Cargando…

Why Not a Sound Postulate?

What, if anything, would be wrong with replacing the light postulate in Einstein’s 1905 formulation of special relativity with a ‘sound postulate’, stating that the speed of sound is independent of the speed of the source? After reviewing the historical reasons underlying the particular focus on lig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheng, Bryan, Read, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8570337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34759387
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10701-021-00479-0
_version_ 1784594820541448192
author Cheng, Bryan
Read, James
author_facet Cheng, Bryan
Read, James
author_sort Cheng, Bryan
collection PubMed
description What, if anything, would be wrong with replacing the light postulate in Einstein’s 1905 formulation of special relativity with a ‘sound postulate’, stating that the speed of sound is independent of the speed of the source? After reviewing the historical reasons underlying the particular focus on light in the special theory, we consider the circumstances under which such a theory of ‘sonic relativity’ would be justified on empirical grounds. We then consider the philosophical upshots of ‘sonic relativity’ for four contemporary areas of investigation in the philosophy of spacetime: (i) global versus subsystem symmetries, (ii) dynamical versus geometrical approaches to spacetime, (iii) the possibility of a preferred frame in theories of quantum gravity, and (iv) spacetime functionalism.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8570337
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85703372021-11-08 Why Not a Sound Postulate? Cheng, Bryan Read, James Found Phys Article What, if anything, would be wrong with replacing the light postulate in Einstein’s 1905 formulation of special relativity with a ‘sound postulate’, stating that the speed of sound is independent of the speed of the source? After reviewing the historical reasons underlying the particular focus on light in the special theory, we consider the circumstances under which such a theory of ‘sonic relativity’ would be justified on empirical grounds. We then consider the philosophical upshots of ‘sonic relativity’ for four contemporary areas of investigation in the philosophy of spacetime: (i) global versus subsystem symmetries, (ii) dynamical versus geometrical approaches to spacetime, (iii) the possibility of a preferred frame in theories of quantum gravity, and (iv) spacetime functionalism. Springer US 2021-06-21 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8570337/ /pubmed/34759387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10701-021-00479-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Cheng, Bryan
Read, James
Why Not a Sound Postulate?
title Why Not a Sound Postulate?
title_full Why Not a Sound Postulate?
title_fullStr Why Not a Sound Postulate?
title_full_unstemmed Why Not a Sound Postulate?
title_short Why Not a Sound Postulate?
title_sort why not a sound postulate?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8570337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34759387
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10701-021-00479-0
work_keys_str_mv AT chengbryan whynotasoundpostulate
AT readjames whynotasoundpostulate