Cargando…

How many replicates to accurately estimate fish biodiversity using environmental DNA on coral reefs?

Quantifying fish species diversity in rich tropical marine environments remains challenging. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is a promising tool to face this challenge through the filtering, amplification, and sequencing of DNA traces from water samples. However, because eDNA concentration is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stauffer, Salomé, Jucker, Meret, Keggin, Thomas, Marques, Virginie, Andrello, Marco, Bessudo, Sandra, Cheutin, Marie‐Charlotte, Borrero‐Pérez, Giomar Helena, Richards, Eilísh, Dejean, Tony, Hocdé, Régis, Juhel, Jean‐Baptiste, Ladino, Felipe, Letessier, Tom B., Loiseau, Nicolas, Maire, Eva, Mouillot, David, Mutis Martinezguerra, Maria, Manel, Stéphanie, Polanco Fernández, Andrea, Valentini, Alice, Velez, Laure, Albouy, Camille, Pellissier, Loïc, Waldock, Conor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8571620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34765130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8150
_version_ 1784595062093512704
author Stauffer, Salomé
Jucker, Meret
Keggin, Thomas
Marques, Virginie
Andrello, Marco
Bessudo, Sandra
Cheutin, Marie‐Charlotte
Borrero‐Pérez, Giomar Helena
Richards, Eilísh
Dejean, Tony
Hocdé, Régis
Juhel, Jean‐Baptiste
Ladino, Felipe
Letessier, Tom B.
Loiseau, Nicolas
Maire, Eva
Mouillot, David
Mutis Martinezguerra, Maria
Manel, Stéphanie
Polanco Fernández, Andrea
Valentini, Alice
Velez, Laure
Albouy, Camille
Pellissier, Loïc
Waldock, Conor
author_facet Stauffer, Salomé
Jucker, Meret
Keggin, Thomas
Marques, Virginie
Andrello, Marco
Bessudo, Sandra
Cheutin, Marie‐Charlotte
Borrero‐Pérez, Giomar Helena
Richards, Eilísh
Dejean, Tony
Hocdé, Régis
Juhel, Jean‐Baptiste
Ladino, Felipe
Letessier, Tom B.
Loiseau, Nicolas
Maire, Eva
Mouillot, David
Mutis Martinezguerra, Maria
Manel, Stéphanie
Polanco Fernández, Andrea
Valentini, Alice
Velez, Laure
Albouy, Camille
Pellissier, Loïc
Waldock, Conor
author_sort Stauffer, Salomé
collection PubMed
description Quantifying fish species diversity in rich tropical marine environments remains challenging. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is a promising tool to face this challenge through the filtering, amplification, and sequencing of DNA traces from water samples. However, because eDNA concentration is low in marine environments, the reliability of eDNA to detect species diversity can be limited. Using an eDNA metabarcoding approach to identify fish Molecular Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) with a single 12S marker, we aimed to assess how the number of sampling replicates and filtered water volume affect biodiversity estimates. We used a paired sampling design of 30 L per replicate on 68 reef transects from 8 sites in 3 tropical regions. We quantified local and regional sampling variability by comparing MOTU richness, compositional turnover, and compositional nestedness. We found strong turnover of MOTUs between replicated pairs of samples undertaken in the same location, time, and conditions. Paired samples contained non‐overlapping assemblages rather than subsets of one another. As a result, non‐saturated localized diversity accumulation curves suggest that even 6 replicates (180 L) in the same location can underestimate local diversity (for an area <1 km). However, sampling regional diversity using ~25 replicates in variable locations (often covering 10 s of km) often saturated biodiversity accumulation curves. Our results demonstrate variability of diversity estimates possibly arising from heterogeneous distribution of eDNA in seawater, highly skewed frequencies of eDNA traces per MOTU, in addition to variability in eDNA processing. This high compositional variability has consequences for using eDNA to monitor temporal and spatial biodiversity changes in local assemblages. Avoiding false‐negative detections in future biomonitoring efforts requires increasing replicates or sampled water volume to better inform management of marine biodiversity using eDNA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8571620
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85716202021-11-10 How many replicates to accurately estimate fish biodiversity using environmental DNA on coral reefs? Stauffer, Salomé Jucker, Meret Keggin, Thomas Marques, Virginie Andrello, Marco Bessudo, Sandra Cheutin, Marie‐Charlotte Borrero‐Pérez, Giomar Helena Richards, Eilísh Dejean, Tony Hocdé, Régis Juhel, Jean‐Baptiste Ladino, Felipe Letessier, Tom B. Loiseau, Nicolas Maire, Eva Mouillot, David Mutis Martinezguerra, Maria Manel, Stéphanie Polanco Fernández, Andrea Valentini, Alice Velez, Laure Albouy, Camille Pellissier, Loïc Waldock, Conor Ecol Evol Research Articles Quantifying fish species diversity in rich tropical marine environments remains challenging. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is a promising tool to face this challenge through the filtering, amplification, and sequencing of DNA traces from water samples. However, because eDNA concentration is low in marine environments, the reliability of eDNA to detect species diversity can be limited. Using an eDNA metabarcoding approach to identify fish Molecular Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) with a single 12S marker, we aimed to assess how the number of sampling replicates and filtered water volume affect biodiversity estimates. We used a paired sampling design of 30 L per replicate on 68 reef transects from 8 sites in 3 tropical regions. We quantified local and regional sampling variability by comparing MOTU richness, compositional turnover, and compositional nestedness. We found strong turnover of MOTUs between replicated pairs of samples undertaken in the same location, time, and conditions. Paired samples contained non‐overlapping assemblages rather than subsets of one another. As a result, non‐saturated localized diversity accumulation curves suggest that even 6 replicates (180 L) in the same location can underestimate local diversity (for an area <1 km). However, sampling regional diversity using ~25 replicates in variable locations (often covering 10 s of km) often saturated biodiversity accumulation curves. Our results demonstrate variability of diversity estimates possibly arising from heterogeneous distribution of eDNA in seawater, highly skewed frequencies of eDNA traces per MOTU, in addition to variability in eDNA processing. This high compositional variability has consequences for using eDNA to monitor temporal and spatial biodiversity changes in local assemblages. Avoiding false‐negative detections in future biomonitoring efforts requires increasing replicates or sampled water volume to better inform management of marine biodiversity using eDNA. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8571620/ /pubmed/34765130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8150 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Stauffer, Salomé
Jucker, Meret
Keggin, Thomas
Marques, Virginie
Andrello, Marco
Bessudo, Sandra
Cheutin, Marie‐Charlotte
Borrero‐Pérez, Giomar Helena
Richards, Eilísh
Dejean, Tony
Hocdé, Régis
Juhel, Jean‐Baptiste
Ladino, Felipe
Letessier, Tom B.
Loiseau, Nicolas
Maire, Eva
Mouillot, David
Mutis Martinezguerra, Maria
Manel, Stéphanie
Polanco Fernández, Andrea
Valentini, Alice
Velez, Laure
Albouy, Camille
Pellissier, Loïc
Waldock, Conor
How many replicates to accurately estimate fish biodiversity using environmental DNA on coral reefs?
title How many replicates to accurately estimate fish biodiversity using environmental DNA on coral reefs?
title_full How many replicates to accurately estimate fish biodiversity using environmental DNA on coral reefs?
title_fullStr How many replicates to accurately estimate fish biodiversity using environmental DNA on coral reefs?
title_full_unstemmed How many replicates to accurately estimate fish biodiversity using environmental DNA on coral reefs?
title_short How many replicates to accurately estimate fish biodiversity using environmental DNA on coral reefs?
title_sort how many replicates to accurately estimate fish biodiversity using environmental dna on coral reefs?
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8571620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34765130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8150
work_keys_str_mv AT stauffersalome howmanyreplicatestoaccuratelyestimatefishbiodiversityusingenvironmentaldnaoncoralreefs
AT juckermeret howmanyreplicatestoaccuratelyestimatefishbiodiversityusingenvironmentaldnaoncoralreefs
AT kegginthomas howmanyreplicatestoaccuratelyestimatefishbiodiversityusingenvironmentaldnaoncoralreefs
AT marquesvirginie howmanyreplicatestoaccuratelyestimatefishbiodiversityusingenvironmentaldnaoncoralreefs
AT andrellomarco howmanyreplicatestoaccuratelyestimatefishbiodiversityusingenvironmentaldnaoncoralreefs
AT bessudosandra howmanyreplicatestoaccuratelyestimatefishbiodiversityusingenvironmentaldnaoncoralreefs
AT cheutinmariecharlotte howmanyreplicatestoaccuratelyestimatefishbiodiversityusingenvironmentaldnaoncoralreefs
AT borreroperezgiomarhelena howmanyreplicatestoaccuratelyestimatefishbiodiversityusingenvironmentaldnaoncoralreefs
AT richardseilish howmanyreplicatestoaccuratelyestimatefishbiodiversityusingenvironmentaldnaoncoralreefs
AT dejeantony howmanyreplicatestoaccuratelyestimatefishbiodiversityusingenvironmentaldnaoncoralreefs
AT hocderegis howmanyreplicatestoaccuratelyestimatefishbiodiversityusingenvironmentaldnaoncoralreefs
AT juheljeanbaptiste howmanyreplicatestoaccuratelyestimatefishbiodiversityusingenvironmentaldnaoncoralreefs
AT ladinofelipe howmanyreplicatestoaccuratelyestimatefishbiodiversityusingenvironmentaldnaoncoralreefs
AT letessiertomb howmanyreplicatestoaccuratelyestimatefishbiodiversityusingenvironmentaldnaoncoralreefs
AT loiseaunicolas howmanyreplicatestoaccuratelyestimatefishbiodiversityusingenvironmentaldnaoncoralreefs
AT maireeva howmanyreplicatestoaccuratelyestimatefishbiodiversityusingenvironmentaldnaoncoralreefs
AT mouillotdavid howmanyreplicatestoaccuratelyestimatefishbiodiversityusingenvironmentaldnaoncoralreefs
AT mutismartinezguerramaria howmanyreplicatestoaccuratelyestimatefishbiodiversityusingenvironmentaldnaoncoralreefs
AT manelstephanie howmanyreplicatestoaccuratelyestimatefishbiodiversityusingenvironmentaldnaoncoralreefs
AT polancofernandezandrea howmanyreplicatestoaccuratelyestimatefishbiodiversityusingenvironmentaldnaoncoralreefs
AT valentinialice howmanyreplicatestoaccuratelyestimatefishbiodiversityusingenvironmentaldnaoncoralreefs
AT velezlaure howmanyreplicatestoaccuratelyestimatefishbiodiversityusingenvironmentaldnaoncoralreefs
AT albouycamille howmanyreplicatestoaccuratelyestimatefishbiodiversityusingenvironmentaldnaoncoralreefs
AT pellissierloic howmanyreplicatestoaccuratelyestimatefishbiodiversityusingenvironmentaldnaoncoralreefs
AT waldockconor howmanyreplicatestoaccuratelyestimatefishbiodiversityusingenvironmentaldnaoncoralreefs