed by the radiologist. There was a significant reduction in the reporting time of prostate mpMRI quality according to PI-QUAL using the dedicated software program compared to manual filling (5′54″ versus 7′59″; p = 0.005). A semiautomated PI-QUAL software program allows the radiologist to assess the technical details related to the image quality of prostate mpMRI in a quick and reliable manner, allowing clinicians to have more confidence that the quality of mpMRI of the prostate is sufficient to determine patient care. Springer International Publishing 2021-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8568748/ /pubmed/34738219 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-021-00245-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Technical Note Giganti, Francesco Lindner, Sydney Piper, Jonathan W. Kasivisvanathan, Veeru Emberton, Mark Moore, Caroline M. Allen, Clare Multiparametric prostate MRI quality assessment using a semi-automated PI-QUAL software program |
title | Multiparametric prostate MRI quality assessment using a semi-automated PI-QUAL software program |
title_full | Multiparametric prostate MRI quality assessment using a semi-automated PI-QUAL software program |
title_fullStr | Multiparametric prostate MRI quality assessment using a semi-automated PI-QUAL software program |
title_full_unstemmed | Multiparametric prostate MRI quality assessment using a semi-automated PI-QUAL software program |
title_short | Multiparametric prostate MRI quality assessment using a semi-automated PI-QUAL software program |
title_sort | multiparametric prostate mri quality assessment using a semi-automated pi-qual software program |
topic | Technical Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8568748/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34738219 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-021-00245-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gigantifrancesco multiparametricprostatemriqualityassessmentusingasemiautomatedpiqualsoftwareprogram AT lindnersydney multiparametricprostatemriqualityassessmentusingasemiautomatedpiqualsoftwareprogram AT piperjonathanw multiparametricprostatemriqualityassessmentusingasemiautomatedpiqualsoftwareprogram AT kasivisvanathanveeru multiparametricprostatemriqualityassessmentusingasemiautomatedpiqualsoftwareprogram AT embertonmark multiparametricprostatemriqualityassessmentusingasemiautomatedpiqualsoftwareprogram AT moorecarolinem multiparametricprostatemriqualityassessmentusingasemiautomatedpiqualsoftwareprogram AT allenclare multiparametricprostatemriqualityassessmentusingasemiautomatedpiqualsoftwareprogram |