Cargando…

An empirical analysis of the impact of income inequality and social capital on physical and mental health - take China’s micro-database analysis as an example

BACKGROUND: Income inequality is one of the important reflections of the unbalanced development of the world economy and can have adverse effects on physical and mental health. METHODS: This article used the 2018 China Family Panel Studies Database as an empirical analysis data source. The Kakwani i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Yuanyuan, Zhou, Lulin, Li, Junshan, Wu, Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8571851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34742299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-021-01560-w
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Income inequality is one of the important reflections of the unbalanced development of the world economy and can have adverse effects on physical and mental health. METHODS: This article used the 2018 China Family Panel Studies Database as an empirical analysis data source. The Kakwani index (KI) was used to measure income inequality, and social capital was broken into cognitive social capital and structural social capital. Our assessment was conducted by using STATA16 software for ordered logistic regression, verifying income inequality, social capital on correlation between physical and mental health firstly; then by gradual regression methods to verify intermediary effect, and demonstrate the social capital as an intermediary variable affecting physical and mental health as income inequality. RESULT: The income inequality has a significant negative effect on physical and mental health (β = − 0.964, − 0.381; OR = 0.382, 0.758; P < 0.01), Social capital has a significant effect on physical and mental health (Cognitive SC(MH): β = 0.146 and 0.104, OR = 1.157 and 1.110, P < 0.01; Cognitive SC(PH): β = 0.046 and 0.069, OR = 1.047 and 1.071, P < 0.01; Structural SC(MH): β = − 0.005, 0.025 and 0.015, OR = 0.995, 1.025 and 1.015, P > 0.1, P < 0.01 and P < 0.01; Structural SC(PH): β = − 0.026, 0.009 and − 0.013, OR = 0.975, 1.009 and 0.987, P < 0.01, P > 0.1 and P < 0.01). Our analysis also showed that social capital (cognitive social capital and structural social capital) has an intermediary effect on physical and mental health due to income inequality. CONCLUSION: This study shows that income inequality can not only directly affect physical and mental health, but also through social capital intermediary utility indirectly affect physical and mental health, social capital has positive effects on physical and mental health. At the same time, income inequality and social capital’s effects on physical and mental health exist regional differences, urban-rural differences, and gender differences. Therefore, in the development of special policies to support and take care of vulnerable groups, special attention needs to be paid to poor rural areas and female groups. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12939-021-01560-w.