Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of custom-made insoles versus usual care in patients with plantar heel pain in primary care: cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of custom-made insoles compared with general practitioner (GP)-led usual care after 26 weeks of follow-up in individuals with plantar heel pain (PHP) from a societal perspective. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis of a double-blinded randomised control...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rasenberg, Nadine, van Middelkoop, Marienke, Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita M A, El Alili, Mohamed, Bindels, Patrick, Bosmans, J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8572391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34732484
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051866
_version_ 1784595205595332608
author Rasenberg, Nadine
van Middelkoop, Marienke
Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita M A
El Alili, Mohamed
Bindels, Patrick
Bosmans, J
author_facet Rasenberg, Nadine
van Middelkoop, Marienke
Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita M A
El Alili, Mohamed
Bindels, Patrick
Bosmans, J
author_sort Rasenberg, Nadine
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of custom-made insoles compared with general practitioner (GP)-led usual care after 26 weeks of follow-up in individuals with plantar heel pain (PHP) from a societal perspective. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis of a double-blinded randomised controlled trial. SETTING: General practice in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: 116 participants with PHP for at least 2 weeks, aged 18–65 years and presenting to the GP. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomised to GP-led usual care (n=46) or referral to a podiatrist for treatment with a custom-made insole (n=70). Participant randomised to a sham insole (n=69) were excluded from this analysis. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Outcomes comprised pain during rest and activity, and quality of life. Costs included healthcare and lost productivity costs. Statistical uncertainty was estimated using bootstrapping and presented using cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. RESULTS: Participants in the custom-made insole group experienced statistically significant more pain during activity at 26 weeks than participants in the usual care group (overall effect 1.06; 95% CI 0.36 to 1.75). There were no significant differences between groups in other outcomes. Total societal costs in the custom-made insole group were non-significantly higher than in the usual care group (mean difference €376; 95% CI −€1775 to €2038). The intervention with custom-made insoles was dominated by usual care by the GP (ie, more expensive and less effective) for pain during activity and quality of life outcomes. For the outcome pain at rest, the intervention was more expensive and more effective than usual care. However, the maximum probability of cost-effectiveness was only 0.59 at very high ceiling ratios. CONCLUSIONS: These findings show that that custom-made insoles are not cost-effective in comparison with GP-led usual care. Clinicians should be reserved in prescribing custom-made insoles for PHP as a primary intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR5346.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8572391
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85723912021-11-17 Cost-effectiveness of custom-made insoles versus usual care in patients with plantar heel pain in primary care: cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomised controlled trial Rasenberg, Nadine van Middelkoop, Marienke Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita M A El Alili, Mohamed Bindels, Patrick Bosmans, J BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of custom-made insoles compared with general practitioner (GP)-led usual care after 26 weeks of follow-up in individuals with plantar heel pain (PHP) from a societal perspective. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis of a double-blinded randomised controlled trial. SETTING: General practice in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: 116 participants with PHP for at least 2 weeks, aged 18–65 years and presenting to the GP. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomised to GP-led usual care (n=46) or referral to a podiatrist for treatment with a custom-made insole (n=70). Participant randomised to a sham insole (n=69) were excluded from this analysis. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Outcomes comprised pain during rest and activity, and quality of life. Costs included healthcare and lost productivity costs. Statistical uncertainty was estimated using bootstrapping and presented using cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. RESULTS: Participants in the custom-made insole group experienced statistically significant more pain during activity at 26 weeks than participants in the usual care group (overall effect 1.06; 95% CI 0.36 to 1.75). There were no significant differences between groups in other outcomes. Total societal costs in the custom-made insole group were non-significantly higher than in the usual care group (mean difference €376; 95% CI −€1775 to €2038). The intervention with custom-made insoles was dominated by usual care by the GP (ie, more expensive and less effective) for pain during activity and quality of life outcomes. For the outcome pain at rest, the intervention was more expensive and more effective than usual care. However, the maximum probability of cost-effectiveness was only 0.59 at very high ceiling ratios. CONCLUSIONS: These findings show that that custom-made insoles are not cost-effective in comparison with GP-led usual care. Clinicians should be reserved in prescribing custom-made insoles for PHP as a primary intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR5346. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8572391/ /pubmed/34732484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051866 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle General practice / Family practice
Rasenberg, Nadine
van Middelkoop, Marienke
Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita M A
El Alili, Mohamed
Bindels, Patrick
Bosmans, J
Cost-effectiveness of custom-made insoles versus usual care in patients with plantar heel pain in primary care: cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomised controlled trial
title Cost-effectiveness of custom-made insoles versus usual care in patients with plantar heel pain in primary care: cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomised controlled trial
title_full Cost-effectiveness of custom-made insoles versus usual care in patients with plantar heel pain in primary care: cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of custom-made insoles versus usual care in patients with plantar heel pain in primary care: cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of custom-made insoles versus usual care in patients with plantar heel pain in primary care: cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomised controlled trial
title_short Cost-effectiveness of custom-made insoles versus usual care in patients with plantar heel pain in primary care: cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomised controlled trial
title_sort cost-effectiveness of custom-made insoles versus usual care in patients with plantar heel pain in primary care: cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomised controlled trial
topic General practice / Family practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8572391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34732484
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051866
work_keys_str_mv AT rasenbergnadine costeffectivenessofcustommadeinsolesversususualcareinpatientswithplantarheelpaininprimarycarecosteffectivenessanalysisofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vanmiddelkoopmarienke costeffectivenessofcustommadeinsolesversususualcareinpatientswithplantarheelpaininprimarycarecosteffectivenessanalysisofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT biermazeinstrasitama costeffectivenessofcustommadeinsolesversususualcareinpatientswithplantarheelpaininprimarycarecosteffectivenessanalysisofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT elalilimohamed costeffectivenessofcustommadeinsolesversususualcareinpatientswithplantarheelpaininprimarycarecosteffectivenessanalysisofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bindelspatrick costeffectivenessofcustommadeinsolesversususualcareinpatientswithplantarheelpaininprimarycarecosteffectivenessanalysisofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bosmansj costeffectivenessofcustommadeinsolesversususualcareinpatientswithplantarheelpaininprimarycarecosteffectivenessanalysisofarandomisedcontrolledtrial