Cargando…
Demand for Intensive Care beds and patient classification according to the priority criterion*
OBJECTIVE: to assess the demand for Intensive Care Unit beds as well as the classification of the patients for admission, according to the priority system. METHOD: a retrospective and cross-sectional study, developed from January2014 to December2018 in two Intensive Care Units for adults of a univer...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8570257/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34730765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.4945.3489 |
Sumario: | OBJECTIVE: to assess the demand for Intensive Care Unit beds as well as the classification of the patients for admission, according to the priority system. METHOD: a retrospective and cross-sectional study, developed from January2014 to December2018 in two Intensive Care Units for adults of a university hospital. The sample consisted of the requests for vacancies according to the priority system(scale from 1 to 4, where 1 is the highest priority and 4 is no priority), registered in the institution’s electronic system. RESULTS: a total of 8,483 vacancies were requested, of which 4,389(51.7%) were from unitB. The highest percentage in unitA was of Priority2 patients(32.6%); and Priority1 was prevalent in unitB(45.4%). The median lead time between request and admission to unitA presented a lower value for priority1 patients(2h57) and a higher value for priority4 patients(11h24); in unitB, priority4 patients presented shorter time(5h54) and priority3 had longer time(11h54). 40.5% of the requests made to unitA and 48.5% of those made to unitB were fulfilled, with 50.7% and 48.5% of these patients being discharged from the units, respectively. CONCLUSION: it is concluded that the demand for intensive care beds was greater than their availability. Most of the patients assisted were priorities1 and2, although a considerable percentage of those classified as priorities3 and4 is observed. |
---|