Cargando…
Combined Compressed Sensing and SENSE to Enhance Radiation Therapy Magnetic Resonance Imaging Simulation
PURPOSE: To assess the effect of a combination of compressed sensing and SENSitivity Encoding (SENSE) acceleration techniques on radiation therapy magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) simulation workflows. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-seven acquisitions were performed with both SENSE-only (SENSE) and c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8569477/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34765805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2021.100799 |
Sumario: | PURPOSE: To assess the effect of a combination of compressed sensing and SENSitivity Encoding (SENSE) acceleration techniques on radiation therapy magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) simulation workflows. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-seven acquisitions were performed with both SENSE-only (SENSE) and combined compressed sensing and SENSE (CS) techniques in 24 patients receiving radiation therapy MRI simulation for a wide range of disease sites. The anatomic field of view prescription and image resolution were identical for both SENSE and CS acquisitions to ensure fair comparison. The acquisition time of all images was recorded to assess time savings. For each image pair, image quality, and ability to contour were assessed by 2 radiation oncologists. Aside from direct image pair comparisons, the feasibility of using CS to improve MRI simulation protocols by increasing image resolution, field of view, and reducing motion artifacts was also evaluated. RESULTS: CS resulted in an average reduction of 27% in scan time with negligible changes in image quality and the ability to contour structures for RT treatment planning compared with SENSE. Physician scoring of image quality and ability to contour shows that while SENSE still has slightly better image quality compared with CS, this observed difference in image quality did not affect the ability to contour. In addition, the higher acceleration capability of CS enabled use of superior-inferior direction phase encoding in a sagittal 3-dimensional T2-weighted scan for substantially improved visibility of the prostatic urethra, which eliminated the need for a Foley catheter in most patients. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of compressed sensing and parallel imaging resulted in marked improvements in the MRI Simulation workflow. The scan time was reduced without significantly affecting image quality in the context of ability to contour. The acceleration capabilities allowed for increased image resolution under similar scanning times as well as significantly improved urethra visualization in prostate simulations. |
---|