Cargando…

Mechanistically informed non-invasive peripheral nerve stimulation for peripheral neuropathic pain: a randomised double-blind sham-controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Induction of long-term synaptic depression (LTD) is proposed as a treatment mechanism for chronic pain but remains untested in clinical populations. Two interlinked studies; (1) A patient-assessor blinded, randomised, sham-controlled clinical trial and (2) an open-label mechanistic study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnson, Selina, Marshall, Anne, Hughes, Dyfrig, Holmes, Emily, Henrich, Florian, Nurmikko, Turo, Sharma, Manohar, Frank, Bernhard, Bassett, Paul, Marshall, Andrew, Magerl, Walter, Goebel, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8572078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34742297
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-021-03128-2
_version_ 1784595154262294528
author Johnson, Selina
Marshall, Anne
Hughes, Dyfrig
Holmes, Emily
Henrich, Florian
Nurmikko, Turo
Sharma, Manohar
Frank, Bernhard
Bassett, Paul
Marshall, Andrew
Magerl, Walter
Goebel, Andreas
author_facet Johnson, Selina
Marshall, Anne
Hughes, Dyfrig
Holmes, Emily
Henrich, Florian
Nurmikko, Turo
Sharma, Manohar
Frank, Bernhard
Bassett, Paul
Marshall, Andrew
Magerl, Walter
Goebel, Andreas
author_sort Johnson, Selina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Induction of long-term synaptic depression (LTD) is proposed as a treatment mechanism for chronic pain but remains untested in clinical populations. Two interlinked studies; (1) A patient-assessor blinded, randomised, sham-controlled clinical trial and (2) an open-label mechanistic study, sought to examine therapeutic LTD for persons with chronic peripheral nerve injury pain. METHODS: (1) Patients were randomised using a concealed, computer-generated schedule to either active or sham non-invasive low-frequency nerve stimulation (LFS), for 3 months (minimum 10 min/day). The primary outcome was average pain intensity (0–10 Likert scale) recorded over 1 week, at 3 months, compared between study groups. (2) On trial completion, consenting subjects entered a mechanistic study assessing somatosensory changes in response to LFS. RESULTS: (1) 76 patients were randomised (38 per group), with 65 (31 active, 34 sham) included in the intention to treat analysis. The primary outcome was not significant, pain scores were 0.3 units lower in active group (95% CI − 1.0, 0.3; p = 0.30) giving an effect size of 0.19 (Cohen’s D). Two non-device related serious adverse events were reported. (2) In the mechanistic study (n = 19) primary outcomes of mechanical pain sensitivity (p = 0.006) and dynamic mechanical allodynia (p = 0.043) significantly improved indicating reduced mechanical hyperalgesia. CONCLUSIONS: Results from the RCT failed to reach significance. Results from the mechanistic study provide new evidence for effective induction of LTD in a clinical population. Taken together results add to mechanistic understanding of LTD and help inform future study design and approaches to treatment. Trial registration ISRCTN53432663.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8572078
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85720782021-11-08 Mechanistically informed non-invasive peripheral nerve stimulation for peripheral neuropathic pain: a randomised double-blind sham-controlled trial Johnson, Selina Marshall, Anne Hughes, Dyfrig Holmes, Emily Henrich, Florian Nurmikko, Turo Sharma, Manohar Frank, Bernhard Bassett, Paul Marshall, Andrew Magerl, Walter Goebel, Andreas J Transl Med Research BACKGROUND: Induction of long-term synaptic depression (LTD) is proposed as a treatment mechanism for chronic pain but remains untested in clinical populations. Two interlinked studies; (1) A patient-assessor blinded, randomised, sham-controlled clinical trial and (2) an open-label mechanistic study, sought to examine therapeutic LTD for persons with chronic peripheral nerve injury pain. METHODS: (1) Patients were randomised using a concealed, computer-generated schedule to either active or sham non-invasive low-frequency nerve stimulation (LFS), for 3 months (minimum 10 min/day). The primary outcome was average pain intensity (0–10 Likert scale) recorded over 1 week, at 3 months, compared between study groups. (2) On trial completion, consenting subjects entered a mechanistic study assessing somatosensory changes in response to LFS. RESULTS: (1) 76 patients were randomised (38 per group), with 65 (31 active, 34 sham) included in the intention to treat analysis. The primary outcome was not significant, pain scores were 0.3 units lower in active group (95% CI − 1.0, 0.3; p = 0.30) giving an effect size of 0.19 (Cohen’s D). Two non-device related serious adverse events were reported. (2) In the mechanistic study (n = 19) primary outcomes of mechanical pain sensitivity (p = 0.006) and dynamic mechanical allodynia (p = 0.043) significantly improved indicating reduced mechanical hyperalgesia. CONCLUSIONS: Results from the RCT failed to reach significance. Results from the mechanistic study provide new evidence for effective induction of LTD in a clinical population. Taken together results add to mechanistic understanding of LTD and help inform future study design and approaches to treatment. Trial registration ISRCTN53432663. BioMed Central 2021-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8572078/ /pubmed/34742297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-021-03128-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Johnson, Selina
Marshall, Anne
Hughes, Dyfrig
Holmes, Emily
Henrich, Florian
Nurmikko, Turo
Sharma, Manohar
Frank, Bernhard
Bassett, Paul
Marshall, Andrew
Magerl, Walter
Goebel, Andreas
Mechanistically informed non-invasive peripheral nerve stimulation for peripheral neuropathic pain: a randomised double-blind sham-controlled trial
title Mechanistically informed non-invasive peripheral nerve stimulation for peripheral neuropathic pain: a randomised double-blind sham-controlled trial
title_full Mechanistically informed non-invasive peripheral nerve stimulation for peripheral neuropathic pain: a randomised double-blind sham-controlled trial
title_fullStr Mechanistically informed non-invasive peripheral nerve stimulation for peripheral neuropathic pain: a randomised double-blind sham-controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Mechanistically informed non-invasive peripheral nerve stimulation for peripheral neuropathic pain: a randomised double-blind sham-controlled trial
title_short Mechanistically informed non-invasive peripheral nerve stimulation for peripheral neuropathic pain: a randomised double-blind sham-controlled trial
title_sort mechanistically informed non-invasive peripheral nerve stimulation for peripheral neuropathic pain: a randomised double-blind sham-controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8572078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34742297
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-021-03128-2
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsonselina mechanisticallyinformednoninvasiveperipheralnervestimulationforperipheralneuropathicpainarandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial
AT marshallanne mechanisticallyinformednoninvasiveperipheralnervestimulationforperipheralneuropathicpainarandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial
AT hughesdyfrig mechanisticallyinformednoninvasiveperipheralnervestimulationforperipheralneuropathicpainarandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial
AT holmesemily mechanisticallyinformednoninvasiveperipheralnervestimulationforperipheralneuropathicpainarandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial
AT henrichflorian mechanisticallyinformednoninvasiveperipheralnervestimulationforperipheralneuropathicpainarandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial
AT nurmikkoturo mechanisticallyinformednoninvasiveperipheralnervestimulationforperipheralneuropathicpainarandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial
AT sharmamanohar mechanisticallyinformednoninvasiveperipheralnervestimulationforperipheralneuropathicpainarandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial
AT frankbernhard mechanisticallyinformednoninvasiveperipheralnervestimulationforperipheralneuropathicpainarandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial
AT bassettpaul mechanisticallyinformednoninvasiveperipheralnervestimulationforperipheralneuropathicpainarandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial
AT marshallandrew mechanisticallyinformednoninvasiveperipheralnervestimulationforperipheralneuropathicpainarandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial
AT magerlwalter mechanisticallyinformednoninvasiveperipheralnervestimulationforperipheralneuropathicpainarandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial
AT goebelandreas mechanisticallyinformednoninvasiveperipheralnervestimulationforperipheralneuropathicpainarandomiseddoubleblindshamcontrolledtrial