Cargando…
The prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine use among Turkish patients with primary headache
BACKGROUND/AIM: The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is common in patients with primary headache. However, no study has been reported in which standardized modalities were questioned in a Turkish population. The aim of the present study was to investigate the frequency of CAM use...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8569749/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34247462 http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/sag-2102-234 |
_version_ | 1784594703186919424 |
---|---|
author | ARICA POLAT, Büşra Sümeyye SARILAR, Ayşe Çağlar |
author_facet | ARICA POLAT, Büşra Sümeyye SARILAR, Ayşe Çağlar |
author_sort | ARICA POLAT, Büşra Sümeyye |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIM: The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is common in patients with primary headache. However, no study has been reported in which standardized modalities were questioned in a Turkish population. The aim of the present study was to investigate the frequency of CAM use and factors related to it in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of primary headache were included in this cross-sectional observational study. Demographic and disease specific characteristics were recorded. The use and effect of 15 CAM modalities were evaluated in accordance with the Traditional and Complementary Medicine Regulations. The patients were categorized into two groups according to their use of CAM procedures. Logistic regression analysis was further performed to assess the association between CAM use and related factors. RESULTS: One hundred twenty patients [101 (84.2%) female, mean age 38.20 ± 12.24 years] were included. Use of CAM was reported in 33.3% of the patients. The most frequently used CAM modalities were phytotherapy (37.5%), cupping (27.5%), and chiropractic adjustment (17.5%). Compared with nonusers, CAM users showed a longer duration of disease (respectively mean 5.68 ± 4.96 years and 10.97 ± 8.57 years, p = 0.000). There were no differences with respect to age, sex, education, presence of systemic disease, headache subtypes, number of headache days in a month, or headache severity. Patients who underwent cupping reported that they benefited more than those who tried phytotherapy and multiple CAM methods (respectively 45.5%, 33.3%, 16.6%, p = 0.039). Subsequently, the logistic regression analysis showed a significant association between only disease duration and CAM use [respectively p value, OR (95% CI), and confidence intervals = 0.002 (1.143 (1.050–1.243)]. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that Turkish patients with primary headache, especially those with long disease duration, use CAM modalities. Larger population-based studies are required to clarify the safety and efficacy of these methods. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8569749 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85697492021-11-17 The prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine use among Turkish patients with primary headache ARICA POLAT, Büşra Sümeyye SARILAR, Ayşe Çağlar Turk J Med Sci Article BACKGROUND/AIM: The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is common in patients with primary headache. However, no study has been reported in which standardized modalities were questioned in a Turkish population. The aim of the present study was to investigate the frequency of CAM use and factors related to it in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of primary headache were included in this cross-sectional observational study. Demographic and disease specific characteristics were recorded. The use and effect of 15 CAM modalities were evaluated in accordance with the Traditional and Complementary Medicine Regulations. The patients were categorized into two groups according to their use of CAM procedures. Logistic regression analysis was further performed to assess the association between CAM use and related factors. RESULTS: One hundred twenty patients [101 (84.2%) female, mean age 38.20 ± 12.24 years] were included. Use of CAM was reported in 33.3% of the patients. The most frequently used CAM modalities were phytotherapy (37.5%), cupping (27.5%), and chiropractic adjustment (17.5%). Compared with nonusers, CAM users showed a longer duration of disease (respectively mean 5.68 ± 4.96 years and 10.97 ± 8.57 years, p = 0.000). There were no differences with respect to age, sex, education, presence of systemic disease, headache subtypes, number of headache days in a month, or headache severity. Patients who underwent cupping reported that they benefited more than those who tried phytotherapy and multiple CAM methods (respectively 45.5%, 33.3%, 16.6%, p = 0.039). Subsequently, the logistic regression analysis showed a significant association between only disease duration and CAM use [respectively p value, OR (95% CI), and confidence intervals = 0.002 (1.143 (1.050–1.243)]. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that Turkish patients with primary headache, especially those with long disease duration, use CAM modalities. Larger population-based studies are required to clarify the safety and efficacy of these methods. The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey 2021-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8569749/ /pubmed/34247462 http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/sag-2102-234 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article ARICA POLAT, Büşra Sümeyye SARILAR, Ayşe Çağlar The prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine use among Turkish patients with primary headache |
title | The prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine use among Turkish patients with primary headache |
title_full | The prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine use among Turkish patients with primary headache |
title_fullStr | The prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine use among Turkish patients with primary headache |
title_full_unstemmed | The prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine use among Turkish patients with primary headache |
title_short | The prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine use among Turkish patients with primary headache |
title_sort | prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine use among turkish patients with primary headache |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8569749/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34247462 http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/sag-2102-234 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aricapolatbusrasumeyye theprevalenceofcomplementaryandalternativemedicineuseamongturkishpatientswithprimaryheadache AT sarilaraysecaglar theprevalenceofcomplementaryandalternativemedicineuseamongturkishpatientswithprimaryheadache AT aricapolatbusrasumeyye prevalenceofcomplementaryandalternativemedicineuseamongturkishpatientswithprimaryheadache AT sarilaraysecaglar prevalenceofcomplementaryandalternativemedicineuseamongturkishpatientswithprimaryheadache |