Cargando…

Demand for Intensive Care beds and patient classification according to the priority criterion*

OBJECTIVE: to assess the demand for Intensive Care Unit beds as well as the classification of the patients for admission, according to the priority system. METHOD: a retrospective and cross-sectional study, developed from January2014 to December2018 in two Intensive Care Units for adults of a univer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nassiff, Aline, Menegueti, Mayra Gonçalves, de Araújo, Thamiris Ricci, Auxiliadora-Martins, Maria, Laus, Ana Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8570257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34730765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.4945.3489
_version_ 1784594806276620288
author Nassiff, Aline
Menegueti, Mayra Gonçalves
de Araújo, Thamiris Ricci
Auxiliadora-Martins, Maria
Laus, Ana Maria
author_facet Nassiff, Aline
Menegueti, Mayra Gonçalves
de Araújo, Thamiris Ricci
Auxiliadora-Martins, Maria
Laus, Ana Maria
author_sort Nassiff, Aline
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: to assess the demand for Intensive Care Unit beds as well as the classification of the patients for admission, according to the priority system. METHOD: a retrospective and cross-sectional study, developed from January2014 to December2018 in two Intensive Care Units for adults of a university hospital. The sample consisted of the requests for vacancies according to the priority system(scale from 1 to 4, where 1 is the highest priority and 4 is no priority), registered in the institution’s electronic system. RESULTS: a total of 8,483 vacancies were requested, of which 4,389(51.7%) were from unitB. The highest percentage in unitA was of Priority2 patients(32.6%); and Priority1 was prevalent in unitB(45.4%). The median lead time between request and admission to unitA presented a lower value for priority1 patients(2h57) and a higher value for priority4 patients(11h24); in unitB, priority4 patients presented shorter time(5h54) and priority3 had longer time(11h54). 40.5% of the requests made to unitA and 48.5% of those made to unitB were fulfilled, with 50.7% and 48.5% of these patients being discharged from the units, respectively. CONCLUSION: it is concluded that the demand for intensive care beds was greater than their availability. Most of the patients assisted were priorities1 and2, although a considerable percentage of those classified as priorities3 and4 is observed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8570257
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85702572021-11-17 Demand for Intensive Care beds and patient classification according to the priority criterion* Nassiff, Aline Menegueti, Mayra Gonçalves de Araújo, Thamiris Ricci Auxiliadora-Martins, Maria Laus, Ana Maria Rev Lat Am Enfermagem Original Article OBJECTIVE: to assess the demand for Intensive Care Unit beds as well as the classification of the patients for admission, according to the priority system. METHOD: a retrospective and cross-sectional study, developed from January2014 to December2018 in two Intensive Care Units for adults of a university hospital. The sample consisted of the requests for vacancies according to the priority system(scale from 1 to 4, where 1 is the highest priority and 4 is no priority), registered in the institution’s electronic system. RESULTS: a total of 8,483 vacancies were requested, of which 4,389(51.7%) were from unitB. The highest percentage in unitA was of Priority2 patients(32.6%); and Priority1 was prevalent in unitB(45.4%). The median lead time between request and admission to unitA presented a lower value for priority1 patients(2h57) and a higher value for priority4 patients(11h24); in unitB, priority4 patients presented shorter time(5h54) and priority3 had longer time(11h54). 40.5% of the requests made to unitA and 48.5% of those made to unitB were fulfilled, with 50.7% and 48.5% of these patients being discharged from the units, respectively. CONCLUSION: it is concluded that the demand for intensive care beds was greater than their availability. Most of the patients assisted were priorities1 and2, although a considerable percentage of those classified as priorities3 and4 is observed. Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo 2021-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8570257/ /pubmed/34730765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.4945.3489 Text en Copyright © 2021 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Nassiff, Aline
Menegueti, Mayra Gonçalves
de Araújo, Thamiris Ricci
Auxiliadora-Martins, Maria
Laus, Ana Maria
Demand for Intensive Care beds and patient classification according to the priority criterion*
title Demand for Intensive Care beds and patient classification according to the priority criterion*
title_full Demand for Intensive Care beds and patient classification according to the priority criterion*
title_fullStr Demand for Intensive Care beds and patient classification according to the priority criterion*
title_full_unstemmed Demand for Intensive Care beds and patient classification according to the priority criterion*
title_short Demand for Intensive Care beds and patient classification according to the priority criterion*
title_sort demand for intensive care beds and patient classification according to the priority criterion*
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8570257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34730765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.4945.3489
work_keys_str_mv AT nassiffaline demandforintensivecarebedsandpatientclassificationaccordingtotheprioritycriterion
AT meneguetimayragoncalves demandforintensivecarebedsandpatientclassificationaccordingtotheprioritycriterion
AT dearaujothamirisricci demandforintensivecarebedsandpatientclassificationaccordingtotheprioritycriterion
AT auxiliadoramartinsmaria demandforintensivecarebedsandpatientclassificationaccordingtotheprioritycriterion
AT lausanamaria demandforintensivecarebedsandpatientclassificationaccordingtotheprioritycriterion