Cargando…
Establishment of a specimen panel for the decentralised technical evaluation of the sensitivity of 31 rapid diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2 antigen, Germany, September 2020 to April 2021
INTRODUCTION: The detection of SARS-CoV-2 with rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) has become an important tool to identify infected people and break infection chains. These RDT are usually based on antigen detection in a lateral flow approach. AIM: We aimed to establish a comprehensive specimen panel for...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC)
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8569922/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34738516 http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.44.2100442 |
_version_ | 1784594739582992384 |
---|---|
author | Puyskens, Andreas Krause, Eva Michel, Janine Nübling, C Micha Scheiblauer, Heinrich Bourquain, Daniel Grossegesse, Marica Valusenko, Roman Corman, Victor M Drosten, Christian Zwirglmaier, Katrin Wölfel, Roman Lange, Constanze Kramer, Jan Friesen, Johannes Ignatius, Ralf Müller, Michael Schmidt-Chanasit, Jonas Emmerich, Petra Schaade, Lars Nitsche, Andreas |
author_facet | Puyskens, Andreas Krause, Eva Michel, Janine Nübling, C Micha Scheiblauer, Heinrich Bourquain, Daniel Grossegesse, Marica Valusenko, Roman Corman, Victor M Drosten, Christian Zwirglmaier, Katrin Wölfel, Roman Lange, Constanze Kramer, Jan Friesen, Johannes Ignatius, Ralf Müller, Michael Schmidt-Chanasit, Jonas Emmerich, Petra Schaade, Lars Nitsche, Andreas |
author_sort | Puyskens, Andreas |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The detection of SARS-CoV-2 with rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) has become an important tool to identify infected people and break infection chains. These RDT are usually based on antigen detection in a lateral flow approach. AIM: We aimed to establish a comprehensive specimen panel for the decentralised technical evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid diagnostic tests. METHODS: While for PCR diagnostics the validation of a PCR assay is well established, there is no common validation strategy for antigen tests, including RDT. In this proof-of-principle study we present the establishment of a panel of 50 pooled clinical specimens that cover a SARS-CoV-2 concentration range from 1.1 × 10(9) to 420 genome copies per mL of specimen. The panel was used to evaluate 31 RDT in up to six laboratories. RESULTS: Our results show that there is considerable variation in the detection limits and the clinical sensitivity of different RDT. We show that the best RDT can be applied to reliably identify infectious individuals who present with SARS-CoV-2 loads down to 10(6) genome copies per mL of specimen. For the identification of infected individuals with SARS-CoV-2 loads corresponding to less than 10(6) genome copies per mL, only three RDT showed a clinical sensitivity of more than 60%. CONCLUSIONS: Sensitive RDT can be applied to identify infectious individuals with high viral loads but not to identify all infected individuals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8569922 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85699222021-11-18 Establishment of a specimen panel for the decentralised technical evaluation of the sensitivity of 31 rapid diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2 antigen, Germany, September 2020 to April 2021 Puyskens, Andreas Krause, Eva Michel, Janine Nübling, C Micha Scheiblauer, Heinrich Bourquain, Daniel Grossegesse, Marica Valusenko, Roman Corman, Victor M Drosten, Christian Zwirglmaier, Katrin Wölfel, Roman Lange, Constanze Kramer, Jan Friesen, Johannes Ignatius, Ralf Müller, Michael Schmidt-Chanasit, Jonas Emmerich, Petra Schaade, Lars Nitsche, Andreas Euro Surveill Research INTRODUCTION: The detection of SARS-CoV-2 with rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) has become an important tool to identify infected people and break infection chains. These RDT are usually based on antigen detection in a lateral flow approach. AIM: We aimed to establish a comprehensive specimen panel for the decentralised technical evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid diagnostic tests. METHODS: While for PCR diagnostics the validation of a PCR assay is well established, there is no common validation strategy for antigen tests, including RDT. In this proof-of-principle study we present the establishment of a panel of 50 pooled clinical specimens that cover a SARS-CoV-2 concentration range from 1.1 × 10(9) to 420 genome copies per mL of specimen. The panel was used to evaluate 31 RDT in up to six laboratories. RESULTS: Our results show that there is considerable variation in the detection limits and the clinical sensitivity of different RDT. We show that the best RDT can be applied to reliably identify infectious individuals who present with SARS-CoV-2 loads down to 10(6) genome copies per mL of specimen. For the identification of infected individuals with SARS-CoV-2 loads corresponding to less than 10(6) genome copies per mL, only three RDT showed a clinical sensitivity of more than 60%. CONCLUSIONS: Sensitive RDT can be applied to identify infectious individuals with high viral loads but not to identify all infected individuals. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) 2021-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8569922/ /pubmed/34738516 http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.44.2100442 Text en This article is copyright of the authors or their affiliated institutions, 2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) Licence. You may share and adapt the material, but must give appropriate credit to the source, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Puyskens, Andreas Krause, Eva Michel, Janine Nübling, C Micha Scheiblauer, Heinrich Bourquain, Daniel Grossegesse, Marica Valusenko, Roman Corman, Victor M Drosten, Christian Zwirglmaier, Katrin Wölfel, Roman Lange, Constanze Kramer, Jan Friesen, Johannes Ignatius, Ralf Müller, Michael Schmidt-Chanasit, Jonas Emmerich, Petra Schaade, Lars Nitsche, Andreas Establishment of a specimen panel for the decentralised technical evaluation of the sensitivity of 31 rapid diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2 antigen, Germany, September 2020 to April 2021 |
title | Establishment of a specimen panel for the decentralised technical evaluation of the sensitivity of 31 rapid diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2 antigen, Germany, September 2020 to April 2021 |
title_full | Establishment of a specimen panel for the decentralised technical evaluation of the sensitivity of 31 rapid diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2 antigen, Germany, September 2020 to April 2021 |
title_fullStr | Establishment of a specimen panel for the decentralised technical evaluation of the sensitivity of 31 rapid diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2 antigen, Germany, September 2020 to April 2021 |
title_full_unstemmed | Establishment of a specimen panel for the decentralised technical evaluation of the sensitivity of 31 rapid diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2 antigen, Germany, September 2020 to April 2021 |
title_short | Establishment of a specimen panel for the decentralised technical evaluation of the sensitivity of 31 rapid diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2 antigen, Germany, September 2020 to April 2021 |
title_sort | establishment of a specimen panel for the decentralised technical evaluation of the sensitivity of 31 rapid diagnostic tests for sars-cov-2 antigen, germany, september 2020 to april 2021 |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8569922/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34738516 http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.44.2100442 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT puyskensandreas establishmentofaspecimenpanelforthedecentralisedtechnicalevaluationofthesensitivityof31rapiddiagnostictestsforsarscov2antigengermanyseptember2020toapril2021 AT krauseeva establishmentofaspecimenpanelforthedecentralisedtechnicalevaluationofthesensitivityof31rapiddiagnostictestsforsarscov2antigengermanyseptember2020toapril2021 AT micheljanine establishmentofaspecimenpanelforthedecentralisedtechnicalevaluationofthesensitivityof31rapiddiagnostictestsforsarscov2antigengermanyseptember2020toapril2021 AT nublingcmicha establishmentofaspecimenpanelforthedecentralisedtechnicalevaluationofthesensitivityof31rapiddiagnostictestsforsarscov2antigengermanyseptember2020toapril2021 AT scheiblauerheinrich establishmentofaspecimenpanelforthedecentralisedtechnicalevaluationofthesensitivityof31rapiddiagnostictestsforsarscov2antigengermanyseptember2020toapril2021 AT bourquaindaniel establishmentofaspecimenpanelforthedecentralisedtechnicalevaluationofthesensitivityof31rapiddiagnostictestsforsarscov2antigengermanyseptember2020toapril2021 AT grossegessemarica establishmentofaspecimenpanelforthedecentralisedtechnicalevaluationofthesensitivityof31rapiddiagnostictestsforsarscov2antigengermanyseptember2020toapril2021 AT valusenkoroman establishmentofaspecimenpanelforthedecentralisedtechnicalevaluationofthesensitivityof31rapiddiagnostictestsforsarscov2antigengermanyseptember2020toapril2021 AT cormanvictorm establishmentofaspecimenpanelforthedecentralisedtechnicalevaluationofthesensitivityof31rapiddiagnostictestsforsarscov2antigengermanyseptember2020toapril2021 AT drostenchristian establishmentofaspecimenpanelforthedecentralisedtechnicalevaluationofthesensitivityof31rapiddiagnostictestsforsarscov2antigengermanyseptember2020toapril2021 AT zwirglmaierkatrin establishmentofaspecimenpanelforthedecentralisedtechnicalevaluationofthesensitivityof31rapiddiagnostictestsforsarscov2antigengermanyseptember2020toapril2021 AT wolfelroman establishmentofaspecimenpanelforthedecentralisedtechnicalevaluationofthesensitivityof31rapiddiagnostictestsforsarscov2antigengermanyseptember2020toapril2021 AT langeconstanze establishmentofaspecimenpanelforthedecentralisedtechnicalevaluationofthesensitivityof31rapiddiagnostictestsforsarscov2antigengermanyseptember2020toapril2021 AT kramerjan establishmentofaspecimenpanelforthedecentralisedtechnicalevaluationofthesensitivityof31rapiddiagnostictestsforsarscov2antigengermanyseptember2020toapril2021 AT friesenjohannes establishmentofaspecimenpanelforthedecentralisedtechnicalevaluationofthesensitivityof31rapiddiagnostictestsforsarscov2antigengermanyseptember2020toapril2021 AT ignatiusralf establishmentofaspecimenpanelforthedecentralisedtechnicalevaluationofthesensitivityof31rapiddiagnostictestsforsarscov2antigengermanyseptember2020toapril2021 AT mullermichael establishmentofaspecimenpanelforthedecentralisedtechnicalevaluationofthesensitivityof31rapiddiagnostictestsforsarscov2antigengermanyseptember2020toapril2021 AT schmidtchanasitjonas establishmentofaspecimenpanelforthedecentralisedtechnicalevaluationofthesensitivityof31rapiddiagnostictestsforsarscov2antigengermanyseptember2020toapril2021 AT emmerichpetra establishmentofaspecimenpanelforthedecentralisedtechnicalevaluationofthesensitivityof31rapiddiagnostictestsforsarscov2antigengermanyseptember2020toapril2021 AT schaadelars establishmentofaspecimenpanelforthedecentralisedtechnicalevaluationofthesensitivityof31rapiddiagnostictestsforsarscov2antigengermanyseptember2020toapril2021 AT nitscheandreas establishmentofaspecimenpanelforthedecentralisedtechnicalevaluationofthesensitivityof31rapiddiagnostictestsforsarscov2antigengermanyseptember2020toapril2021 |