Cargando…

Establishment of a specimen panel for the decentralised technical evaluation of the sensitivity of 31 rapid diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2 antigen, Germany, September 2020 to April 2021

INTRODUCTION: The detection of SARS-CoV-2 with rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) has become an important tool to identify infected people and break infection chains. These RDT are usually based on antigen detection in a lateral flow approach. AIM: We aimed to establish a comprehensive specimen panel for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Puyskens, Andreas, Krause, Eva, Michel, Janine, Nübling, C Micha, Scheiblauer, Heinrich, Bourquain, Daniel, Grossegesse, Marica, Valusenko, Roman, Corman, Victor M, Drosten, Christian, Zwirglmaier, Katrin, Wölfel, Roman, Lange, Constanze, Kramer, Jan, Friesen, Johannes, Ignatius, Ralf, Müller, Michael, Schmidt-Chanasit, Jonas, Emmerich, Petra, Schaade, Lars, Nitsche, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8569922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34738516
http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.44.2100442
_version_ 1784594739582992384
author Puyskens, Andreas
Krause, Eva
Michel, Janine
Nübling, C Micha
Scheiblauer, Heinrich
Bourquain, Daniel
Grossegesse, Marica
Valusenko, Roman
Corman, Victor M
Drosten, Christian
Zwirglmaier, Katrin
Wölfel, Roman
Lange, Constanze
Kramer, Jan
Friesen, Johannes
Ignatius, Ralf
Müller, Michael
Schmidt-Chanasit, Jonas
Emmerich, Petra
Schaade, Lars
Nitsche, Andreas
author_facet Puyskens, Andreas
Krause, Eva
Michel, Janine
Nübling, C Micha
Scheiblauer, Heinrich
Bourquain, Daniel
Grossegesse, Marica
Valusenko, Roman
Corman, Victor M
Drosten, Christian
Zwirglmaier, Katrin
Wölfel, Roman
Lange, Constanze
Kramer, Jan
Friesen, Johannes
Ignatius, Ralf
Müller, Michael
Schmidt-Chanasit, Jonas
Emmerich, Petra
Schaade, Lars
Nitsche, Andreas
author_sort Puyskens, Andreas
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The detection of SARS-CoV-2 with rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) has become an important tool to identify infected people and break infection chains. These RDT are usually based on antigen detection in a lateral flow approach. AIM: We aimed to establish a comprehensive specimen panel for the decentralised technical evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid diagnostic tests. METHODS: While for PCR diagnostics the validation of a PCR assay is well established, there is no common validation strategy for antigen tests, including RDT. In this proof-of-principle study we present the establishment of a panel of 50 pooled clinical specimens that cover a SARS-CoV-2 concentration range from 1.1 × 10(9) to 420 genome copies per mL of specimen. The panel was used to evaluate 31 RDT in up to six laboratories. RESULTS: Our results show that there is considerable variation in the detection limits and the clinical sensitivity of different RDT. We show that the best RDT can be applied to reliably identify infectious individuals who present with SARS-CoV-2 loads down to 10(6) genome copies per mL of specimen. For the identification of infected individuals with SARS-CoV-2 loads corresponding to less than 10(6) genome copies per mL, only three RDT showed a clinical sensitivity of more than 60%. CONCLUSIONS: Sensitive RDT can be applied to identify infectious individuals with high viral loads but not to identify all infected individuals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8569922
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85699222021-11-18 Establishment of a specimen panel for the decentralised technical evaluation of the sensitivity of 31 rapid diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2 antigen, Germany, September 2020 to April 2021 Puyskens, Andreas Krause, Eva Michel, Janine Nübling, C Micha Scheiblauer, Heinrich Bourquain, Daniel Grossegesse, Marica Valusenko, Roman Corman, Victor M Drosten, Christian Zwirglmaier, Katrin Wölfel, Roman Lange, Constanze Kramer, Jan Friesen, Johannes Ignatius, Ralf Müller, Michael Schmidt-Chanasit, Jonas Emmerich, Petra Schaade, Lars Nitsche, Andreas Euro Surveill Research INTRODUCTION: The detection of SARS-CoV-2 with rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) has become an important tool to identify infected people and break infection chains. These RDT are usually based on antigen detection in a lateral flow approach. AIM: We aimed to establish a comprehensive specimen panel for the decentralised technical evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid diagnostic tests. METHODS: While for PCR diagnostics the validation of a PCR assay is well established, there is no common validation strategy for antigen tests, including RDT. In this proof-of-principle study we present the establishment of a panel of 50 pooled clinical specimens that cover a SARS-CoV-2 concentration range from 1.1 × 10(9) to 420 genome copies per mL of specimen. The panel was used to evaluate 31 RDT in up to six laboratories. RESULTS: Our results show that there is considerable variation in the detection limits and the clinical sensitivity of different RDT. We show that the best RDT can be applied to reliably identify infectious individuals who present with SARS-CoV-2 loads down to 10(6) genome copies per mL of specimen. For the identification of infected individuals with SARS-CoV-2 loads corresponding to less than 10(6) genome copies per mL, only three RDT showed a clinical sensitivity of more than 60%. CONCLUSIONS: Sensitive RDT can be applied to identify infectious individuals with high viral loads but not to identify all infected individuals. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) 2021-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8569922/ /pubmed/34738516 http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.44.2100442 Text en This article is copyright of the authors or their affiliated institutions, 2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) Licence. You may share and adapt the material, but must give appropriate credit to the source, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Puyskens, Andreas
Krause, Eva
Michel, Janine
Nübling, C Micha
Scheiblauer, Heinrich
Bourquain, Daniel
Grossegesse, Marica
Valusenko, Roman
Corman, Victor M
Drosten, Christian
Zwirglmaier, Katrin
Wölfel, Roman
Lange, Constanze
Kramer, Jan
Friesen, Johannes
Ignatius, Ralf
Müller, Michael
Schmidt-Chanasit, Jonas
Emmerich, Petra
Schaade, Lars
Nitsche, Andreas
Establishment of a specimen panel for the decentralised technical evaluation of the sensitivity of 31 rapid diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2 antigen, Germany, September 2020 to April 2021
title Establishment of a specimen panel for the decentralised technical evaluation of the sensitivity of 31 rapid diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2 antigen, Germany, September 2020 to April 2021
title_full Establishment of a specimen panel for the decentralised technical evaluation of the sensitivity of 31 rapid diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2 antigen, Germany, September 2020 to April 2021
title_fullStr Establishment of a specimen panel for the decentralised technical evaluation of the sensitivity of 31 rapid diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2 antigen, Germany, September 2020 to April 2021
title_full_unstemmed Establishment of a specimen panel for the decentralised technical evaluation of the sensitivity of 31 rapid diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2 antigen, Germany, September 2020 to April 2021
title_short Establishment of a specimen panel for the decentralised technical evaluation of the sensitivity of 31 rapid diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2 antigen, Germany, September 2020 to April 2021
title_sort establishment of a specimen panel for the decentralised technical evaluation of the sensitivity of 31 rapid diagnostic tests for sars-cov-2 antigen, germany, september 2020 to april 2021
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8569922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34738516
http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.44.2100442
work_keys_str_mv AT puyskensandreas establishmentofaspecimenpanelforthedecentralisedtechnicalevaluationofthesensitivityof31rapiddiagnostictestsforsarscov2antigengermanyseptember2020toapril2021
AT krauseeva establishmentofaspecimenpanelforthedecentralisedtechnicalevaluationofthesensitivityof31rapiddiagnostictestsforsarscov2antigengermanyseptember2020toapril2021
AT micheljanine establishmentofaspecimenpanelforthedecentralisedtechnicalevaluationofthesensitivityof31rapiddiagnostictestsforsarscov2antigengermanyseptember2020toapril2021
AT nublingcmicha establishmentofaspecimenpanelforthedecentralisedtechnicalevaluationofthesensitivityof31rapiddiagnostictestsforsarscov2antigengermanyseptember2020toapril2021
AT scheiblauerheinrich establishmentofaspecimenpanelforthedecentralisedtechnicalevaluationofthesensitivityof31rapiddiagnostictestsforsarscov2antigengermanyseptember2020toapril2021
AT bourquaindaniel establishmentofaspecimenpanelforthedecentralisedtechnicalevaluationofthesensitivityof31rapiddiagnostictestsforsarscov2antigengermanyseptember2020toapril2021
AT grossegessemarica establishmentofaspecimenpanelforthedecentralisedtechnicalevaluationofthesensitivityof31rapiddiagnostictestsforsarscov2antigengermanyseptember2020toapril2021
AT valusenkoroman establishmentofaspecimenpanelforthedecentralisedtechnicalevaluationofthesensitivityof31rapiddiagnostictestsforsarscov2antigengermanyseptember2020toapril2021
AT cormanvictorm establishmentofaspecimenpanelforthedecentralisedtechnicalevaluationofthesensitivityof31rapiddiagnostictestsforsarscov2antigengermanyseptember2020toapril2021
AT drostenchristian establishmentofaspecimenpanelforthedecentralisedtechnicalevaluationofthesensitivityof31rapiddiagnostictestsforsarscov2antigengermanyseptember2020toapril2021
AT zwirglmaierkatrin establishmentofaspecimenpanelforthedecentralisedtechnicalevaluationofthesensitivityof31rapiddiagnostictestsforsarscov2antigengermanyseptember2020toapril2021
AT wolfelroman establishmentofaspecimenpanelforthedecentralisedtechnicalevaluationofthesensitivityof31rapiddiagnostictestsforsarscov2antigengermanyseptember2020toapril2021
AT langeconstanze establishmentofaspecimenpanelforthedecentralisedtechnicalevaluationofthesensitivityof31rapiddiagnostictestsforsarscov2antigengermanyseptember2020toapril2021
AT kramerjan establishmentofaspecimenpanelforthedecentralisedtechnicalevaluationofthesensitivityof31rapiddiagnostictestsforsarscov2antigengermanyseptember2020toapril2021
AT friesenjohannes establishmentofaspecimenpanelforthedecentralisedtechnicalevaluationofthesensitivityof31rapiddiagnostictestsforsarscov2antigengermanyseptember2020toapril2021
AT ignatiusralf establishmentofaspecimenpanelforthedecentralisedtechnicalevaluationofthesensitivityof31rapiddiagnostictestsforsarscov2antigengermanyseptember2020toapril2021
AT mullermichael establishmentofaspecimenpanelforthedecentralisedtechnicalevaluationofthesensitivityof31rapiddiagnostictestsforsarscov2antigengermanyseptember2020toapril2021
AT schmidtchanasitjonas establishmentofaspecimenpanelforthedecentralisedtechnicalevaluationofthesensitivityof31rapiddiagnostictestsforsarscov2antigengermanyseptember2020toapril2021
AT emmerichpetra establishmentofaspecimenpanelforthedecentralisedtechnicalevaluationofthesensitivityof31rapiddiagnostictestsforsarscov2antigengermanyseptember2020toapril2021
AT schaadelars establishmentofaspecimenpanelforthedecentralisedtechnicalevaluationofthesensitivityof31rapiddiagnostictestsforsarscov2antigengermanyseptember2020toapril2021
AT nitscheandreas establishmentofaspecimenpanelforthedecentralisedtechnicalevaluationofthesensitivityof31rapiddiagnostictestsforsarscov2antigengermanyseptember2020toapril2021