Cargando…

A comparative analysis of spider prey spectra analyzed through the next‐generation sequencing of individual and mixed DNA samples

As one of the most abundant predators of insects in terrestrial ecosystems, spiders have long received much attention from agricultural scientists and ecologists. Do spiders have a certain controlling effect on the main insect pests of concern in farmland ecosystems? Answering this question requires...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Tingbang, Song, Xuhao, Xu, Xiaoqin, Zhou, Caiquan, Shi, Aimin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8571630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34765189
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8252
_version_ 1784595064531451904
author Yang, Tingbang
Song, Xuhao
Xu, Xiaoqin
Zhou, Caiquan
Shi, Aimin
author_facet Yang, Tingbang
Song, Xuhao
Xu, Xiaoqin
Zhou, Caiquan
Shi, Aimin
author_sort Yang, Tingbang
collection PubMed
description As one of the most abundant predators of insects in terrestrial ecosystems, spiders have long received much attention from agricultural scientists and ecologists. Do spiders have a certain controlling effect on the main insect pests of concern in farmland ecosystems? Answering this question requires us to fully understand the prey spectrum of spiders. Next‐generation sequencing (NGS) has been successfully employed to analyze spider prey spectra. However, the high sequencing costs make it difficult to analyze the prey spectrum of various spider species with large samples in a given farmland ecosystem. We performed a comparative analysis of the prey spectra of Ovia alboannulata (Araneae, Lycosidae) using NGS with individual and mixed DNA samples to demonstrate which treatment was better for determining the spider prey spectra in the field. We collected spider individuals from tea plantations, and two treatments were then carried out: (1) The DNA was extracted from the spiders individually and then sequenced separately (DESISS) and (2) the DNA was extracted from the spiders individually and then mixed and sequenced (DESIMS). The results showed that the number of prey families obtained by the DESISS treatment was approximately twice that obtained by the DESIMS treatment. Therefore, the DESIMS treatment greatly underestimated the prey composition of the spiders, although its sequencing costs were obviously lower. However, the relative abundance of prey sequences detected in the two treatments was slightly different only at the family level. Therefore, we concluded that if our purpose were to obtain the most accurate prey spectrum of the spiders, the DESISS treatment would be the best choice. However, if our purpose were to obtain only the relative abundance of prey sequences of the spiders, the DESIMS treatment would also be an option. The present study provides an important reference for choosing applicable methods to analyze the prey spectra and food web compositions of animal in ecosystems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8571630
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85716302021-11-10 A comparative analysis of spider prey spectra analyzed through the next‐generation sequencing of individual and mixed DNA samples Yang, Tingbang Song, Xuhao Xu, Xiaoqin Zhou, Caiquan Shi, Aimin Ecol Evol Research Articles As one of the most abundant predators of insects in terrestrial ecosystems, spiders have long received much attention from agricultural scientists and ecologists. Do spiders have a certain controlling effect on the main insect pests of concern in farmland ecosystems? Answering this question requires us to fully understand the prey spectrum of spiders. Next‐generation sequencing (NGS) has been successfully employed to analyze spider prey spectra. However, the high sequencing costs make it difficult to analyze the prey spectrum of various spider species with large samples in a given farmland ecosystem. We performed a comparative analysis of the prey spectra of Ovia alboannulata (Araneae, Lycosidae) using NGS with individual and mixed DNA samples to demonstrate which treatment was better for determining the spider prey spectra in the field. We collected spider individuals from tea plantations, and two treatments were then carried out: (1) The DNA was extracted from the spiders individually and then sequenced separately (DESISS) and (2) the DNA was extracted from the spiders individually and then mixed and sequenced (DESIMS). The results showed that the number of prey families obtained by the DESISS treatment was approximately twice that obtained by the DESIMS treatment. Therefore, the DESIMS treatment greatly underestimated the prey composition of the spiders, although its sequencing costs were obviously lower. However, the relative abundance of prey sequences detected in the two treatments was slightly different only at the family level. Therefore, we concluded that if our purpose were to obtain the most accurate prey spectrum of the spiders, the DESISS treatment would be the best choice. However, if our purpose were to obtain only the relative abundance of prey sequences of the spiders, the DESIMS treatment would also be an option. The present study provides an important reference for choosing applicable methods to analyze the prey spectra and food web compositions of animal in ecosystems. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8571630/ /pubmed/34765189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8252 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Yang, Tingbang
Song, Xuhao
Xu, Xiaoqin
Zhou, Caiquan
Shi, Aimin
A comparative analysis of spider prey spectra analyzed through the next‐generation sequencing of individual and mixed DNA samples
title A comparative analysis of spider prey spectra analyzed through the next‐generation sequencing of individual and mixed DNA samples
title_full A comparative analysis of spider prey spectra analyzed through the next‐generation sequencing of individual and mixed DNA samples
title_fullStr A comparative analysis of spider prey spectra analyzed through the next‐generation sequencing of individual and mixed DNA samples
title_full_unstemmed A comparative analysis of spider prey spectra analyzed through the next‐generation sequencing of individual and mixed DNA samples
title_short A comparative analysis of spider prey spectra analyzed through the next‐generation sequencing of individual and mixed DNA samples
title_sort comparative analysis of spider prey spectra analyzed through the next‐generation sequencing of individual and mixed dna samples
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8571630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34765189
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8252
work_keys_str_mv AT yangtingbang acomparativeanalysisofspiderpreyspectraanalyzedthroughthenextgenerationsequencingofindividualandmixeddnasamples
AT songxuhao acomparativeanalysisofspiderpreyspectraanalyzedthroughthenextgenerationsequencingofindividualandmixeddnasamples
AT xuxiaoqin acomparativeanalysisofspiderpreyspectraanalyzedthroughthenextgenerationsequencingofindividualandmixeddnasamples
AT zhoucaiquan acomparativeanalysisofspiderpreyspectraanalyzedthroughthenextgenerationsequencingofindividualandmixeddnasamples
AT shiaimin acomparativeanalysisofspiderpreyspectraanalyzedthroughthenextgenerationsequencingofindividualandmixeddnasamples
AT yangtingbang comparativeanalysisofspiderpreyspectraanalyzedthroughthenextgenerationsequencingofindividualandmixeddnasamples
AT songxuhao comparativeanalysisofspiderpreyspectraanalyzedthroughthenextgenerationsequencingofindividualandmixeddnasamples
AT xuxiaoqin comparativeanalysisofspiderpreyspectraanalyzedthroughthenextgenerationsequencingofindividualandmixeddnasamples
AT zhoucaiquan comparativeanalysisofspiderpreyspectraanalyzedthroughthenextgenerationsequencingofindividualandmixeddnasamples
AT shiaimin comparativeanalysisofspiderpreyspectraanalyzedthroughthenextgenerationsequencingofindividualandmixeddnasamples