Cargando…

Establishing best practices in cancer online support groups: protocol for a realist review

INTRODUCTION: Considerable observational evidence suggests that cancer online support groups reduce feelings of isolation, depression and anxiety, enhance coping and self-management, and lead to better informed patients. Other studies indicate that cancer online support groups can increase distress....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bender, Jacqueline L, Babinski, Stephanie, Wong, Geoff, Tricco, Andrea C, Englesakis, Marina, Cyr, Alaina B, Potts, Henry, Perski, Olga, Esplen, Mary Jane, Young, Colleen, Wassersug, Richard, Forster, Victoria, Papadakos, Janet, Soobiah, Charlene, Fox, Colleen, Gothard-Huang, Alison, Witteman, Holly
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8572404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34732498
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053916
_version_ 1784595208425439232
author Bender, Jacqueline L
Babinski, Stephanie
Wong, Geoff
Tricco, Andrea C
Englesakis, Marina
Cyr, Alaina B
Potts, Henry
Perski, Olga
Esplen, Mary Jane
Young, Colleen
Wassersug, Richard
Forster, Victoria
Papadakos, Janet
Soobiah, Charlene
Fox, Colleen
Gothard-Huang, Alison
Witteman, Holly
author_facet Bender, Jacqueline L
Babinski, Stephanie
Wong, Geoff
Tricco, Andrea C
Englesakis, Marina
Cyr, Alaina B
Potts, Henry
Perski, Olga
Esplen, Mary Jane
Young, Colleen
Wassersug, Richard
Forster, Victoria
Papadakos, Janet
Soobiah, Charlene
Fox, Colleen
Gothard-Huang, Alison
Witteman, Holly
author_sort Bender, Jacqueline L
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Considerable observational evidence suggests that cancer online support groups reduce feelings of isolation, depression and anxiety, enhance coping and self-management, and lead to better informed patients. Other studies indicate that cancer online support groups can increase distress. Yet no studies theorise the complex, context-dependent mechanisms by which cancer online support groups generate their—sometimes contrasting—outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Guided by an integrated knowledge translation approach and the strategy for patient-oriented research, we will conduct a realist review of cancer online support groups in partnership with stakeholders. We will follow Pawson’s five steps and existing quality standards to develop a program theory that explains how cancer online support groups work, for whom and in what circumstances. The specific research questions will be: what positive and negative outcomes have been reported on cancer online support groups? What are the mechanisms that are associated with these outcomes, in which contexts and for whom? Through a rigorous review of relevant scientific and grey literature, as well as ongoing dialogue with stakeholders, a program theory will be developed to explain who benefits from cancer online support groups and who does not, what benefits they derive (or do not), and the factors that affect these outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The use of secondary data for this review precludes the need for ethical approval. Dissemination will be informed by the knowledge-to-action framework and will consist of tailored knowledge products that are conceived of collaboratively with stakeholders. These will include peer-reviewed publications on how cancer online support groups can be optimised and best practice recommendations to maximise the benefits experienced by people with cancer. These traditional scientific outputs, along with their respective evidence summaries, will be amplified through strategic social media events hosted and promoted by knowledge users. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021250046.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8572404
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85724042021-11-17 Establishing best practices in cancer online support groups: protocol for a realist review Bender, Jacqueline L Babinski, Stephanie Wong, Geoff Tricco, Andrea C Englesakis, Marina Cyr, Alaina B Potts, Henry Perski, Olga Esplen, Mary Jane Young, Colleen Wassersug, Richard Forster, Victoria Papadakos, Janet Soobiah, Charlene Fox, Colleen Gothard-Huang, Alison Witteman, Holly BMJ Open Oncology INTRODUCTION: Considerable observational evidence suggests that cancer online support groups reduce feelings of isolation, depression and anxiety, enhance coping and self-management, and lead to better informed patients. Other studies indicate that cancer online support groups can increase distress. Yet no studies theorise the complex, context-dependent mechanisms by which cancer online support groups generate their—sometimes contrasting—outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Guided by an integrated knowledge translation approach and the strategy for patient-oriented research, we will conduct a realist review of cancer online support groups in partnership with stakeholders. We will follow Pawson’s five steps and existing quality standards to develop a program theory that explains how cancer online support groups work, for whom and in what circumstances. The specific research questions will be: what positive and negative outcomes have been reported on cancer online support groups? What are the mechanisms that are associated with these outcomes, in which contexts and for whom? Through a rigorous review of relevant scientific and grey literature, as well as ongoing dialogue with stakeholders, a program theory will be developed to explain who benefits from cancer online support groups and who does not, what benefits they derive (or do not), and the factors that affect these outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The use of secondary data for this review precludes the need for ethical approval. Dissemination will be informed by the knowledge-to-action framework and will consist of tailored knowledge products that are conceived of collaboratively with stakeholders. These will include peer-reviewed publications on how cancer online support groups can be optimised and best practice recommendations to maximise the benefits experienced by people with cancer. These traditional scientific outputs, along with their respective evidence summaries, will be amplified through strategic social media events hosted and promoted by knowledge users. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021250046. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8572404/ /pubmed/34732498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053916 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Oncology
Bender, Jacqueline L
Babinski, Stephanie
Wong, Geoff
Tricco, Andrea C
Englesakis, Marina
Cyr, Alaina B
Potts, Henry
Perski, Olga
Esplen, Mary Jane
Young, Colleen
Wassersug, Richard
Forster, Victoria
Papadakos, Janet
Soobiah, Charlene
Fox, Colleen
Gothard-Huang, Alison
Witteman, Holly
Establishing best practices in cancer online support groups: protocol for a realist review
title Establishing best practices in cancer online support groups: protocol for a realist review
title_full Establishing best practices in cancer online support groups: protocol for a realist review
title_fullStr Establishing best practices in cancer online support groups: protocol for a realist review
title_full_unstemmed Establishing best practices in cancer online support groups: protocol for a realist review
title_short Establishing best practices in cancer online support groups: protocol for a realist review
title_sort establishing best practices in cancer online support groups: protocol for a realist review
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8572404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34732498
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053916
work_keys_str_mv AT benderjacquelinel establishingbestpracticesincanceronlinesupportgroupsprotocolforarealistreview
AT babinskistephanie establishingbestpracticesincanceronlinesupportgroupsprotocolforarealistreview
AT wonggeoff establishingbestpracticesincanceronlinesupportgroupsprotocolforarealistreview
AT triccoandreac establishingbestpracticesincanceronlinesupportgroupsprotocolforarealistreview
AT englesakismarina establishingbestpracticesincanceronlinesupportgroupsprotocolforarealistreview
AT cyralainab establishingbestpracticesincanceronlinesupportgroupsprotocolforarealistreview
AT pottshenry establishingbestpracticesincanceronlinesupportgroupsprotocolforarealistreview
AT perskiolga establishingbestpracticesincanceronlinesupportgroupsprotocolforarealistreview
AT esplenmaryjane establishingbestpracticesincanceronlinesupportgroupsprotocolforarealistreview
AT youngcolleen establishingbestpracticesincanceronlinesupportgroupsprotocolforarealistreview
AT wassersugrichard establishingbestpracticesincanceronlinesupportgroupsprotocolforarealistreview
AT forstervictoria establishingbestpracticesincanceronlinesupportgroupsprotocolforarealistreview
AT papadakosjanet establishingbestpracticesincanceronlinesupportgroupsprotocolforarealistreview
AT soobiahcharlene establishingbestpracticesincanceronlinesupportgroupsprotocolforarealistreview
AT foxcolleen establishingbestpracticesincanceronlinesupportgroupsprotocolforarealistreview
AT gothardhuangalison establishingbestpracticesincanceronlinesupportgroupsprotocolforarealistreview
AT wittemanholly establishingbestpracticesincanceronlinesupportgroupsprotocolforarealistreview