Cargando…
A comparison of zero-inflated and hurdle models for modeling zero-inflated count data
Counts data with excessive zeros are frequently encountered in practice. For example, the number of health services visits often includes many zeros representing the patients with no utilization during a follow-up time. A common feature of this type of data is that the count measure tends to have ex...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8570364/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34760432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40488-021-00121-4 |
_version_ | 1784594823742750720 |
---|---|
author | Feng, Cindy Xin |
author_facet | Feng, Cindy Xin |
author_sort | Feng, Cindy Xin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Counts data with excessive zeros are frequently encountered in practice. For example, the number of health services visits often includes many zeros representing the patients with no utilization during a follow-up time. A common feature of this type of data is that the count measure tends to have excessive zero beyond a common count distribution can accommodate, such as Poisson or negative binomial. Zero-inflated or hurdle models are often used to fit such data. Despite the increasing popularity of ZI and hurdle models, there is still a lack of investigation of the fundamental differences between these two types of models. In this article, we reviewed the zero-inflated and hurdle models and highlighted their differences in terms of their data generating processes. We also conducted simulation studies to evaluate the performances of both types of models. The final choice of regression model should be made after a careful assessment of goodness of fit and should be tailored to a particular data in question. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8570364 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85703642021-11-08 A comparison of zero-inflated and hurdle models for modeling zero-inflated count data Feng, Cindy Xin J Stat Distrib Appl Review Counts data with excessive zeros are frequently encountered in practice. For example, the number of health services visits often includes many zeros representing the patients with no utilization during a follow-up time. A common feature of this type of data is that the count measure tends to have excessive zero beyond a common count distribution can accommodate, such as Poisson or negative binomial. Zero-inflated or hurdle models are often used to fit such data. Despite the increasing popularity of ZI and hurdle models, there is still a lack of investigation of the fundamental differences between these two types of models. In this article, we reviewed the zero-inflated and hurdle models and highlighted their differences in terms of their data generating processes. We also conducted simulation studies to evaluate the performances of both types of models. The final choice of regression model should be made after a careful assessment of goodness of fit and should be tailored to a particular data in question. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-06-24 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8570364/ /pubmed/34760432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40488-021-00121-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Feng, Cindy Xin A comparison of zero-inflated and hurdle models for modeling zero-inflated count data |
title | A comparison of zero-inflated and hurdle models for modeling zero-inflated count data |
title_full | A comparison of zero-inflated and hurdle models for modeling zero-inflated count data |
title_fullStr | A comparison of zero-inflated and hurdle models for modeling zero-inflated count data |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of zero-inflated and hurdle models for modeling zero-inflated count data |
title_short | A comparison of zero-inflated and hurdle models for modeling zero-inflated count data |
title_sort | comparison of zero-inflated and hurdle models for modeling zero-inflated count data |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8570364/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34760432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40488-021-00121-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fengcindyxin acomparisonofzeroinflatedandhurdlemodelsformodelingzeroinflatedcountdata AT fengcindyxin comparisonofzeroinflatedandhurdlemodelsformodelingzeroinflatedcountdata |