Cargando…
Values of Importance to Patients With Cardiovascular Disease as a Foundation for eHealth Design and Evaluation: Mixed Methods Study
BACKGROUND: eHealth interventions are developed to support and facilitate patients with lifestyle changes and self-care tasks after being diagnosed with a cardiovascular disease (CVD). Creating long-lasting effects on lifestyle change and health outcomes with eHealth interventions is challenging and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8571692/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34677130 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/33252 |
_version_ | 1784595078865485824 |
---|---|
author | Bente, Britt E Wentzel, Jobke Groeneveld, Rik GH IJzerman, Renée VH de Buisonjé, David R Breeman, Linda D Janssen, Veronica R Kraaijenhagen, Roderik Pieterse, Marcel E Evers, Andrea WM van Gemert-Pijnen, Julia EWC |
author_facet | Bente, Britt E Wentzel, Jobke Groeneveld, Rik GH IJzerman, Renée VH de Buisonjé, David R Breeman, Linda D Janssen, Veronica R Kraaijenhagen, Roderik Pieterse, Marcel E Evers, Andrea WM van Gemert-Pijnen, Julia EWC |
author_sort | Bente, Britt E |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: eHealth interventions are developed to support and facilitate patients with lifestyle changes and self-care tasks after being diagnosed with a cardiovascular disease (CVD). Creating long-lasting effects on lifestyle change and health outcomes with eHealth interventions is challenging and requires good understanding of patient values. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to identify values of importance to patients with CVD to aid in designing a technological lifestyle platform. METHODS: A mixed method design was applied, combining data from usability testing with an additional online survey study, to validate the outcomes of the usability tests. RESULTS: A total of 11 relevant patient values were identified, including the need for security, support, not wanting to feel anxious, tailoring of treatment, and personalized, accessible care. The validation survey shows that all values but one (value 9: To have extrinsic motivation to accomplish goals or activities [related to health/lifestyle]) were regarded as important/very important. A rating of very unimportant or unimportant was given by less than 2% of the respondents (value 1: 4/641, 0.6%; value 2: 10/641, 1.6%; value 3: 9/641, 1.4%; value 4: 5/641, 0.8%; value 5: 10/641, 1.6%; value 6: 4/641, 0.6%; value 7: 10/639, 1.6%; value 8: 4/639, 0.6%; value 10: 3/636, 0.5%; value 11: 4/636, 0.6%) to all values except but one (value 9: 56/636, 8.8%). CONCLUSIONS: There is a high consensus among patients regarding the identified values reflecting goals and themes central to their lives, while living with or managing their CVD. The identified values can serve as a foundation for future research to translate and integrate these values into the design of the eHealth technology. This may call for prioritization of values, as not all values can be met equally. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8571692 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85716922021-11-19 Values of Importance to Patients With Cardiovascular Disease as a Foundation for eHealth Design and Evaluation: Mixed Methods Study Bente, Britt E Wentzel, Jobke Groeneveld, Rik GH IJzerman, Renée VH de Buisonjé, David R Breeman, Linda D Janssen, Veronica R Kraaijenhagen, Roderik Pieterse, Marcel E Evers, Andrea WM van Gemert-Pijnen, Julia EWC JMIR Cardio Original Paper BACKGROUND: eHealth interventions are developed to support and facilitate patients with lifestyle changes and self-care tasks after being diagnosed with a cardiovascular disease (CVD). Creating long-lasting effects on lifestyle change and health outcomes with eHealth interventions is challenging and requires good understanding of patient values. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to identify values of importance to patients with CVD to aid in designing a technological lifestyle platform. METHODS: A mixed method design was applied, combining data from usability testing with an additional online survey study, to validate the outcomes of the usability tests. RESULTS: A total of 11 relevant patient values were identified, including the need for security, support, not wanting to feel anxious, tailoring of treatment, and personalized, accessible care. The validation survey shows that all values but one (value 9: To have extrinsic motivation to accomplish goals or activities [related to health/lifestyle]) were regarded as important/very important. A rating of very unimportant or unimportant was given by less than 2% of the respondents (value 1: 4/641, 0.6%; value 2: 10/641, 1.6%; value 3: 9/641, 1.4%; value 4: 5/641, 0.8%; value 5: 10/641, 1.6%; value 6: 4/641, 0.6%; value 7: 10/639, 1.6%; value 8: 4/639, 0.6%; value 10: 3/636, 0.5%; value 11: 4/636, 0.6%) to all values except but one (value 9: 56/636, 8.8%). CONCLUSIONS: There is a high consensus among patients regarding the identified values reflecting goals and themes central to their lives, while living with or managing their CVD. The identified values can serve as a foundation for future research to translate and integrate these values into the design of the eHealth technology. This may call for prioritization of values, as not all values can be met equally. JMIR Publications 2021-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8571692/ /pubmed/34677130 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/33252 Text en ©Britt E Bente, Jobke Wentzel, Rik GH Groeneveld, Renée VH IJzerman, David R de Buisonjé, Linda D Breeman, Veronica R Janssen, Roderik Kraaijenhagen, Marcel E Pieterse, Andrea WM Evers, Julia EWC van Gemert-Pijnen. Originally published in JMIR Cardio (https://cardio.jmir.org), 22.10.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Cardio, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://cardio.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Bente, Britt E Wentzel, Jobke Groeneveld, Rik GH IJzerman, Renée VH de Buisonjé, David R Breeman, Linda D Janssen, Veronica R Kraaijenhagen, Roderik Pieterse, Marcel E Evers, Andrea WM van Gemert-Pijnen, Julia EWC Values of Importance to Patients With Cardiovascular Disease as a Foundation for eHealth Design and Evaluation: Mixed Methods Study |
title | Values of Importance to Patients With Cardiovascular Disease as a Foundation for eHealth Design and Evaluation: Mixed Methods Study |
title_full | Values of Importance to Patients With Cardiovascular Disease as a Foundation for eHealth Design and Evaluation: Mixed Methods Study |
title_fullStr | Values of Importance to Patients With Cardiovascular Disease as a Foundation for eHealth Design and Evaluation: Mixed Methods Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Values of Importance to Patients With Cardiovascular Disease as a Foundation for eHealth Design and Evaluation: Mixed Methods Study |
title_short | Values of Importance to Patients With Cardiovascular Disease as a Foundation for eHealth Design and Evaluation: Mixed Methods Study |
title_sort | values of importance to patients with cardiovascular disease as a foundation for ehealth design and evaluation: mixed methods study |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8571692/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34677130 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/33252 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bentebritte valuesofimportancetopatientswithcardiovasculardiseaseasafoundationforehealthdesignandevaluationmixedmethodsstudy AT wentzeljobke valuesofimportancetopatientswithcardiovasculardiseaseasafoundationforehealthdesignandevaluationmixedmethodsstudy AT groeneveldrikgh valuesofimportancetopatientswithcardiovasculardiseaseasafoundationforehealthdesignandevaluationmixedmethodsstudy AT ijzermanreneevh valuesofimportancetopatientswithcardiovasculardiseaseasafoundationforehealthdesignandevaluationmixedmethodsstudy AT debuisonjedavidr valuesofimportancetopatientswithcardiovasculardiseaseasafoundationforehealthdesignandevaluationmixedmethodsstudy AT breemanlindad valuesofimportancetopatientswithcardiovasculardiseaseasafoundationforehealthdesignandevaluationmixedmethodsstudy AT janssenveronicar valuesofimportancetopatientswithcardiovasculardiseaseasafoundationforehealthdesignandevaluationmixedmethodsstudy AT kraaijenhagenroderik valuesofimportancetopatientswithcardiovasculardiseaseasafoundationforehealthdesignandevaluationmixedmethodsstudy AT pietersemarcele valuesofimportancetopatientswithcardiovasculardiseaseasafoundationforehealthdesignandevaluationmixedmethodsstudy AT eversandreawm valuesofimportancetopatientswithcardiovasculardiseaseasafoundationforehealthdesignandevaluationmixedmethodsstudy AT vangemertpijnenjuliaewc valuesofimportancetopatientswithcardiovasculardiseaseasafoundationforehealthdesignandevaluationmixedmethodsstudy |