Cargando…

BRAF testing in metastatic colorectal carcinoma and novel, chemotherapy-free therapeutic options

In the past 25 years, treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has undergone profound changes. The approval of newer chemotherapeutics such as irinotecan and oxaliplatin was followed in 2005 by the first targeted therapies, for example, monoclonal antibodies directed against the epidermal gr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hummel, Michael, Hegewisch-Becker, Susanna, Neumann, Jens H. L., Vogel, Arndt
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Medizin 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8571135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34259881
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00292-021-00946-5
_version_ 1784594951196114944
author Hummel, Michael
Hegewisch-Becker, Susanna
Neumann, Jens H. L.
Vogel, Arndt
author_facet Hummel, Michael
Hegewisch-Becker, Susanna
Neumann, Jens H. L.
Vogel, Arndt
author_sort Hummel, Michael
collection PubMed
description In the past 25 years, treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has undergone profound changes. The approval of newer chemotherapeutics such as irinotecan and oxaliplatin was followed in 2005 by the first targeted therapies, for example, monoclonal antibodies directed against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), as cetuximab and panitumumab, or the angiogenesis inhibitors bevacizumab, ramucirumab, and aflibercept. With the rapidly progressing molecular characterization of mCRC in the last 10 years and the classification of the disease in four consensus subtypes, further changes are emerging, which will promote, among other things, the introduction of protein-kinase inhibitors developed for specific molecular aberrations as well as immune checkpoint inhibitors into the treatment algorithm. Thorough molecular pathologic testing is indispensable today for guideline-compliant treatment of mCRC patients. In addition to RAS testing as a precondition for the therapy decision with regard to cetuximab and panitumumab, BRAF testing is of considerable relevance to allow decision making with regard to the newly approved chemotherapy-free combination of the BRAF inhibitor encorafenib and cetuximab in cases where a BRAF-V600E mutation is detected. Additional diagnostic tests should also include genome instability (microsatellite instability). Overall, more and more molecular alterations need to be investigated simultaneously, so that the use of focused next-generation sequencing is increasingly recommended. This overview describes the prognostic relevance of BRAF testing in the context of molecular pathologic diagnostics of mCRC, presents new treatment options for BRAF-mutated mCRC patients, and explains which modern DNA analytical and immunohistochemical methods are available to detect BRAF mutations in mCRC patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8571135
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Medizin
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85711352021-11-08 BRAF testing in metastatic colorectal carcinoma and novel, chemotherapy-free therapeutic options Hummel, Michael Hegewisch-Becker, Susanna Neumann, Jens H. L. Vogel, Arndt Pathologe Review In the past 25 years, treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has undergone profound changes. The approval of newer chemotherapeutics such as irinotecan and oxaliplatin was followed in 2005 by the first targeted therapies, for example, monoclonal antibodies directed against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), as cetuximab and panitumumab, or the angiogenesis inhibitors bevacizumab, ramucirumab, and aflibercept. With the rapidly progressing molecular characterization of mCRC in the last 10 years and the classification of the disease in four consensus subtypes, further changes are emerging, which will promote, among other things, the introduction of protein-kinase inhibitors developed for specific molecular aberrations as well as immune checkpoint inhibitors into the treatment algorithm. Thorough molecular pathologic testing is indispensable today for guideline-compliant treatment of mCRC patients. In addition to RAS testing as a precondition for the therapy decision with regard to cetuximab and panitumumab, BRAF testing is of considerable relevance to allow decision making with regard to the newly approved chemotherapy-free combination of the BRAF inhibitor encorafenib and cetuximab in cases where a BRAF-V600E mutation is detected. Additional diagnostic tests should also include genome instability (microsatellite instability). Overall, more and more molecular alterations need to be investigated simultaneously, so that the use of focused next-generation sequencing is increasingly recommended. This overview describes the prognostic relevance of BRAF testing in the context of molecular pathologic diagnostics of mCRC, presents new treatment options for BRAF-mutated mCRC patients, and explains which modern DNA analytical and immunohistochemical methods are available to detect BRAF mutations in mCRC patients. Springer Medizin 2021-07-14 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8571135/ /pubmed/34259881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00292-021-00946-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Hummel, Michael
Hegewisch-Becker, Susanna
Neumann, Jens H. L.
Vogel, Arndt
BRAF testing in metastatic colorectal carcinoma and novel, chemotherapy-free therapeutic options
title BRAF testing in metastatic colorectal carcinoma and novel, chemotherapy-free therapeutic options
title_full BRAF testing in metastatic colorectal carcinoma and novel, chemotherapy-free therapeutic options
title_fullStr BRAF testing in metastatic colorectal carcinoma and novel, chemotherapy-free therapeutic options
title_full_unstemmed BRAF testing in metastatic colorectal carcinoma and novel, chemotherapy-free therapeutic options
title_short BRAF testing in metastatic colorectal carcinoma and novel, chemotherapy-free therapeutic options
title_sort braf testing in metastatic colorectal carcinoma and novel, chemotherapy-free therapeutic options
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8571135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34259881
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00292-021-00946-5
work_keys_str_mv AT hummelmichael braftestinginmetastaticcolorectalcarcinomaandnovelchemotherapyfreetherapeuticoptions
AT hegewischbeckersusanna braftestinginmetastaticcolorectalcarcinomaandnovelchemotherapyfreetherapeuticoptions
AT neumannjenshl braftestinginmetastaticcolorectalcarcinomaandnovelchemotherapyfreetherapeuticoptions
AT vogelarndt braftestinginmetastaticcolorectalcarcinomaandnovelchemotherapyfreetherapeuticoptions