Cargando…

A method to estimate probability of disease and vaccine efficacy from clinical trial immunogenicity data

Vaccine efficacy is often assessed by counting disease cases in a clinical trial. A new quantitative framework proposed here (“PoDBAY,” Probability of Disease Bayesian Analysis), estimates vaccine efficacy (and confidence interval) using immune response biomarker data collected shortly after vaccina...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dudášová, Julie, Laube, Regina, Valiathan, Chandni, Wiener, Matthew C., Gheyas, Ferdous, Fišer, Pavel, Ivanauskaite, Justina, Liu, Frank, Sachs, Jeffrey R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8568947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34737322
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41541-021-00377-6
_version_ 1784594541508034560
author Dudášová, Julie
Laube, Regina
Valiathan, Chandni
Wiener, Matthew C.
Gheyas, Ferdous
Fišer, Pavel
Ivanauskaite, Justina
Liu, Frank
Sachs, Jeffrey R.
author_facet Dudášová, Julie
Laube, Regina
Valiathan, Chandni
Wiener, Matthew C.
Gheyas, Ferdous
Fišer, Pavel
Ivanauskaite, Justina
Liu, Frank
Sachs, Jeffrey R.
author_sort Dudášová, Julie
collection PubMed
description Vaccine efficacy is often assessed by counting disease cases in a clinical trial. A new quantitative framework proposed here (“PoDBAY,” Probability of Disease Bayesian Analysis), estimates vaccine efficacy (and confidence interval) using immune response biomarker data collected shortly after vaccination. Given a biomarker associated with protection, PoDBAY describes the relationship between biomarker and probability of disease as a sigmoid probability of disease (“PoD”) curve. The PoDBAY framework is illustrated using clinical trial simulations and with data for influenza, zoster, and dengue virus vaccines. The simulations demonstrate that PoDBAY efficacy estimation (which integrates the PoD and biomarker data), can be accurate and more precise than the standard (case-count) estimation, contributing to more sensitive and specific decisions than threshold-based correlate of protection or case-count-based methods. For all three vaccine examples, the PoD fit indicates a substantial association between the biomarkers and protection, and efficacy estimated by PoDBAY from relatively little immunogenicity data is predictive of the standard estimate of efficacy, demonstrating how PoDBAY can provide early assessments of vaccine efficacy. Methods like PoDBAY can help accelerate and economize vaccine development using an immunological predictor of protection. For example, in the current effort against the COVID-19 pandemic it might provide information to help prioritize (rank) candidates both earlier in a trial and earlier in development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8568947
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85689472021-11-08 A method to estimate probability of disease and vaccine efficacy from clinical trial immunogenicity data Dudášová, Julie Laube, Regina Valiathan, Chandni Wiener, Matthew C. Gheyas, Ferdous Fišer, Pavel Ivanauskaite, Justina Liu, Frank Sachs, Jeffrey R. NPJ Vaccines Article Vaccine efficacy is often assessed by counting disease cases in a clinical trial. A new quantitative framework proposed here (“PoDBAY,” Probability of Disease Bayesian Analysis), estimates vaccine efficacy (and confidence interval) using immune response biomarker data collected shortly after vaccination. Given a biomarker associated with protection, PoDBAY describes the relationship between biomarker and probability of disease as a sigmoid probability of disease (“PoD”) curve. The PoDBAY framework is illustrated using clinical trial simulations and with data for influenza, zoster, and dengue virus vaccines. The simulations demonstrate that PoDBAY efficacy estimation (which integrates the PoD and biomarker data), can be accurate and more precise than the standard (case-count) estimation, contributing to more sensitive and specific decisions than threshold-based correlate of protection or case-count-based methods. For all three vaccine examples, the PoD fit indicates a substantial association between the biomarkers and protection, and efficacy estimated by PoDBAY from relatively little immunogenicity data is predictive of the standard estimate of efficacy, demonstrating how PoDBAY can provide early assessments of vaccine efficacy. Methods like PoDBAY can help accelerate and economize vaccine development using an immunological predictor of protection. For example, in the current effort against the COVID-19 pandemic it might provide information to help prioritize (rank) candidates both earlier in a trial and earlier in development. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8568947/ /pubmed/34737322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41541-021-00377-6 Text en © Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, N.J., U.S.A. 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Dudášová, Julie
Laube, Regina
Valiathan, Chandni
Wiener, Matthew C.
Gheyas, Ferdous
Fišer, Pavel
Ivanauskaite, Justina
Liu, Frank
Sachs, Jeffrey R.
A method to estimate probability of disease and vaccine efficacy from clinical trial immunogenicity data
title A method to estimate probability of disease and vaccine efficacy from clinical trial immunogenicity data
title_full A method to estimate probability of disease and vaccine efficacy from clinical trial immunogenicity data
title_fullStr A method to estimate probability of disease and vaccine efficacy from clinical trial immunogenicity data
title_full_unstemmed A method to estimate probability of disease and vaccine efficacy from clinical trial immunogenicity data
title_short A method to estimate probability of disease and vaccine efficacy from clinical trial immunogenicity data
title_sort method to estimate probability of disease and vaccine efficacy from clinical trial immunogenicity data
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8568947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34737322
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41541-021-00377-6
work_keys_str_mv AT dudasovajulie amethodtoestimateprobabilityofdiseaseandvaccineefficacyfromclinicaltrialimmunogenicitydata
AT lauberegina amethodtoestimateprobabilityofdiseaseandvaccineefficacyfromclinicaltrialimmunogenicitydata
AT valiathanchandni amethodtoestimateprobabilityofdiseaseandvaccineefficacyfromclinicaltrialimmunogenicitydata
AT wienermatthewc amethodtoestimateprobabilityofdiseaseandvaccineefficacyfromclinicaltrialimmunogenicitydata
AT gheyasferdous amethodtoestimateprobabilityofdiseaseandvaccineefficacyfromclinicaltrialimmunogenicitydata
AT fiserpavel amethodtoestimateprobabilityofdiseaseandvaccineefficacyfromclinicaltrialimmunogenicitydata
AT ivanauskaitejustina amethodtoestimateprobabilityofdiseaseandvaccineefficacyfromclinicaltrialimmunogenicitydata
AT liufrank amethodtoestimateprobabilityofdiseaseandvaccineefficacyfromclinicaltrialimmunogenicitydata
AT sachsjeffreyr amethodtoestimateprobabilityofdiseaseandvaccineefficacyfromclinicaltrialimmunogenicitydata
AT dudasovajulie methodtoestimateprobabilityofdiseaseandvaccineefficacyfromclinicaltrialimmunogenicitydata
AT lauberegina methodtoestimateprobabilityofdiseaseandvaccineefficacyfromclinicaltrialimmunogenicitydata
AT valiathanchandni methodtoestimateprobabilityofdiseaseandvaccineefficacyfromclinicaltrialimmunogenicitydata
AT wienermatthewc methodtoestimateprobabilityofdiseaseandvaccineefficacyfromclinicaltrialimmunogenicitydata
AT gheyasferdous methodtoestimateprobabilityofdiseaseandvaccineefficacyfromclinicaltrialimmunogenicitydata
AT fiserpavel methodtoestimateprobabilityofdiseaseandvaccineefficacyfromclinicaltrialimmunogenicitydata
AT ivanauskaitejustina methodtoestimateprobabilityofdiseaseandvaccineefficacyfromclinicaltrialimmunogenicitydata
AT liufrank methodtoestimateprobabilityofdiseaseandvaccineefficacyfromclinicaltrialimmunogenicitydata
AT sachsjeffreyr methodtoestimateprobabilityofdiseaseandvaccineefficacyfromclinicaltrialimmunogenicitydata