Cargando…

Gender and age distribution of refractive errors in an optometric clinical population

AIM: To determine the patterns of distribution of refractive errors in a clinical sample of patients examined in an optometry practice. METHOD: In this retrospective study, the clinic records of 6687 patients aged 6 to 85 years comprising 2168 (32.2%) males and 4519 (67.5%) females were reviewed. Re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wajuihian, Samuel Otabor, Mashige, Khathutshelo Percy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8569398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33487574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2020.09.002
_version_ 1784594631841808384
author Wajuihian, Samuel Otabor
Mashige, Khathutshelo Percy
author_facet Wajuihian, Samuel Otabor
Mashige, Khathutshelo Percy
author_sort Wajuihian, Samuel Otabor
collection PubMed
description AIM: To determine the patterns of distribution of refractive errors in a clinical sample of patients examined in an optometry practice. METHOD: In this retrospective study, the clinic records of 6687 patients aged 6 to 85 years comprising 2168 (32.2%) males and 4519 (67.5%) females were reviewed. Refractive error were analysed according to gender, age, as well as types and categories including axis of astigmatism using the vector power analysis method where the traditional sphero-cylinder was transformed into J0 (primary) and J45 (oblique) astigmatic components. RESULTS: Only the analysis for right eye was reported as right and left spherical equivalent were similar. The mean with standard deviations for refractive errors were: Myopia: −1.95 ± 2.6, hyperopia: 1.04  ± 0.9, astigmatism: −1.22 ± 0.71 and anisometropia: −0.01 ± 2.5 DS. The distributions with significant changes included males that were significantly more myopic and astigmatic, while females were more hyperopic across the age groups. Furthermore, myopia decreased, while hyperopia, astigmatism and anisometropia increased with increasing age. Unique findings from this study include: myopia peaked earlier, second hyperopic shift commenced after age 82 years and the distribution of severity of astigmatism contrasts with previous understanding. CONCLUSION: Although the patterns of distribution of refractive errors in patients aged 6 to 85 years corroborates previous findings, myopia and hyperopia peak, as well as severity of astigmatism were unique to the present study. Results from non-clinic populations will be useful to confirm trends reported in this study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8569398
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85693982021-11-10 Gender and age distribution of refractive errors in an optometric clinical population Wajuihian, Samuel Otabor Mashige, Khathutshelo Percy J Optom Original Article AIM: To determine the patterns of distribution of refractive errors in a clinical sample of patients examined in an optometry practice. METHOD: In this retrospective study, the clinic records of 6687 patients aged 6 to 85 years comprising 2168 (32.2%) males and 4519 (67.5%) females were reviewed. Refractive error were analysed according to gender, age, as well as types and categories including axis of astigmatism using the vector power analysis method where the traditional sphero-cylinder was transformed into J0 (primary) and J45 (oblique) astigmatic components. RESULTS: Only the analysis for right eye was reported as right and left spherical equivalent were similar. The mean with standard deviations for refractive errors were: Myopia: −1.95 ± 2.6, hyperopia: 1.04  ± 0.9, astigmatism: −1.22 ± 0.71 and anisometropia: −0.01 ± 2.5 DS. The distributions with significant changes included males that were significantly more myopic and astigmatic, while females were more hyperopic across the age groups. Furthermore, myopia decreased, while hyperopia, astigmatism and anisometropia increased with increasing age. Unique findings from this study include: myopia peaked earlier, second hyperopic shift commenced after age 82 years and the distribution of severity of astigmatism contrasts with previous understanding. CONCLUSION: Although the patterns of distribution of refractive errors in patients aged 6 to 85 years corroborates previous findings, myopia and hyperopia peak, as well as severity of astigmatism were unique to the present study. Results from non-clinic populations will be useful to confirm trends reported in this study. Elsevier 2021 2021-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8569398/ /pubmed/33487574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2020.09.002 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. on behalf of Spanish General Council of Optometry. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Wajuihian, Samuel Otabor
Mashige, Khathutshelo Percy
Gender and age distribution of refractive errors in an optometric clinical population
title Gender and age distribution of refractive errors in an optometric clinical population
title_full Gender and age distribution of refractive errors in an optometric clinical population
title_fullStr Gender and age distribution of refractive errors in an optometric clinical population
title_full_unstemmed Gender and age distribution of refractive errors in an optometric clinical population
title_short Gender and age distribution of refractive errors in an optometric clinical population
title_sort gender and age distribution of refractive errors in an optometric clinical population
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8569398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33487574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2020.09.002
work_keys_str_mv AT wajuihiansamuelotabor genderandagedistributionofrefractiveerrorsinanoptometricclinicalpopulation
AT mashigekhathutshelopercy genderandagedistributionofrefractiveerrorsinanoptometricclinicalpopulation