Cargando…
Isolated traumatic occipital condyle fractures: Is external cervical orthosis even necessary?
BACKGROUND: Occipital condyle fractures (OCFs) have been reported in up to 4–16% of individuals suffering cervical spine trauma. The current management of OCF fractures relies on a rigid cervical collar for 6 weeks or longer. Here, we calculated the rate of acute and delayed surgical intervention (o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Scientific Scholar
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8571366/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34754574 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_748_2021 |
_version_ | 1784595004980723712 |
---|---|
author | Nwachuku, Enyinna Njoku-Austin, Confidence Patel, Kevin P. Anthony, Austin W. Mittal, Aditya Hamilton, David Kojo Kanter, Adam Gerszten, Peter C. Okonkwo, David |
author_facet | Nwachuku, Enyinna Njoku-Austin, Confidence Patel, Kevin P. Anthony, Austin W. Mittal, Aditya Hamilton, David Kojo Kanter, Adam Gerszten, Peter C. Okonkwo, David |
author_sort | Nwachuku, Enyinna |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Occipital condyle fractures (OCFs) have been reported in up to 4–16% of individuals suffering cervical spine trauma. The current management of OCF fractures relies on a rigid cervical collar for 6 weeks or longer. Here, we calculated the rate of acute and delayed surgical intervention (occipitocervical fusion) for patients with isolated OCF who were managed with a cervical collar over a 10-year period at a single institution. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis performed on all patients admitted to a Level 1 Trauma Center between 2008 and 2018 who suffered traumatic isolated OCF managed with an external rigid cervical orthosis. Radiographic imaging was reviewed by several board-certified neuroradiologists. Demographic and clinical data were collected including need for occipitocervical fusion within 12 months after trauma. RESULTS: The incidence of isolated OCF was 4% (60/1536) for those patients admitted with cervical spine fractures. They averaged 49 years of age, and 58% were male falls accounted for the mechanism of injury in 47% of patients. Classification of OCF was most commonly classified in 47% as type I Anderson and Montesano fractures. Of the 60 patients who suffered isolated OCF that was managed with external cervical orthosis, 0% required occipitocervical fusion within 12 months posttrauma. About 90% were discharged, while the remaining 10% sustained traumatic brain/orthopedic injury that limited an accurate neurological assessment. CONCLUSION: Here, we documented a 4% incidence of isolated OCF in our cervical trauma population, a rate which is comparable to that found in the literature year. Most notably, we documented a 0% incidence for requiring delayed occipital-cervical fusions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8571366 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Scientific Scholar |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85713662021-11-08 Isolated traumatic occipital condyle fractures: Is external cervical orthosis even necessary? Nwachuku, Enyinna Njoku-Austin, Confidence Patel, Kevin P. Anthony, Austin W. Mittal, Aditya Hamilton, David Kojo Kanter, Adam Gerszten, Peter C. Okonkwo, David Surg Neurol Int Original Article BACKGROUND: Occipital condyle fractures (OCFs) have been reported in up to 4–16% of individuals suffering cervical spine trauma. The current management of OCF fractures relies on a rigid cervical collar for 6 weeks or longer. Here, we calculated the rate of acute and delayed surgical intervention (occipitocervical fusion) for patients with isolated OCF who were managed with a cervical collar over a 10-year period at a single institution. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis performed on all patients admitted to a Level 1 Trauma Center between 2008 and 2018 who suffered traumatic isolated OCF managed with an external rigid cervical orthosis. Radiographic imaging was reviewed by several board-certified neuroradiologists. Demographic and clinical data were collected including need for occipitocervical fusion within 12 months after trauma. RESULTS: The incidence of isolated OCF was 4% (60/1536) for those patients admitted with cervical spine fractures. They averaged 49 years of age, and 58% were male falls accounted for the mechanism of injury in 47% of patients. Classification of OCF was most commonly classified in 47% as type I Anderson and Montesano fractures. Of the 60 patients who suffered isolated OCF that was managed with external cervical orthosis, 0% required occipitocervical fusion within 12 months posttrauma. About 90% were discharged, while the remaining 10% sustained traumatic brain/orthopedic injury that limited an accurate neurological assessment. CONCLUSION: Here, we documented a 4% incidence of isolated OCF in our cervical trauma population, a rate which is comparable to that found in the literature year. Most notably, we documented a 0% incidence for requiring delayed occipital-cervical fusions. Scientific Scholar 2021-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8571366/ /pubmed/34754574 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_748_2021 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Surgical Neurology International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Nwachuku, Enyinna Njoku-Austin, Confidence Patel, Kevin P. Anthony, Austin W. Mittal, Aditya Hamilton, David Kojo Kanter, Adam Gerszten, Peter C. Okonkwo, David Isolated traumatic occipital condyle fractures: Is external cervical orthosis even necessary? |
title | Isolated traumatic occipital condyle fractures: Is external cervical orthosis even necessary? |
title_full | Isolated traumatic occipital condyle fractures: Is external cervical orthosis even necessary? |
title_fullStr | Isolated traumatic occipital condyle fractures: Is external cervical orthosis even necessary? |
title_full_unstemmed | Isolated traumatic occipital condyle fractures: Is external cervical orthosis even necessary? |
title_short | Isolated traumatic occipital condyle fractures: Is external cervical orthosis even necessary? |
title_sort | isolated traumatic occipital condyle fractures: is external cervical orthosis even necessary? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8571366/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34754574 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_748_2021 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nwachukuenyinna isolatedtraumaticoccipitalcondylefracturesisexternalcervicalorthosisevennecessary AT njokuaustinconfidence isolatedtraumaticoccipitalcondylefracturesisexternalcervicalorthosisevennecessary AT patelkevinp isolatedtraumaticoccipitalcondylefracturesisexternalcervicalorthosisevennecessary AT anthonyaustinw isolatedtraumaticoccipitalcondylefracturesisexternalcervicalorthosisevennecessary AT mittaladitya isolatedtraumaticoccipitalcondylefracturesisexternalcervicalorthosisevennecessary AT hamiltondavidkojo isolatedtraumaticoccipitalcondylefracturesisexternalcervicalorthosisevennecessary AT kanteradam isolatedtraumaticoccipitalcondylefracturesisexternalcervicalorthosisevennecessary AT gersztenpeterc isolatedtraumaticoccipitalcondylefracturesisexternalcervicalorthosisevennecessary AT okonkwodavid isolatedtraumaticoccipitalcondylefracturesisexternalcervicalorthosisevennecessary |