Cargando…

Kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen unter Androgenentzugstherapie: Vorteil für Gonadotropin-Releasing-Hormon-Antagonisten? Ein Update

BACKGROUND: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plays a crucial role in treatment of advanced prostate cancer (PCa). The additional application of new drugs results in prolonged overall survival, both in the hormone sensitive and castration resistant state. Consequently, the long-term use of ADT move...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: von Amsberg, Gunhild, Thiele, Holger, Merseburger, Axel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Medizin 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8568757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34213627
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00120-021-01583-9
_version_ 1784594498916974592
author von Amsberg, Gunhild
Thiele, Holger
Merseburger, Axel
author_facet von Amsberg, Gunhild
Thiele, Holger
Merseburger, Axel
author_sort von Amsberg, Gunhild
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plays a crucial role in treatment of advanced prostate cancer (PCa). The additional application of new drugs results in prolonged overall survival, both in the hormone sensitive and castration resistant state. Consequently, the long-term use of ADT moves potential side effects into the focus of interest. In this context special consideration must be given to cardiovascular events. OBJECTIVES: Review of current evidence on potential differences regarding the cardiovascular risk profile of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists compared to GnRH antagonists. METHODS: Narrative review based on an expert consensus supported by a literature search in PubMed (MEDLINE) and the abstract databases of ASCO and ESMO was conducted for publications published between January 2015 and January 2021. Significant meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world data (RWD) revealing relevant results for clinical practice were taken into account. Selection of studies was performed based on the clinical relevance for everyday practice. RESULTS: The search yielded three relevant meta-analyses, two prospective RCTs as well as three RWD publications that are of importance for clinical practice. Overall, a decreased incidence of cardiovascular events was reported for GnRH antagonists compared to GnRH agonists. Only one RWD publication described comparable rates of complications for both drug classes. CONCLUSION: GnRH antagonists have a lower risk of treatment related cardiovascular events compared to GnRH agonists. Risks should be minimized by taking known cardiovascular risk factors into account before initiating therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8568757
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Medizin
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85687572021-11-15 Kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen unter Androgenentzugstherapie: Vorteil für Gonadotropin-Releasing-Hormon-Antagonisten? Ein Update von Amsberg, Gunhild Thiele, Holger Merseburger, Axel Urologe A Übersichten BACKGROUND: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plays a crucial role in treatment of advanced prostate cancer (PCa). The additional application of new drugs results in prolonged overall survival, both in the hormone sensitive and castration resistant state. Consequently, the long-term use of ADT moves potential side effects into the focus of interest. In this context special consideration must be given to cardiovascular events. OBJECTIVES: Review of current evidence on potential differences regarding the cardiovascular risk profile of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists compared to GnRH antagonists. METHODS: Narrative review based on an expert consensus supported by a literature search in PubMed (MEDLINE) and the abstract databases of ASCO and ESMO was conducted for publications published between January 2015 and January 2021. Significant meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world data (RWD) revealing relevant results for clinical practice were taken into account. Selection of studies was performed based on the clinical relevance for everyday practice. RESULTS: The search yielded three relevant meta-analyses, two prospective RCTs as well as three RWD publications that are of importance for clinical practice. Overall, a decreased incidence of cardiovascular events was reported for GnRH antagonists compared to GnRH agonists. Only one RWD publication described comparable rates of complications for both drug classes. CONCLUSION: GnRH antagonists have a lower risk of treatment related cardiovascular events compared to GnRH agonists. Risks should be minimized by taking known cardiovascular risk factors into account before initiating therapy. Springer Medizin 2021-07-02 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8568757/ /pubmed/34213627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00120-021-01583-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access Dieser Artikel wird unter der Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Lizenz veröffentlicht, welche die Nutzung, Vervielfältigung, Bearbeitung, Verbreitung und Wiedergabe in jeglichem Medium und Format erlaubt, sofern Sie den/die ursprünglichen Autor(en) und die Quelle ordnungsgemäß nennen, einen Link zur Creative Commons Lizenz beifügen und angeben, ob Änderungen vorgenommen wurden. Die in diesem Artikel enthaltenen Bilder und sonstiges Drittmaterial unterliegen ebenfalls der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz, sofern sich aus der Abbildungslegende nichts anderes ergibt. Sofern das betreffende Material nicht unter der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz steht und die betreffende Handlung nicht nach gesetzlichen Vorschriften erlaubt ist, ist für die oben aufgeführten Weiterverwendungen des Materials die Einwilligung des jeweiligen Rechteinhabers einzuholen. Weitere Details zur Lizenz entnehmen Sie bitte der Lizenzinformation auf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Übersichten
von Amsberg, Gunhild
Thiele, Holger
Merseburger, Axel
Kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen unter Androgenentzugstherapie: Vorteil für Gonadotropin-Releasing-Hormon-Antagonisten? Ein Update
title Kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen unter Androgenentzugstherapie: Vorteil für Gonadotropin-Releasing-Hormon-Antagonisten? Ein Update
title_full Kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen unter Androgenentzugstherapie: Vorteil für Gonadotropin-Releasing-Hormon-Antagonisten? Ein Update
title_fullStr Kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen unter Androgenentzugstherapie: Vorteil für Gonadotropin-Releasing-Hormon-Antagonisten? Ein Update
title_full_unstemmed Kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen unter Androgenentzugstherapie: Vorteil für Gonadotropin-Releasing-Hormon-Antagonisten? Ein Update
title_short Kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen unter Androgenentzugstherapie: Vorteil für Gonadotropin-Releasing-Hormon-Antagonisten? Ein Update
title_sort kardiovaskuläre komplikationen unter androgenentzugstherapie: vorteil für gonadotropin-releasing-hormon-antagonisten? ein update
topic Übersichten
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8568757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34213627
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00120-021-01583-9
work_keys_str_mv AT vonamsberggunhild kardiovaskularekomplikationenunterandrogenentzugstherapievorteilfurgonadotropinreleasinghormonantagonisteneinupdate
AT thieleholger kardiovaskularekomplikationenunterandrogenentzugstherapievorteilfurgonadotropinreleasinghormonantagonisteneinupdate
AT merseburgeraxel kardiovaskularekomplikationenunterandrogenentzugstherapievorteilfurgonadotropinreleasinghormonantagonisteneinupdate