Cargando…
A comparative analysis of spider prey spectra analyzed through the next‐generation sequencing of individual and mixed DNA samples
As one of the most abundant predators of insects in terrestrial ecosystems, spiders have long received much attention from agricultural scientists and ecologists. Do spiders have a certain controlling effect on the main insect pests of concern in farmland ecosystems? Answering this question requires...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8571630/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34765189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8252 |
_version_ | 1784595064531451904 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Tingbang Song, Xuhao Xu, Xiaoqin Zhou, Caiquan Shi, Aimin |
author_facet | Yang, Tingbang Song, Xuhao Xu, Xiaoqin Zhou, Caiquan Shi, Aimin |
author_sort | Yang, Tingbang |
collection | PubMed |
description | As one of the most abundant predators of insects in terrestrial ecosystems, spiders have long received much attention from agricultural scientists and ecologists. Do spiders have a certain controlling effect on the main insect pests of concern in farmland ecosystems? Answering this question requires us to fully understand the prey spectrum of spiders. Next‐generation sequencing (NGS) has been successfully employed to analyze spider prey spectra. However, the high sequencing costs make it difficult to analyze the prey spectrum of various spider species with large samples in a given farmland ecosystem. We performed a comparative analysis of the prey spectra of Ovia alboannulata (Araneae, Lycosidae) using NGS with individual and mixed DNA samples to demonstrate which treatment was better for determining the spider prey spectra in the field. We collected spider individuals from tea plantations, and two treatments were then carried out: (1) The DNA was extracted from the spiders individually and then sequenced separately (DESISS) and (2) the DNA was extracted from the spiders individually and then mixed and sequenced (DESIMS). The results showed that the number of prey families obtained by the DESISS treatment was approximately twice that obtained by the DESIMS treatment. Therefore, the DESIMS treatment greatly underestimated the prey composition of the spiders, although its sequencing costs were obviously lower. However, the relative abundance of prey sequences detected in the two treatments was slightly different only at the family level. Therefore, we concluded that if our purpose were to obtain the most accurate prey spectrum of the spiders, the DESISS treatment would be the best choice. However, if our purpose were to obtain only the relative abundance of prey sequences of the spiders, the DESIMS treatment would also be an option. The present study provides an important reference for choosing applicable methods to analyze the prey spectra and food web compositions of animal in ecosystems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8571630 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85716302021-11-10 A comparative analysis of spider prey spectra analyzed through the next‐generation sequencing of individual and mixed DNA samples Yang, Tingbang Song, Xuhao Xu, Xiaoqin Zhou, Caiquan Shi, Aimin Ecol Evol Research Articles As one of the most abundant predators of insects in terrestrial ecosystems, spiders have long received much attention from agricultural scientists and ecologists. Do spiders have a certain controlling effect on the main insect pests of concern in farmland ecosystems? Answering this question requires us to fully understand the prey spectrum of spiders. Next‐generation sequencing (NGS) has been successfully employed to analyze spider prey spectra. However, the high sequencing costs make it difficult to analyze the prey spectrum of various spider species with large samples in a given farmland ecosystem. We performed a comparative analysis of the prey spectra of Ovia alboannulata (Araneae, Lycosidae) using NGS with individual and mixed DNA samples to demonstrate which treatment was better for determining the spider prey spectra in the field. We collected spider individuals from tea plantations, and two treatments were then carried out: (1) The DNA was extracted from the spiders individually and then sequenced separately (DESISS) and (2) the DNA was extracted from the spiders individually and then mixed and sequenced (DESIMS). The results showed that the number of prey families obtained by the DESISS treatment was approximately twice that obtained by the DESIMS treatment. Therefore, the DESIMS treatment greatly underestimated the prey composition of the spiders, although its sequencing costs were obviously lower. However, the relative abundance of prey sequences detected in the two treatments was slightly different only at the family level. Therefore, we concluded that if our purpose were to obtain the most accurate prey spectrum of the spiders, the DESISS treatment would be the best choice. However, if our purpose were to obtain only the relative abundance of prey sequences of the spiders, the DESIMS treatment would also be an option. The present study provides an important reference for choosing applicable methods to analyze the prey spectra and food web compositions of animal in ecosystems. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8571630/ /pubmed/34765189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8252 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Yang, Tingbang Song, Xuhao Xu, Xiaoqin Zhou, Caiquan Shi, Aimin A comparative analysis of spider prey spectra analyzed through the next‐generation sequencing of individual and mixed DNA samples |
title | A comparative analysis of spider prey spectra analyzed through the next‐generation sequencing of individual and mixed DNA samples |
title_full | A comparative analysis of spider prey spectra analyzed through the next‐generation sequencing of individual and mixed DNA samples |
title_fullStr | A comparative analysis of spider prey spectra analyzed through the next‐generation sequencing of individual and mixed DNA samples |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative analysis of spider prey spectra analyzed through the next‐generation sequencing of individual and mixed DNA samples |
title_short | A comparative analysis of spider prey spectra analyzed through the next‐generation sequencing of individual and mixed DNA samples |
title_sort | comparative analysis of spider prey spectra analyzed through the next‐generation sequencing of individual and mixed dna samples |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8571630/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34765189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8252 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yangtingbang acomparativeanalysisofspiderpreyspectraanalyzedthroughthenextgenerationsequencingofindividualandmixeddnasamples AT songxuhao acomparativeanalysisofspiderpreyspectraanalyzedthroughthenextgenerationsequencingofindividualandmixeddnasamples AT xuxiaoqin acomparativeanalysisofspiderpreyspectraanalyzedthroughthenextgenerationsequencingofindividualandmixeddnasamples AT zhoucaiquan acomparativeanalysisofspiderpreyspectraanalyzedthroughthenextgenerationsequencingofindividualandmixeddnasamples AT shiaimin acomparativeanalysisofspiderpreyspectraanalyzedthroughthenextgenerationsequencingofindividualandmixeddnasamples AT yangtingbang comparativeanalysisofspiderpreyspectraanalyzedthroughthenextgenerationsequencingofindividualandmixeddnasamples AT songxuhao comparativeanalysisofspiderpreyspectraanalyzedthroughthenextgenerationsequencingofindividualandmixeddnasamples AT xuxiaoqin comparativeanalysisofspiderpreyspectraanalyzedthroughthenextgenerationsequencingofindividualandmixeddnasamples AT zhoucaiquan comparativeanalysisofspiderpreyspectraanalyzedthroughthenextgenerationsequencingofindividualandmixeddnasamples AT shiaimin comparativeanalysisofspiderpreyspectraanalyzedthroughthenextgenerationsequencingofindividualandmixeddnasamples |