Cargando…

Effect of electromagnetic field on abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The increasing use of new technologies by pregnant women inevitably exposes them to the risks of the electromagnetic fields (EMFs). According to the World Health Organization, EMFs are the major sources of pollutants which harm human health. This study was aimed to evaluate the effects o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghazanfarpour, Masumeh, Kashani, Zahra Atarodi, Pakzad, Reza, Abdi, Fatemeh, Rahnemaei, Fatemeh Alsadat, Akbari, Pouran Akhavan, Roozbeh, Nasibeh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: De Gruyter 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8569282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34761114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2021-0384
_version_ 1784594616952029184
author Ghazanfarpour, Masumeh
Kashani, Zahra Atarodi
Pakzad, Reza
Abdi, Fatemeh
Rahnemaei, Fatemeh Alsadat
Akbari, Pouran Akhavan
Roozbeh, Nasibeh
author_facet Ghazanfarpour, Masumeh
Kashani, Zahra Atarodi
Pakzad, Reza
Abdi, Fatemeh
Rahnemaei, Fatemeh Alsadat
Akbari, Pouran Akhavan
Roozbeh, Nasibeh
author_sort Ghazanfarpour, Masumeh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The increasing use of new technologies by pregnant women inevitably exposes them to the risks of the electromagnetic fields (EMFs). According to the World Health Organization, EMFs are the major sources of pollutants which harm human health. This study was aimed to evaluate the effects of EMF exposure on abortion. METHODS: Web of Science, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched until 2021. Pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was estimated using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was explored using Cochran’s Q test and I (2) index. A meta-regression method was employed to investigate the factors affecting heterogeneity between the studies. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the credibility of the studies. RESULTS: Eligible studies (N = 17) were analyzed with a total of 57,693 participants. The mean maternal age (95% CI) was 31.06 years (27.32–34.80). Based on meta-analysis results, the pooled estimate for OR of EMF with its effects was 1.27 (95% CI: 1.10–1.46). According to the results of meta-regression, sample size had a significant effect on heterogeneity between studies (p: 0.030), but mother’s age and publication year had no significant effect on heterogeneity (p-value of bothwere >0.05). No publication bias was observed. CONCLUSION: Exposure to EMFs above 50 Hz or 16 mG is associated with 1.27× increased risk of abortion. It may be prudent to advise women against this potentially important environmental hazard. Indeed, pregnant women should receive tailored counselling.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8569282
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher De Gruyter
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85692822021-11-09 Effect of electromagnetic field on abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis Ghazanfarpour, Masumeh Kashani, Zahra Atarodi Pakzad, Reza Abdi, Fatemeh Rahnemaei, Fatemeh Alsadat Akbari, Pouran Akhavan Roozbeh, Nasibeh Open Med (Wars) Research Article BACKGROUND: The increasing use of new technologies by pregnant women inevitably exposes them to the risks of the electromagnetic fields (EMFs). According to the World Health Organization, EMFs are the major sources of pollutants which harm human health. This study was aimed to evaluate the effects of EMF exposure on abortion. METHODS: Web of Science, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched until 2021. Pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was estimated using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was explored using Cochran’s Q test and I (2) index. A meta-regression method was employed to investigate the factors affecting heterogeneity between the studies. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the credibility of the studies. RESULTS: Eligible studies (N = 17) were analyzed with a total of 57,693 participants. The mean maternal age (95% CI) was 31.06 years (27.32–34.80). Based on meta-analysis results, the pooled estimate for OR of EMF with its effects was 1.27 (95% CI: 1.10–1.46). According to the results of meta-regression, sample size had a significant effect on heterogeneity between studies (p: 0.030), but mother’s age and publication year had no significant effect on heterogeneity (p-value of bothwere >0.05). No publication bias was observed. CONCLUSION: Exposure to EMFs above 50 Hz or 16 mG is associated with 1.27× increased risk of abortion. It may be prudent to advise women against this potentially important environmental hazard. Indeed, pregnant women should receive tailored counselling. De Gruyter 2021-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8569282/ /pubmed/34761114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2021-0384 Text en © 2021 Masumeh Ghazanfarpour et al., published by De Gruyter https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ghazanfarpour, Masumeh
Kashani, Zahra Atarodi
Pakzad, Reza
Abdi, Fatemeh
Rahnemaei, Fatemeh Alsadat
Akbari, Pouran Akhavan
Roozbeh, Nasibeh
Effect of electromagnetic field on abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Effect of electromagnetic field on abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Effect of electromagnetic field on abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Effect of electromagnetic field on abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effect of electromagnetic field on abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Effect of electromagnetic field on abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort effect of electromagnetic field on abortion: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8569282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34761114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2021-0384
work_keys_str_mv AT ghazanfarpourmasumeh effectofelectromagneticfieldonabortionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kashanizahraatarodi effectofelectromagneticfieldonabortionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pakzadreza effectofelectromagneticfieldonabortionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT abdifatemeh effectofelectromagneticfieldonabortionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rahnemaeifatemehalsadat effectofelectromagneticfieldonabortionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT akbaripouranakhavan effectofelectromagneticfieldonabortionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT roozbehnasibeh effectofelectromagneticfieldonabortionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis