Cargando…
A randomized comparison between ultrasound-guided costoclavicular and infraclavicular block for upper extremity surgery
BACKGROUND/AIM: This study compared ultrasound guided costoclavicular (CC) and lateral sagittal infraclavicular (LS) brachial plexus block in patients undergoing upper extremity surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 80 patients undergoing upper extremity surgery were randomly classified into tw...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8569785/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33890449 http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/sag-2011-126 |
_version_ | 1784594711917363200 |
---|---|
author | CESUR, Sevim YAYIK, Ahmet Murat DAŞ, Ayşe Nur AHISKALIOGLU, Ali |
author_facet | CESUR, Sevim YAYIK, Ahmet Murat DAŞ, Ayşe Nur AHISKALIOGLU, Ali |
author_sort | CESUR, Sevim |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIM: This study compared ultrasound guided costoclavicular (CC) and lateral sagittal infraclavicular (LS) brachial plexus block in patients undergoing upper extremity surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 80 patients undergoing upper extremity surgery were randomly classified into two groups: Group CC (costoclavicular (n = 40)) and Group LS (lateral sagittal infraclavicular (n = 40)). Both groups received a 25 mL containing a mixture of 1% lidocaine and 0.25% bupivacaine. A blinded observer recorded the block onset time and decided which patients who were admitted to the operation room needed general anesthesia or rescue block or without any iv. narcotics for the surgical procedure. RESULTS: The sensorimotor onset time was found to be faster in the CC group [(15.95 2.97) min] compared to the LS group [(17.72 4.15)min]. There was a statistically significant difference between two groups in terms of sensorimotor onset time (p = 0.031). There was no difference between two groups in terms of the block performance times and post-block motor block dissolution times. CONCLUSION: The CC approach provides faster onset of sensorimotor blockade than LS approach when the 4 major terminal nerves of the brachial plexus were evaluated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8569785 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85697852021-11-17 A randomized comparison between ultrasound-guided costoclavicular and infraclavicular block for upper extremity surgery CESUR, Sevim YAYIK, Ahmet Murat DAŞ, Ayşe Nur AHISKALIOGLU, Ali Turk J Med Sci Article BACKGROUND/AIM: This study compared ultrasound guided costoclavicular (CC) and lateral sagittal infraclavicular (LS) brachial plexus block in patients undergoing upper extremity surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 80 patients undergoing upper extremity surgery were randomly classified into two groups: Group CC (costoclavicular (n = 40)) and Group LS (lateral sagittal infraclavicular (n = 40)). Both groups received a 25 mL containing a mixture of 1% lidocaine and 0.25% bupivacaine. A blinded observer recorded the block onset time and decided which patients who were admitted to the operation room needed general anesthesia or rescue block or without any iv. narcotics for the surgical procedure. RESULTS: The sensorimotor onset time was found to be faster in the CC group [(15.95 2.97) min] compared to the LS group [(17.72 4.15)min]. There was a statistically significant difference between two groups in terms of sensorimotor onset time (p = 0.031). There was no difference between two groups in terms of the block performance times and post-block motor block dissolution times. CONCLUSION: The CC approach provides faster onset of sensorimotor blockade than LS approach when the 4 major terminal nerves of the brachial plexus were evaluated. The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey 2021-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8569785/ /pubmed/33890449 http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/sag-2011-126 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article CESUR, Sevim YAYIK, Ahmet Murat DAŞ, Ayşe Nur AHISKALIOGLU, Ali A randomized comparison between ultrasound-guided costoclavicular and infraclavicular block for upper extremity surgery |
title | A randomized comparison between ultrasound-guided costoclavicular and infraclavicular block for upper extremity surgery |
title_full | A randomized comparison between ultrasound-guided costoclavicular and infraclavicular block for upper extremity surgery |
title_fullStr | A randomized comparison between ultrasound-guided costoclavicular and infraclavicular block for upper extremity surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomized comparison between ultrasound-guided costoclavicular and infraclavicular block for upper extremity surgery |
title_short | A randomized comparison between ultrasound-guided costoclavicular and infraclavicular block for upper extremity surgery |
title_sort | randomized comparison between ultrasound-guided costoclavicular and infraclavicular block for upper extremity surgery |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8569785/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33890449 http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/sag-2011-126 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cesursevim arandomizedcomparisonbetweenultrasoundguidedcostoclavicularandinfraclavicularblockforupperextremitysurgery AT yayikahmetmurat arandomizedcomparisonbetweenultrasoundguidedcostoclavicularandinfraclavicularblockforupperextremitysurgery AT dasaysenur arandomizedcomparisonbetweenultrasoundguidedcostoclavicularandinfraclavicularblockforupperextremitysurgery AT ahiskaliogluali arandomizedcomparisonbetweenultrasoundguidedcostoclavicularandinfraclavicularblockforupperextremitysurgery AT cesursevim randomizedcomparisonbetweenultrasoundguidedcostoclavicularandinfraclavicularblockforupperextremitysurgery AT yayikahmetmurat randomizedcomparisonbetweenultrasoundguidedcostoclavicularandinfraclavicularblockforupperextremitysurgery AT dasaysenur randomizedcomparisonbetweenultrasoundguidedcostoclavicularandinfraclavicularblockforupperextremitysurgery AT ahiskaliogluali randomizedcomparisonbetweenultrasoundguidedcostoclavicularandinfraclavicularblockforupperextremitysurgery |