A Prospective, Comparative Study to Evaluate the Diagnostic Accuracy of Mallampati Grading in Supine and Sitting Positions for Prediction of Difficult Airway

Background & aim Difficult airway is a major concern for all anaesthesiologists because failure to secure airway could lead to devastating complications or may increase morbidity and mortality. Airway assessment, therefore, is of paramount importance and anticipating a difficult airway prior to anesthetic administration, could help us in better preparation as well as avoidance of life-threatening complications. There are various tests available to assess the airway, out of which, modified Mallampati test (MLPT) is one of the common, easy and reliable methods to predict difficult airway. Mallampati test, usually is done with patient in sitting position. However, in certain group of patients in whom sitting position is not possible (suspected cervical spine injury, pelvic injury, patients in shock, etc.), the Mallampati test can be done in supine position. Few studies were available which concluded that Mallampati test in supine position was not only reliable but also superior to sitting position, whereas, few other studies contradicted this opinion. We, therefore, wanted to address this issue and tried to find out whether Mallampati test in supine position could offer better diagnostic accuracy or not. Materials & methods Mallampati test (MLPT) in sitting position was done in 100 patients initially in preoperative period and subsequently in supine position inside operating room prior to induction of anesthesia. During laryngoscopy, Cormack-Lehane (CL) grading was noted in all patients. Correlation of Mallampati test in sitting and supine position with Cormack-Lehane grading was obtained. A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was done to determine the area under the curve, the sensitivity and the specificity. Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were also calculated to analyse the diagnostic accuracy of Mallampati score (MLPT) in sitting and supine position. Results A toal of 22.2% of patients had difficult intubation (CL grade 3) although MLPT of these patients in sitting position anticipated a non-difficult airway (MLPT 1 and 2) and there was no significant correlation between MLPT grade in sitting position with the Cormack-Lehane grade. In comparison to sitting position, MLPT in supine position had significant correlation with the Cormack-Lehane grading and all patients with supine MLPT 1 and 2 (non-difficult airway) had easy intubation (CL grade 1 and 2). ROC analysis also showed that MLPT grade in supine position had superior correlation and better diagnostic accuracy than MLPT in sitting position for assessment of airway as indicated by higher sensitivity and better positive as well as negative predictive values. Conclusion Mallampati test done in supine position has far greater sensitivity and is superior in predicting difficult intubation as compared to MLPT done in conventional sitting position.