Cargando…
Mechanistically informed non-invasive peripheral nerve stimulation for peripheral neuropathic pain: a randomised double-blind sham-controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Induction of long-term synaptic depression (LTD) is proposed as a treatment mechanism for chronic pain but remains untested in clinical populations. Two interlinked studies; (1) A patient-assessor blinded, randomised, sham-controlled clinical trial and (2) an open-label mechanistic study...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8572078/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34742297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-021-03128-2 |
_version_ | 1784595154262294528 |
---|---|
author | Johnson, Selina Marshall, Anne Hughes, Dyfrig Holmes, Emily Henrich, Florian Nurmikko, Turo Sharma, Manohar Frank, Bernhard Bassett, Paul Marshall, Andrew Magerl, Walter Goebel, Andreas |
author_facet | Johnson, Selina Marshall, Anne Hughes, Dyfrig Holmes, Emily Henrich, Florian Nurmikko, Turo Sharma, Manohar Frank, Bernhard Bassett, Paul Marshall, Andrew Magerl, Walter Goebel, Andreas |
author_sort | Johnson, Selina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Induction of long-term synaptic depression (LTD) is proposed as a treatment mechanism for chronic pain but remains untested in clinical populations. Two interlinked studies; (1) A patient-assessor blinded, randomised, sham-controlled clinical trial and (2) an open-label mechanistic study, sought to examine therapeutic LTD for persons with chronic peripheral nerve injury pain. METHODS: (1) Patients were randomised using a concealed, computer-generated schedule to either active or sham non-invasive low-frequency nerve stimulation (LFS), for 3 months (minimum 10 min/day). The primary outcome was average pain intensity (0–10 Likert scale) recorded over 1 week, at 3 months, compared between study groups. (2) On trial completion, consenting subjects entered a mechanistic study assessing somatosensory changes in response to LFS. RESULTS: (1) 76 patients were randomised (38 per group), with 65 (31 active, 34 sham) included in the intention to treat analysis. The primary outcome was not significant, pain scores were 0.3 units lower in active group (95% CI − 1.0, 0.3; p = 0.30) giving an effect size of 0.19 (Cohen’s D). Two non-device related serious adverse events were reported. (2) In the mechanistic study (n = 19) primary outcomes of mechanical pain sensitivity (p = 0.006) and dynamic mechanical allodynia (p = 0.043) significantly improved indicating reduced mechanical hyperalgesia. CONCLUSIONS: Results from the RCT failed to reach significance. Results from the mechanistic study provide new evidence for effective induction of LTD in a clinical population. Taken together results add to mechanistic understanding of LTD and help inform future study design and approaches to treatment. Trial registration ISRCTN53432663. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8572078 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85720782021-11-08 Mechanistically informed non-invasive peripheral nerve stimulation for peripheral neuropathic pain: a randomised double-blind sham-controlled trial Johnson, Selina Marshall, Anne Hughes, Dyfrig Holmes, Emily Henrich, Florian Nurmikko, Turo Sharma, Manohar Frank, Bernhard Bassett, Paul Marshall, Andrew Magerl, Walter Goebel, Andreas J Transl Med Research BACKGROUND: Induction of long-term synaptic depression (LTD) is proposed as a treatment mechanism for chronic pain but remains untested in clinical populations. Two interlinked studies; (1) A patient-assessor blinded, randomised, sham-controlled clinical trial and (2) an open-label mechanistic study, sought to examine therapeutic LTD for persons with chronic peripheral nerve injury pain. METHODS: (1) Patients were randomised using a concealed, computer-generated schedule to either active or sham non-invasive low-frequency nerve stimulation (LFS), for 3 months (minimum 10 min/day). The primary outcome was average pain intensity (0–10 Likert scale) recorded over 1 week, at 3 months, compared between study groups. (2) On trial completion, consenting subjects entered a mechanistic study assessing somatosensory changes in response to LFS. RESULTS: (1) 76 patients were randomised (38 per group), with 65 (31 active, 34 sham) included in the intention to treat analysis. The primary outcome was not significant, pain scores were 0.3 units lower in active group (95% CI − 1.0, 0.3; p = 0.30) giving an effect size of 0.19 (Cohen’s D). Two non-device related serious adverse events were reported. (2) In the mechanistic study (n = 19) primary outcomes of mechanical pain sensitivity (p = 0.006) and dynamic mechanical allodynia (p = 0.043) significantly improved indicating reduced mechanical hyperalgesia. CONCLUSIONS: Results from the RCT failed to reach significance. Results from the mechanistic study provide new evidence for effective induction of LTD in a clinical population. Taken together results add to mechanistic understanding of LTD and help inform future study design and approaches to treatment. Trial registration ISRCTN53432663. BioMed Central 2021-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8572078/ /pubmed/34742297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-021-03128-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Johnson, Selina Marshall, Anne Hughes, Dyfrig Holmes, Emily Henrich, Florian Nurmikko, Turo Sharma, Manohar Frank, Bernhard Bassett, Paul Marshall, Andrew Magerl, Walter Goebel, Andreas Mechanistically informed non-invasive peripheral nerve stimulation for peripheral neuropathic pain: a randomised double-blind sham-controlled trial |
title | Mechanistically informed non-invasive peripheral nerve stimulation for peripheral neuropathic pain: a randomised double-blind sham-controlled trial |
title_full | Mechanistically informed non-invasive peripheral nerve stimulation for peripheral neuropathic pain: a randomised double-blind sham-controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Mechanistically informed non-invasive peripheral nerve stimulation for peripheral neuropathic pain: a randomised double-blind sham-controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Mechanistically informed non-invasive peripheral nerve stimulation for peripheral neuropathic pain: a randomised double-blind sham-controlled trial |
title_short | Mechanistically informed non-invasive peripheral nerve stimulation for peripheral neuropathic pain: a randomised double-blind sham-controlled trial |
title_sort | mechanistically informed non-invasive peripheral nerve stimulation for peripheral neuropathic pain: a randomised double-blind sham-controlled trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8572078/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34742297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-021-03128-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johnsonselina mechanisticallyinformednoninvasiveperipheralnervestimulationforperipheralneuropathicpainarandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial AT marshallanne mechanisticallyinformednoninvasiveperipheralnervestimulationforperipheralneuropathicpainarandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial AT hughesdyfrig mechanisticallyinformednoninvasiveperipheralnervestimulationforperipheralneuropathicpainarandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial AT holmesemily mechanisticallyinformednoninvasiveperipheralnervestimulationforperipheralneuropathicpainarandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial AT henrichflorian mechanisticallyinformednoninvasiveperipheralnervestimulationforperipheralneuropathicpainarandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial AT nurmikkoturo mechanisticallyinformednoninvasiveperipheralnervestimulationforperipheralneuropathicpainarandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial AT sharmamanohar mechanisticallyinformednoninvasiveperipheralnervestimulationforperipheralneuropathicpainarandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial AT frankbernhard mechanisticallyinformednoninvasiveperipheralnervestimulationforperipheralneuropathicpainarandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial AT bassettpaul mechanisticallyinformednoninvasiveperipheralnervestimulationforperipheralneuropathicpainarandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial AT marshallandrew mechanisticallyinformednoninvasiveperipheralnervestimulationforperipheralneuropathicpainarandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial AT magerlwalter mechanisticallyinformednoninvasiveperipheralnervestimulationforperipheralneuropathicpainarandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial AT goebelandreas mechanisticallyinformednoninvasiveperipheralnervestimulationforperipheralneuropathicpainarandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial |