Cargando…

The minimal clinically important difference of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function and upper extremity computer adaptive tests and QuickDASH in the setting of elbow trauma

BACKGROUND: Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) estimates are useful for gauging clinical relevance when interpreting changes or differences in patient-reported outcomes scores. These values are lacking in the setting of elbow trauma. Our primary purpose was to estimate the MCID of the Pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Randall, Dustin J., Zhang, Yue, Harris, Andrew P., Qiu, Yuqing, Li, Haojia, Stephens, Andrew R., Kazmers, Nikolas H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8568814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34766096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2021.06.005
_version_ 1784594509821116416
author Randall, Dustin J.
Zhang, Yue
Harris, Andrew P.
Qiu, Yuqing
Li, Haojia
Stephens, Andrew R.
Kazmers, Nikolas H.
author_facet Randall, Dustin J.
Zhang, Yue
Harris, Andrew P.
Qiu, Yuqing
Li, Haojia
Stephens, Andrew R.
Kazmers, Nikolas H.
author_sort Randall, Dustin J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) estimates are useful for gauging clinical relevance when interpreting changes or differences in patient-reported outcomes scores. These values are lacking in the setting of elbow trauma. Our primary purpose was to estimate the MCID of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function (PF) computer adaptive test (CAT), the PROMIS upper extremity (UE) CAT, and the QuickDASH using an anchor-based approach for patients recovering from elbow trauma and related surgeries. Secondarily, we aimed to estimate the MCID using the 1/2 standard deviation method. MATERIALS & METHODS: Adult patients undergoing treatment for isolated elbow injuries between July 2014 and April 2020 were identified at a single tertiary academic medical center. Outcomes, including the PROMIS PF CAT v1.2/2.0, PROMIS UE CAT v1.2, and QuickDASH, were collected via a tablet computer. For inclusion, baseline (6 months before injury up to 11 days postoperatively or after injury) and follow-up (11 to 150 days postoperative or after injury) PF or UE CAT scores were required, as well as a response to an anchor question querying improvement in physical function. The MCID was calculated using (1) an anchor-based approach using the difference in mean score change between anchor groups reporting “No change” and “Slightly Improved/Improved” and (2) the 1/2 standard deviation method. RESULTS: Of the 146 included patients, the mean age was 46 ± 18 years and 67 (46%) were women. Most patients (129 of 146 or 88%) were recovering from surgery, and the remaining 12% were recovering from nonoperatively managed fractures and/or dislocations. The mean follow-up was 157 ± 192 days. Scores for each instrument improved significantly between baseline and follow-up. Anchor-based MCID values were calculated as follows: 5.7, 4.6, and 5.3 for the PROMIS PF CAT, PROMIS UE CAT, and QuickDASH, respectively. MCID values estimated using the 1/2 standard deviation method were 4.3, 4.8, and 11.7 for the PROMIS PF CAT, PROMIS UE CAT, and QuickDASH, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of elbow trauma, we propose MCID ranges of 4.3 to 5.7 for the PROMIS PF CAT, 4.6 to 4.8 for the PROMIS UE CAT, and 5.3 to 11.7 for the QuickDASH. These values will provide a framework for clinical relevance when interpreting clinical outcomes studies, or powering clinical trials, for populations recovering from trauma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8568814
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85688142021-11-10 The minimal clinically important difference of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function and upper extremity computer adaptive tests and QuickDASH in the setting of elbow trauma Randall, Dustin J. Zhang, Yue Harris, Andrew P. Qiu, Yuqing Li, Haojia Stephens, Andrew R. Kazmers, Nikolas H. JSES Int Elbow BACKGROUND: Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) estimates are useful for gauging clinical relevance when interpreting changes or differences in patient-reported outcomes scores. These values are lacking in the setting of elbow trauma. Our primary purpose was to estimate the MCID of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function (PF) computer adaptive test (CAT), the PROMIS upper extremity (UE) CAT, and the QuickDASH using an anchor-based approach for patients recovering from elbow trauma and related surgeries. Secondarily, we aimed to estimate the MCID using the 1/2 standard deviation method. MATERIALS & METHODS: Adult patients undergoing treatment for isolated elbow injuries between July 2014 and April 2020 were identified at a single tertiary academic medical center. Outcomes, including the PROMIS PF CAT v1.2/2.0, PROMIS UE CAT v1.2, and QuickDASH, were collected via a tablet computer. For inclusion, baseline (6 months before injury up to 11 days postoperatively or after injury) and follow-up (11 to 150 days postoperative or after injury) PF or UE CAT scores were required, as well as a response to an anchor question querying improvement in physical function. The MCID was calculated using (1) an anchor-based approach using the difference in mean score change between anchor groups reporting “No change” and “Slightly Improved/Improved” and (2) the 1/2 standard deviation method. RESULTS: Of the 146 included patients, the mean age was 46 ± 18 years and 67 (46%) were women. Most patients (129 of 146 or 88%) were recovering from surgery, and the remaining 12% were recovering from nonoperatively managed fractures and/or dislocations. The mean follow-up was 157 ± 192 days. Scores for each instrument improved significantly between baseline and follow-up. Anchor-based MCID values were calculated as follows: 5.7, 4.6, and 5.3 for the PROMIS PF CAT, PROMIS UE CAT, and QuickDASH, respectively. MCID values estimated using the 1/2 standard deviation method were 4.3, 4.8, and 11.7 for the PROMIS PF CAT, PROMIS UE CAT, and QuickDASH, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of elbow trauma, we propose MCID ranges of 4.3 to 5.7 for the PROMIS PF CAT, 4.6 to 4.8 for the PROMIS UE CAT, and 5.3 to 11.7 for the QuickDASH. These values will provide a framework for clinical relevance when interpreting clinical outcomes studies, or powering clinical trials, for populations recovering from trauma. Elsevier 2021-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8568814/ /pubmed/34766096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2021.06.005 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Elbow
Randall, Dustin J.
Zhang, Yue
Harris, Andrew P.
Qiu, Yuqing
Li, Haojia
Stephens, Andrew R.
Kazmers, Nikolas H.
The minimal clinically important difference of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function and upper extremity computer adaptive tests and QuickDASH in the setting of elbow trauma
title The minimal clinically important difference of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function and upper extremity computer adaptive tests and QuickDASH in the setting of elbow trauma
title_full The minimal clinically important difference of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function and upper extremity computer adaptive tests and QuickDASH in the setting of elbow trauma
title_fullStr The minimal clinically important difference of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function and upper extremity computer adaptive tests and QuickDASH in the setting of elbow trauma
title_full_unstemmed The minimal clinically important difference of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function and upper extremity computer adaptive tests and QuickDASH in the setting of elbow trauma
title_short The minimal clinically important difference of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function and upper extremity computer adaptive tests and QuickDASH in the setting of elbow trauma
title_sort minimal clinically important difference of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (promis) physical function and upper extremity computer adaptive tests and quickdash in the setting of elbow trauma
topic Elbow
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8568814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34766096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2021.06.005
work_keys_str_mv AT randalldustinj theminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceofthepatientreportedoutcomesmeasurementinformationsystempromisphysicalfunctionandupperextremitycomputeradaptivetestsandquickdashinthesettingofelbowtrauma
AT zhangyue theminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceofthepatientreportedoutcomesmeasurementinformationsystempromisphysicalfunctionandupperextremitycomputeradaptivetestsandquickdashinthesettingofelbowtrauma
AT harrisandrewp theminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceofthepatientreportedoutcomesmeasurementinformationsystempromisphysicalfunctionandupperextremitycomputeradaptivetestsandquickdashinthesettingofelbowtrauma
AT qiuyuqing theminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceofthepatientreportedoutcomesmeasurementinformationsystempromisphysicalfunctionandupperextremitycomputeradaptivetestsandquickdashinthesettingofelbowtrauma
AT lihaojia theminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceofthepatientreportedoutcomesmeasurementinformationsystempromisphysicalfunctionandupperextremitycomputeradaptivetestsandquickdashinthesettingofelbowtrauma
AT stephensandrewr theminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceofthepatientreportedoutcomesmeasurementinformationsystempromisphysicalfunctionandupperextremitycomputeradaptivetestsandquickdashinthesettingofelbowtrauma
AT kazmersnikolash theminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceofthepatientreportedoutcomesmeasurementinformationsystempromisphysicalfunctionandupperextremitycomputeradaptivetestsandquickdashinthesettingofelbowtrauma
AT randalldustinj minimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceofthepatientreportedoutcomesmeasurementinformationsystempromisphysicalfunctionandupperextremitycomputeradaptivetestsandquickdashinthesettingofelbowtrauma
AT zhangyue minimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceofthepatientreportedoutcomesmeasurementinformationsystempromisphysicalfunctionandupperextremitycomputeradaptivetestsandquickdashinthesettingofelbowtrauma
AT harrisandrewp minimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceofthepatientreportedoutcomesmeasurementinformationsystempromisphysicalfunctionandupperextremitycomputeradaptivetestsandquickdashinthesettingofelbowtrauma
AT qiuyuqing minimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceofthepatientreportedoutcomesmeasurementinformationsystempromisphysicalfunctionandupperextremitycomputeradaptivetestsandquickdashinthesettingofelbowtrauma
AT lihaojia minimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceofthepatientreportedoutcomesmeasurementinformationsystempromisphysicalfunctionandupperextremitycomputeradaptivetestsandquickdashinthesettingofelbowtrauma
AT stephensandrewr minimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceofthepatientreportedoutcomesmeasurementinformationsystempromisphysicalfunctionandupperextremitycomputeradaptivetestsandquickdashinthesettingofelbowtrauma
AT kazmersnikolash minimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceofthepatientreportedoutcomesmeasurementinformationsystempromisphysicalfunctionandupperextremitycomputeradaptivetestsandquickdashinthesettingofelbowtrauma