Cargando…

Healthcare utilisation of patients with cholecystolithiasis in primary care: a multipractice comparative analysis

OBJECTIVES: To examine general practitioners’ (GP) management of cholecystolithiasis and to evaluate persisting abdominal complaints in the years after the diagnosis. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of registry data and a subset of individual medical records. SETTING: Seventeen primary care practices...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thunnissen, Floris Martijn, Drager, Luuk David, Braak, Breg, Drenth, Joost P H, van Laarhoven, Cornelis J H M, Schers, Henk J, de Reuver, Philip R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8572399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34732495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053188
_version_ 1784595207237402624
author Thunnissen, Floris Martijn
Drager, Luuk David
Braak, Breg
Drenth, Joost P H
van Laarhoven, Cornelis J H M
Schers, Henk J
de Reuver, Philip R
author_facet Thunnissen, Floris Martijn
Drager, Luuk David
Braak, Breg
Drenth, Joost P H
van Laarhoven, Cornelis J H M
Schers, Henk J
de Reuver, Philip R
author_sort Thunnissen, Floris Martijn
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To examine general practitioners’ (GP) management of cholecystolithiasis and to evaluate persisting abdominal complaints in the years after the diagnosis. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of registry data and a subset of individual medical records. SETTING: Seventeen primary care practices affiliated with the Radboudumc Practice Based Research Network in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: 633 patients with cholecystolithiasis diagnosed between 2012 and 2016. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome of this study was the healthcare utilisation of patients with cholecystolithiasis diagnosed by the GP in terms of referrals to secondary care, laboratory diagnostics, prescribed medication and the prevalence of concomitant abdominal-related diagnoses in a time interval of 3 years before and 3 years after diagnosis of cholecystolithiasis. For secondary outcomes, electronic medical records were studied from seven practices to assess emergency department visits, operation rates and repeat visits for persistent abdominal symptoms. We compared the non-referred group with the referred group. RESULTS: In 57% of patients, concomitant abdominal-related diagnoses were recorded besides the diagnosis cholecystolithiasis. In-depth analyses of 294 patients showed a referral rate of 79.3% (n=233); 62.9% (n=185) underwent cholecystectomy. After referral, 55.4% (129/233) returned to the GP for persistent abdominal symptoms. Patients returning after referral were more often treated for another abdominal-related diagnosis before cholecystolithiasis was recorded (51.9% vs 28.8%, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients in general practice with gallstones are referred and undergo cholecystectomy. Patients with concomitant abdominal-related diagnoses are likely to return to their physician. GPs should inform patients about these outcomes to improve the shared decision-making process before gallbladder surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8572399
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85723992021-11-17 Healthcare utilisation of patients with cholecystolithiasis in primary care: a multipractice comparative analysis Thunnissen, Floris Martijn Drager, Luuk David Braak, Breg Drenth, Joost P H van Laarhoven, Cornelis J H M Schers, Henk J de Reuver, Philip R BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVES: To examine general practitioners’ (GP) management of cholecystolithiasis and to evaluate persisting abdominal complaints in the years after the diagnosis. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of registry data and a subset of individual medical records. SETTING: Seventeen primary care practices affiliated with the Radboudumc Practice Based Research Network in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: 633 patients with cholecystolithiasis diagnosed between 2012 and 2016. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome of this study was the healthcare utilisation of patients with cholecystolithiasis diagnosed by the GP in terms of referrals to secondary care, laboratory diagnostics, prescribed medication and the prevalence of concomitant abdominal-related diagnoses in a time interval of 3 years before and 3 years after diagnosis of cholecystolithiasis. For secondary outcomes, electronic medical records were studied from seven practices to assess emergency department visits, operation rates and repeat visits for persistent abdominal symptoms. We compared the non-referred group with the referred group. RESULTS: In 57% of patients, concomitant abdominal-related diagnoses were recorded besides the diagnosis cholecystolithiasis. In-depth analyses of 294 patients showed a referral rate of 79.3% (n=233); 62.9% (n=185) underwent cholecystectomy. After referral, 55.4% (129/233) returned to the GP for persistent abdominal symptoms. Patients returning after referral were more often treated for another abdominal-related diagnosis before cholecystolithiasis was recorded (51.9% vs 28.8%, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients in general practice with gallstones are referred and undergo cholecystectomy. Patients with concomitant abdominal-related diagnoses are likely to return to their physician. GPs should inform patients about these outcomes to improve the shared decision-making process before gallbladder surgery. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8572399/ /pubmed/34732495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053188 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle General practice / Family practice
Thunnissen, Floris Martijn
Drager, Luuk David
Braak, Breg
Drenth, Joost P H
van Laarhoven, Cornelis J H M
Schers, Henk J
de Reuver, Philip R
Healthcare utilisation of patients with cholecystolithiasis in primary care: a multipractice comparative analysis
title Healthcare utilisation of patients with cholecystolithiasis in primary care: a multipractice comparative analysis
title_full Healthcare utilisation of patients with cholecystolithiasis in primary care: a multipractice comparative analysis
title_fullStr Healthcare utilisation of patients with cholecystolithiasis in primary care: a multipractice comparative analysis
title_full_unstemmed Healthcare utilisation of patients with cholecystolithiasis in primary care: a multipractice comparative analysis
title_short Healthcare utilisation of patients with cholecystolithiasis in primary care: a multipractice comparative analysis
title_sort healthcare utilisation of patients with cholecystolithiasis in primary care: a multipractice comparative analysis
topic General practice / Family practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8572399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34732495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053188
work_keys_str_mv AT thunnissenflorismartijn healthcareutilisationofpatientswithcholecystolithiasisinprimarycareamultipracticecomparativeanalysis
AT dragerluukdavid healthcareutilisationofpatientswithcholecystolithiasisinprimarycareamultipracticecomparativeanalysis
AT braakbreg healthcareutilisationofpatientswithcholecystolithiasisinprimarycareamultipracticecomparativeanalysis
AT drenthjoostph healthcareutilisationofpatientswithcholecystolithiasisinprimarycareamultipracticecomparativeanalysis
AT vanlaarhovencornelisjhm healthcareutilisationofpatientswithcholecystolithiasisinprimarycareamultipracticecomparativeanalysis
AT schershenkj healthcareutilisationofpatientswithcholecystolithiasisinprimarycareamultipracticecomparativeanalysis
AT dereuverphilipr healthcareutilisationofpatientswithcholecystolithiasisinprimarycareamultipracticecomparativeanalysis