Cargando…

Ventriculo-atrial shunt. Comparison of an ultrasound-guided peel-away technique versus conventional technique in the management of normal pressure hydrocephalus: A retrospective cohort

BACKGROUND: Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) is a common neurodegenerative syndrome among the elderly characterized by ventriculomegaly and the classic triad of symmetric gait disturbance, cognitive decline and urinary incontinence. To date, the only effective treatment is a cerebrospinal fluid s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Segura-Hernández, Andrés, Hakim, Fernando, Ramón, Juan F., Jiménez-Hakim, Enrique, Mejía-Cordovez, Juan A., Quintero-Rueda, Diego, Araque-Puello, Yessid, Pedraza-Ciro, Camila, Leal-Isaza, Juan P., Mendoza-Mantilla, Juliana, Robles, Vanesa, Gonzalez, Martina, Jaramillo-Velásquez, Daniel, Gómez, Diego F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Scientific Scholar 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8571261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34754581
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_613_2021
_version_ 1784594978695020544
author Segura-Hernández, Andrés
Hakim, Fernando
Ramón, Juan F.
Jiménez-Hakim, Enrique
Mejía-Cordovez, Juan A.
Quintero-Rueda, Diego
Araque-Puello, Yessid
Pedraza-Ciro, Camila
Leal-Isaza, Juan P.
Mendoza-Mantilla, Juliana
Robles, Vanesa
Gonzalez, Martina
Jaramillo-Velásquez, Daniel
Gómez, Diego F.
author_facet Segura-Hernández, Andrés
Hakim, Fernando
Ramón, Juan F.
Jiménez-Hakim, Enrique
Mejía-Cordovez, Juan A.
Quintero-Rueda, Diego
Araque-Puello, Yessid
Pedraza-Ciro, Camila
Leal-Isaza, Juan P.
Mendoza-Mantilla, Juliana
Robles, Vanesa
Gonzalez, Martina
Jaramillo-Velásquez, Daniel
Gómez, Diego F.
author_sort Segura-Hernández, Andrés
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) is a common neurodegenerative syndrome among the elderly characterized by ventriculomegaly and the classic triad of symmetric gait disturbance, cognitive decline and urinary incontinence. To date, the only effective treatment is a cerebrospinal fluid shunting procedure that can either be ventriculo-atrial, ventriculo-peritoneal, or lumbo-peritoneal shunt. The conventional ventriculo-atrial shunt uses venodissection, whereas the peel-away is a percutaneous ultrasound (US)-guided technique that shows some advantages over conventional technique. We sought to compare perioperative complication rates, mean operating time and clinical outcomes for both techniques in NPH patients at our institution. METHODS: A retrospective cohort-type analytical study was conducted, using clinical record data of patients diagnosed with NPH and treated at our center from January 2009 to September 2019. Parameters to be compared include: Perioperative complication rates, intraoperative bleeding, mortality, and mean operating time. Perioperative complication rates are those device-related such as shunt infection, dysfunction, and those associated with the procedure. Complications are further classified in immediate (occurring during the first inpatient stay), early (within the first 30 days of surgery), and late (after day 30 of surgery). RESULTS: A total of 123 patients underwent ventriculo-atrial shunt. Eighty-two patients (67%) underwent conventional venodissection technique and 41 patients (33%) underwent a peel-away technique. Immediate complications were 3 (3.6%) and 0 for conventional and peel-away groups, respectively. Early complications were 0 and 1 (2.4%) for conventional and peel-away groups, respectively. Late complications were 5 (6.1%) and 2 (4.9%) for conventional and peel-away groups, respectively. Mean operating time was lower in the peel-away group (P = 0.0000) and mortality was 0 for both groups. CONCLUSION: Ventriculo-atrial shunt is an effective procedure for patients with NPH. When comparing the conventional venodissection technique with a percutaneous US-guided peel-away technique, the latter offers advantages such as shorter operating time and lower perioperative complication rates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8571261
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Scientific Scholar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85712612021-11-08 Ventriculo-atrial shunt. Comparison of an ultrasound-guided peel-away technique versus conventional technique in the management of normal pressure hydrocephalus: A retrospective cohort Segura-Hernández, Andrés Hakim, Fernando Ramón, Juan F. Jiménez-Hakim, Enrique Mejía-Cordovez, Juan A. Quintero-Rueda, Diego Araque-Puello, Yessid Pedraza-Ciro, Camila Leal-Isaza, Juan P. Mendoza-Mantilla, Juliana Robles, Vanesa Gonzalez, Martina Jaramillo-Velásquez, Daniel Gómez, Diego F. Surg Neurol Int Original Article BACKGROUND: Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) is a common neurodegenerative syndrome among the elderly characterized by ventriculomegaly and the classic triad of symmetric gait disturbance, cognitive decline and urinary incontinence. To date, the only effective treatment is a cerebrospinal fluid shunting procedure that can either be ventriculo-atrial, ventriculo-peritoneal, or lumbo-peritoneal shunt. The conventional ventriculo-atrial shunt uses venodissection, whereas the peel-away is a percutaneous ultrasound (US)-guided technique that shows some advantages over conventional technique. We sought to compare perioperative complication rates, mean operating time and clinical outcomes for both techniques in NPH patients at our institution. METHODS: A retrospective cohort-type analytical study was conducted, using clinical record data of patients diagnosed with NPH and treated at our center from January 2009 to September 2019. Parameters to be compared include: Perioperative complication rates, intraoperative bleeding, mortality, and mean operating time. Perioperative complication rates are those device-related such as shunt infection, dysfunction, and those associated with the procedure. Complications are further classified in immediate (occurring during the first inpatient stay), early (within the first 30 days of surgery), and late (after day 30 of surgery). RESULTS: A total of 123 patients underwent ventriculo-atrial shunt. Eighty-two patients (67%) underwent conventional venodissection technique and 41 patients (33%) underwent a peel-away technique. Immediate complications were 3 (3.6%) and 0 for conventional and peel-away groups, respectively. Early complications were 0 and 1 (2.4%) for conventional and peel-away groups, respectively. Late complications were 5 (6.1%) and 2 (4.9%) for conventional and peel-away groups, respectively. Mean operating time was lower in the peel-away group (P = 0.0000) and mortality was 0 for both groups. CONCLUSION: Ventriculo-atrial shunt is an effective procedure for patients with NPH. When comparing the conventional venodissection technique with a percutaneous US-guided peel-away technique, the latter offers advantages such as shorter operating time and lower perioperative complication rates. Scientific Scholar 2021-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8571261/ /pubmed/34754581 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_613_2021 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Surgical Neurology International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Segura-Hernández, Andrés
Hakim, Fernando
Ramón, Juan F.
Jiménez-Hakim, Enrique
Mejía-Cordovez, Juan A.
Quintero-Rueda, Diego
Araque-Puello, Yessid
Pedraza-Ciro, Camila
Leal-Isaza, Juan P.
Mendoza-Mantilla, Juliana
Robles, Vanesa
Gonzalez, Martina
Jaramillo-Velásquez, Daniel
Gómez, Diego F.
Ventriculo-atrial shunt. Comparison of an ultrasound-guided peel-away technique versus conventional technique in the management of normal pressure hydrocephalus: A retrospective cohort
title Ventriculo-atrial shunt. Comparison of an ultrasound-guided peel-away technique versus conventional technique in the management of normal pressure hydrocephalus: A retrospective cohort
title_full Ventriculo-atrial shunt. Comparison of an ultrasound-guided peel-away technique versus conventional technique in the management of normal pressure hydrocephalus: A retrospective cohort
title_fullStr Ventriculo-atrial shunt. Comparison of an ultrasound-guided peel-away technique versus conventional technique in the management of normal pressure hydrocephalus: A retrospective cohort
title_full_unstemmed Ventriculo-atrial shunt. Comparison of an ultrasound-guided peel-away technique versus conventional technique in the management of normal pressure hydrocephalus: A retrospective cohort
title_short Ventriculo-atrial shunt. Comparison of an ultrasound-guided peel-away technique versus conventional technique in the management of normal pressure hydrocephalus: A retrospective cohort
title_sort ventriculo-atrial shunt. comparison of an ultrasound-guided peel-away technique versus conventional technique in the management of normal pressure hydrocephalus: a retrospective cohort
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8571261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34754581
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_613_2021
work_keys_str_mv AT segurahernandezandres ventriculoatrialshuntcomparisonofanultrasoundguidedpeelawaytechniqueversusconventionaltechniqueinthemanagementofnormalpressurehydrocephalusaretrospectivecohort
AT hakimfernando ventriculoatrialshuntcomparisonofanultrasoundguidedpeelawaytechniqueversusconventionaltechniqueinthemanagementofnormalpressurehydrocephalusaretrospectivecohort
AT ramonjuanf ventriculoatrialshuntcomparisonofanultrasoundguidedpeelawaytechniqueversusconventionaltechniqueinthemanagementofnormalpressurehydrocephalusaretrospectivecohort
AT jimenezhakimenrique ventriculoatrialshuntcomparisonofanultrasoundguidedpeelawaytechniqueversusconventionaltechniqueinthemanagementofnormalpressurehydrocephalusaretrospectivecohort
AT mejiacordovezjuana ventriculoatrialshuntcomparisonofanultrasoundguidedpeelawaytechniqueversusconventionaltechniqueinthemanagementofnormalpressurehydrocephalusaretrospectivecohort
AT quinteroruedadiego ventriculoatrialshuntcomparisonofanultrasoundguidedpeelawaytechniqueversusconventionaltechniqueinthemanagementofnormalpressurehydrocephalusaretrospectivecohort
AT araquepuelloyessid ventriculoatrialshuntcomparisonofanultrasoundguidedpeelawaytechniqueversusconventionaltechniqueinthemanagementofnormalpressurehydrocephalusaretrospectivecohort
AT pedrazacirocamila ventriculoatrialshuntcomparisonofanultrasoundguidedpeelawaytechniqueversusconventionaltechniqueinthemanagementofnormalpressurehydrocephalusaretrospectivecohort
AT lealisazajuanp ventriculoatrialshuntcomparisonofanultrasoundguidedpeelawaytechniqueversusconventionaltechniqueinthemanagementofnormalpressurehydrocephalusaretrospectivecohort
AT mendozamantillajuliana ventriculoatrialshuntcomparisonofanultrasoundguidedpeelawaytechniqueversusconventionaltechniqueinthemanagementofnormalpressurehydrocephalusaretrospectivecohort
AT roblesvanesa ventriculoatrialshuntcomparisonofanultrasoundguidedpeelawaytechniqueversusconventionaltechniqueinthemanagementofnormalpressurehydrocephalusaretrospectivecohort
AT gonzalezmartina ventriculoatrialshuntcomparisonofanultrasoundguidedpeelawaytechniqueversusconventionaltechniqueinthemanagementofnormalpressurehydrocephalusaretrospectivecohort
AT jaramillovelasquezdaniel ventriculoatrialshuntcomparisonofanultrasoundguidedpeelawaytechniqueversusconventionaltechniqueinthemanagementofnormalpressurehydrocephalusaretrospectivecohort
AT gomezdiegof ventriculoatrialshuntcomparisonofanultrasoundguidedpeelawaytechniqueversusconventionaltechniqueinthemanagementofnormalpressurehydrocephalusaretrospectivecohort