Cargando…

FDG-PET vs. chemical shift MR imaging in differentiating intertrabecular metastasis from hematopoietic bone marrow hyperplasia

PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility of SUVmax on FDG-PET and chemical shift imaging (CSI) on MRI in the differentiation of intertrabecular metastasis (ITM) from hematopoietic bone marrow hyperplasia (HBMH). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 54 indeterminate focal bone marrow lesions in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oki, Nozomi, Ikebe, Yohei, Koike, Hirofumi, Ideguchi, Reiko, Niino, Daisuke, Uetani, Masataka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Singapore 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8568862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34101119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11604-021-01149-x
_version_ 1784594521176145920
author Oki, Nozomi
Ikebe, Yohei
Koike, Hirofumi
Ideguchi, Reiko
Niino, Daisuke
Uetani, Masataka
author_facet Oki, Nozomi
Ikebe, Yohei
Koike, Hirofumi
Ideguchi, Reiko
Niino, Daisuke
Uetani, Masataka
author_sort Oki, Nozomi
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility of SUVmax on FDG-PET and chemical shift imaging (CSI) on MRI in the differentiation of intertrabecular metastasis (ITM) from hematopoietic bone marrow hyperplasia (HBMH). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 54 indeterminate focal bone marrow lesions in 44 patients detected on FDG-PET. The lesions were assigned to the metastasis group (M group, 29 lesions of 24 patients) and the non-metastasis group (non-M group, 25 lesions of 20 patients) based on the follow-up or the histopathological studies. The lesions were assessed with the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) on FDG-PET CT images and signal change ratio (SCR) on CSI. RESULTS: The median SUV(max) were 5.62 and 2.91; the median SCR were − 0.08 and − 34.8 in M and non-M groups respectively, with significant difference (p < 0.001). With ROC curve analysis, the optimal cutoff value of SUV(max) was 4.48 with a sensitivity of 72.4%, a specificity of 100%, and AUC of 0.905. The cutoff value of SCR was − 6.15 with a sensitivity of 82.8%, a specificity of 80%, and AUC of 0.818. CONCLUSION: FDG-PET and CSI on MRI are useful in distinguishing ITM from HBMH. Though their sensitivities are similar, the specificity of FDG-PET was higher than that of MRI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8568862
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Singapore
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85688622021-11-08 FDG-PET vs. chemical shift MR imaging in differentiating intertrabecular metastasis from hematopoietic bone marrow hyperplasia Oki, Nozomi Ikebe, Yohei Koike, Hirofumi Ideguchi, Reiko Niino, Daisuke Uetani, Masataka Jpn J Radiol Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility of SUVmax on FDG-PET and chemical shift imaging (CSI) on MRI in the differentiation of intertrabecular metastasis (ITM) from hematopoietic bone marrow hyperplasia (HBMH). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 54 indeterminate focal bone marrow lesions in 44 patients detected on FDG-PET. The lesions were assigned to the metastasis group (M group, 29 lesions of 24 patients) and the non-metastasis group (non-M group, 25 lesions of 20 patients) based on the follow-up or the histopathological studies. The lesions were assessed with the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) on FDG-PET CT images and signal change ratio (SCR) on CSI. RESULTS: The median SUV(max) were 5.62 and 2.91; the median SCR were − 0.08 and − 34.8 in M and non-M groups respectively, with significant difference (p < 0.001). With ROC curve analysis, the optimal cutoff value of SUV(max) was 4.48 with a sensitivity of 72.4%, a specificity of 100%, and AUC of 0.905. The cutoff value of SCR was − 6.15 with a sensitivity of 82.8%, a specificity of 80%, and AUC of 0.818. CONCLUSION: FDG-PET and CSI on MRI are useful in distinguishing ITM from HBMH. Though their sensitivities are similar, the specificity of FDG-PET was higher than that of MRI. Springer Singapore 2021-06-08 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8568862/ /pubmed/34101119 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11604-021-01149-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Oki, Nozomi
Ikebe, Yohei
Koike, Hirofumi
Ideguchi, Reiko
Niino, Daisuke
Uetani, Masataka
FDG-PET vs. chemical shift MR imaging in differentiating intertrabecular metastasis from hematopoietic bone marrow hyperplasia
title FDG-PET vs. chemical shift MR imaging in differentiating intertrabecular metastasis from hematopoietic bone marrow hyperplasia
title_full FDG-PET vs. chemical shift MR imaging in differentiating intertrabecular metastasis from hematopoietic bone marrow hyperplasia
title_fullStr FDG-PET vs. chemical shift MR imaging in differentiating intertrabecular metastasis from hematopoietic bone marrow hyperplasia
title_full_unstemmed FDG-PET vs. chemical shift MR imaging in differentiating intertrabecular metastasis from hematopoietic bone marrow hyperplasia
title_short FDG-PET vs. chemical shift MR imaging in differentiating intertrabecular metastasis from hematopoietic bone marrow hyperplasia
title_sort fdg-pet vs. chemical shift mr imaging in differentiating intertrabecular metastasis from hematopoietic bone marrow hyperplasia
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8568862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34101119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11604-021-01149-x
work_keys_str_mv AT okinozomi fdgpetvschemicalshiftmrimagingindifferentiatingintertrabecularmetastasisfromhematopoieticbonemarrowhyperplasia
AT ikebeyohei fdgpetvschemicalshiftmrimagingindifferentiatingintertrabecularmetastasisfromhematopoieticbonemarrowhyperplasia
AT koikehirofumi fdgpetvschemicalshiftmrimagingindifferentiatingintertrabecularmetastasisfromhematopoieticbonemarrowhyperplasia
AT ideguchireiko fdgpetvschemicalshiftmrimagingindifferentiatingintertrabecularmetastasisfromhematopoieticbonemarrowhyperplasia
AT niinodaisuke fdgpetvschemicalshiftmrimagingindifferentiatingintertrabecularmetastasisfromhematopoieticbonemarrowhyperplasia
AT uetanimasataka fdgpetvschemicalshiftmrimagingindifferentiatingintertrabecularmetastasisfromhematopoieticbonemarrowhyperplasia