Cargando…

Tensile modulus of human orbital wall bones cut in sagittal and coronal planes

In the current research, 68 specimens of orbital superior and/or medial walls taken from 33 human cadavers (12 females, 21 males) were subjected to uniaxial tension untill fracture. The samples were cut in the coronal (38 specimens) and sagittal (30 specimens) planes of the orbital wall. Apparent de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zerdzicki, Krzysztof, Lemski, Pawel, Klosowski, Pawel, Skorek, Andrzej, Zmuda Trzebiatowski, Marcin, Koberda, Mateusz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8570484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34739503
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259363
_version_ 1784594850276966400
author Zerdzicki, Krzysztof
Lemski, Pawel
Klosowski, Pawel
Skorek, Andrzej
Zmuda Trzebiatowski, Marcin
Koberda, Mateusz
author_facet Zerdzicki, Krzysztof
Lemski, Pawel
Klosowski, Pawel
Skorek, Andrzej
Zmuda Trzebiatowski, Marcin
Koberda, Mateusz
author_sort Zerdzicki, Krzysztof
collection PubMed
description In the current research, 68 specimens of orbital superior and/or medial walls taken from 33 human cadavers (12 females, 21 males) were subjected to uniaxial tension untill fracture. The samples were cut in the coronal (38 specimens) and sagittal (30 specimens) planes of the orbital wall. Apparent density (ρ(app)), tensile Young’s modulus (E-modulus) and ultimate tensile strength (UTS) were identified. Innovative test protocols were used to minimize artifacts and analyze the obtained data: (1) grips dedicated to non-symmetrical samples clamping were applied for mechanical testing, (2) non-contact measuring system of video-extensometer was employed for displacement registration, (3) ink imprint technique coupled with CAD analysis was applied to precisely access the cross-sectional areas of tested samples. With regard to a pooled group, apparent density for the coronal and sagittal cut plane was equal 1.53 g/cm(3) and 1.57 g/cm(3), tensile Young’s modulus 2.36 GPa and 2.14 GPa, and ultimate tensile strength 12.66 MPa and 14.35 MPa, respectively. No significant statistical differences (p > 0.05) were found for all the analyzed parameters when comparing coronal and sagittal plane cut groups. These observations confirmed the hypothesis that direction of sample cut does not affect the mechanical response of the orbital wall tissue, thus suggesting that mechanical properties of orbital wall bone show isotropic character.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8570484
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85704842021-11-06 Tensile modulus of human orbital wall bones cut in sagittal and coronal planes Zerdzicki, Krzysztof Lemski, Pawel Klosowski, Pawel Skorek, Andrzej Zmuda Trzebiatowski, Marcin Koberda, Mateusz PLoS One Research Article In the current research, 68 specimens of orbital superior and/or medial walls taken from 33 human cadavers (12 females, 21 males) were subjected to uniaxial tension untill fracture. The samples were cut in the coronal (38 specimens) and sagittal (30 specimens) planes of the orbital wall. Apparent density (ρ(app)), tensile Young’s modulus (E-modulus) and ultimate tensile strength (UTS) were identified. Innovative test protocols were used to minimize artifacts and analyze the obtained data: (1) grips dedicated to non-symmetrical samples clamping were applied for mechanical testing, (2) non-contact measuring system of video-extensometer was employed for displacement registration, (3) ink imprint technique coupled with CAD analysis was applied to precisely access the cross-sectional areas of tested samples. With regard to a pooled group, apparent density for the coronal and sagittal cut plane was equal 1.53 g/cm(3) and 1.57 g/cm(3), tensile Young’s modulus 2.36 GPa and 2.14 GPa, and ultimate tensile strength 12.66 MPa and 14.35 MPa, respectively. No significant statistical differences (p > 0.05) were found for all the analyzed parameters when comparing coronal and sagittal plane cut groups. These observations confirmed the hypothesis that direction of sample cut does not affect the mechanical response of the orbital wall tissue, thus suggesting that mechanical properties of orbital wall bone show isotropic character. Public Library of Science 2021-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8570484/ /pubmed/34739503 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259363 Text en © 2021 Zerdzicki et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zerdzicki, Krzysztof
Lemski, Pawel
Klosowski, Pawel
Skorek, Andrzej
Zmuda Trzebiatowski, Marcin
Koberda, Mateusz
Tensile modulus of human orbital wall bones cut in sagittal and coronal planes
title Tensile modulus of human orbital wall bones cut in sagittal and coronal planes
title_full Tensile modulus of human orbital wall bones cut in sagittal and coronal planes
title_fullStr Tensile modulus of human orbital wall bones cut in sagittal and coronal planes
title_full_unstemmed Tensile modulus of human orbital wall bones cut in sagittal and coronal planes
title_short Tensile modulus of human orbital wall bones cut in sagittal and coronal planes
title_sort tensile modulus of human orbital wall bones cut in sagittal and coronal planes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8570484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34739503
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259363
work_keys_str_mv AT zerdzickikrzysztof tensilemodulusofhumanorbitalwallbonescutinsagittalandcoronalplanes
AT lemskipawel tensilemodulusofhumanorbitalwallbonescutinsagittalandcoronalplanes
AT klosowskipawel tensilemodulusofhumanorbitalwallbonescutinsagittalandcoronalplanes
AT skorekandrzej tensilemodulusofhumanorbitalwallbonescutinsagittalandcoronalplanes
AT zmudatrzebiatowskimarcin tensilemodulusofhumanorbitalwallbonescutinsagittalandcoronalplanes
AT koberdamateusz tensilemodulusofhumanorbitalwallbonescutinsagittalandcoronalplanes