Cargando…

Monolithic Endocrown Vs. Hybrid Intraradicular Post/Core/Crown Restorations for Endodontically Treated Teeth; Cross-sectional Study

The gold standard for restoring Endodontically Treated Teeth (ETT) with successful clinical longevity requires having minimal invasive preparations and maximal tissue conservation. Many dentists still consider hybrid post/core/crown to be the first choice for restoring ETT. Endocrown is a viable alt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soliman, Mai, Alshamrani, Lamar, Yahya, Basma, Alajlan, Ghadah, Aldegheishem, Alhanoof, Eldwakhly, Elzahraa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8568831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34764768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.07.020
_version_ 1784594513862328320
author Soliman, Mai
Alshamrani, Lamar
Yahya, Basma
Alajlan, Ghadah
Aldegheishem, Alhanoof
Eldwakhly, Elzahraa
author_facet Soliman, Mai
Alshamrani, Lamar
Yahya, Basma
Alajlan, Ghadah
Aldegheishem, Alhanoof
Eldwakhly, Elzahraa
author_sort Soliman, Mai
collection PubMed
description The gold standard for restoring Endodontically Treated Teeth (ETT) with successful clinical longevity requires having minimal invasive preparations and maximal tissue conservation. Many dentists still consider hybrid post/core/crown to be the first choice for restoring ETT. Endocrown is a viable alternative treatment modality to hybrid post/core/crown. This study aims to assess the proper judgment of dentists working in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia on the use of monolithic endocrown versus hybrid post/core/crown for restoring ETT. The IRB of Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University (PNU) Institutional Review Board reviewed this study. The questionnaire was validated and electronically distributed. The participants were pre-informed that their responses are completely anonymous and used for professional purposes only. The questionnaire surveyed dentists working in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, about their preference for different ETT restorative modalities at various clinical scenarios. Data were analyzed using One-way ANOVA and t-test. All P-values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. A total of 275 responses were collected; 61.45% were females and 38.55% males. 56% of them were general practitioners, while 16% were consultants. Prefabricated post/core was the most preferred technique among the participants (18.55%), followed by endocrown (12.36%), and lastly, cast post/core (8.73%). The amount of remaining tooth structure was the most influential in the treatment selection (30.18%), followed by the presence or absence of 1–2 mm ferrule (17.82%). Interocclusal space (12.36%) was the least influential factor. Endocrown recorded 63.27% as the most preferred line of treatment in case of insufficient inter-occlusal space. 40.36% preferred endocrown for patients with occlusal risk factors. The amount of the remaining tooth structure and the tooth position significantly affect the treatment options of the participants. Endocrown was the most preferred treatment modality for restoring ETT for patients with occlusal consideration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8568831
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85688312021-11-10 Monolithic Endocrown Vs. Hybrid Intraradicular Post/Core/Crown Restorations for Endodontically Treated Teeth; Cross-sectional Study Soliman, Mai Alshamrani, Lamar Yahya, Basma Alajlan, Ghadah Aldegheishem, Alhanoof Eldwakhly, Elzahraa Saudi J Biol Sci Original Article The gold standard for restoring Endodontically Treated Teeth (ETT) with successful clinical longevity requires having minimal invasive preparations and maximal tissue conservation. Many dentists still consider hybrid post/core/crown to be the first choice for restoring ETT. Endocrown is a viable alternative treatment modality to hybrid post/core/crown. This study aims to assess the proper judgment of dentists working in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia on the use of monolithic endocrown versus hybrid post/core/crown for restoring ETT. The IRB of Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University (PNU) Institutional Review Board reviewed this study. The questionnaire was validated and electronically distributed. The participants were pre-informed that their responses are completely anonymous and used for professional purposes only. The questionnaire surveyed dentists working in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, about their preference for different ETT restorative modalities at various clinical scenarios. Data were analyzed using One-way ANOVA and t-test. All P-values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. A total of 275 responses were collected; 61.45% were females and 38.55% males. 56% of them were general practitioners, while 16% were consultants. Prefabricated post/core was the most preferred technique among the participants (18.55%), followed by endocrown (12.36%), and lastly, cast post/core (8.73%). The amount of remaining tooth structure was the most influential in the treatment selection (30.18%), followed by the presence or absence of 1–2 mm ferrule (17.82%). Interocclusal space (12.36%) was the least influential factor. Endocrown recorded 63.27% as the most preferred line of treatment in case of insufficient inter-occlusal space. 40.36% preferred endocrown for patients with occlusal risk factors. The amount of the remaining tooth structure and the tooth position significantly affect the treatment options of the participants. Endocrown was the most preferred treatment modality for restoring ETT for patients with occlusal consideration. Elsevier 2021-11 2021-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8568831/ /pubmed/34764768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.07.020 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Soliman, Mai
Alshamrani, Lamar
Yahya, Basma
Alajlan, Ghadah
Aldegheishem, Alhanoof
Eldwakhly, Elzahraa
Monolithic Endocrown Vs. Hybrid Intraradicular Post/Core/Crown Restorations for Endodontically Treated Teeth; Cross-sectional Study
title Monolithic Endocrown Vs. Hybrid Intraradicular Post/Core/Crown Restorations for Endodontically Treated Teeth; Cross-sectional Study
title_full Monolithic Endocrown Vs. Hybrid Intraradicular Post/Core/Crown Restorations for Endodontically Treated Teeth; Cross-sectional Study
title_fullStr Monolithic Endocrown Vs. Hybrid Intraradicular Post/Core/Crown Restorations for Endodontically Treated Teeth; Cross-sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Monolithic Endocrown Vs. Hybrid Intraradicular Post/Core/Crown Restorations for Endodontically Treated Teeth; Cross-sectional Study
title_short Monolithic Endocrown Vs. Hybrid Intraradicular Post/Core/Crown Restorations for Endodontically Treated Teeth; Cross-sectional Study
title_sort monolithic endocrown vs. hybrid intraradicular post/core/crown restorations for endodontically treated teeth; cross-sectional study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8568831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34764768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.07.020
work_keys_str_mv AT solimanmai monolithicendocrownvshybridintraradicularpostcorecrownrestorationsforendodonticallytreatedteethcrosssectionalstudy
AT alshamranilamar monolithicendocrownvshybridintraradicularpostcorecrownrestorationsforendodonticallytreatedteethcrosssectionalstudy
AT yahyabasma monolithicendocrownvshybridintraradicularpostcorecrownrestorationsforendodonticallytreatedteethcrosssectionalstudy
AT alajlanghadah monolithicendocrownvshybridintraradicularpostcorecrownrestorationsforendodonticallytreatedteethcrosssectionalstudy
AT aldegheishemalhanoof monolithicendocrownvshybridintraradicularpostcorecrownrestorationsforendodonticallytreatedteethcrosssectionalstudy
AT eldwakhlyelzahraa monolithicendocrownvshybridintraradicularpostcorecrownrestorationsforendodonticallytreatedteethcrosssectionalstudy