Cargando…

Surgical safety checklist audits may be misleading! Improving the implementation and adherence of the surgical safety checklist: a quality improvement project

Despite good quality evidence for benefits with its use, challenges have been encountered in the correct and consistent implementation of the surgical safety checklist (SSC). Previous studies of the SSC have reported a discrepancy between what is documented and what is observed in real time. A basel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brown, Brigid, Bermingham, Sophia, Vermeulen, Marthinus, Jennings, Beth, Adamek, Kirsty, Markou, Mark, Bassham, Jane E, Hibbert, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8572456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34732540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001593
_version_ 1784595219111477248
author Brown, Brigid
Bermingham, Sophia
Vermeulen, Marthinus
Jennings, Beth
Adamek, Kirsty
Markou, Mark
Bassham, Jane E
Hibbert, Peter
author_facet Brown, Brigid
Bermingham, Sophia
Vermeulen, Marthinus
Jennings, Beth
Adamek, Kirsty
Markou, Mark
Bassham, Jane E
Hibbert, Peter
author_sort Brown, Brigid
collection PubMed
description Despite good quality evidence for benefits with its use, challenges have been encountered in the correct and consistent implementation of the surgical safety checklist (SSC). Previous studies of the SSC have reported a discrepancy between what is documented and what is observed in real time. A baseline observational audit at our institution demonstrated compliance of only 3.5% despite a documented compliance of 100%. This project used quality improvement principles of identifying the problem and designing strategies to improve staff compliance with the SSC. These included changing the SSC from paper-based to a reusable laminated form, a broad multidisciplinary education and marketing campaign, targeted coaching and modifying the implementation in response to ongoing staff feedback. Five direct observational audits were undertaken over four Plan–Do–Study–Act cycles to capture real-time information on staff compliance. Two staff surveys were also undertaken. Compliance with the SSC improved from 3.5% to 63% during this study. Staff reported they felt the new process improved patient safety and that the new SSC was easily incorporated into their workflow. Improving compliance with the SSC requires deep engagement with and cooperation of surgical, anaesthesia and nursing teams and understanding of their work practices and culture. The prospective observational audit highlighted an initial 3.5% compliance rate compared with 100% based on an audit of the patient notes. Relying solely on a retrospective paper-based model can lead to hospitals being unaware of significant safety and quality issues. While in-person prospective observations are more time-consuming and resource-consuming than retrospective audits, this study highlights their potential utility to gain a clear picture of actual events. The significant variation between documented and observed data may have considerable implications for other retrospective studies which rely on human-entered data for their results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8572456
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85724562021-11-17 Surgical safety checklist audits may be misleading! Improving the implementation and adherence of the surgical safety checklist: a quality improvement project Brown, Brigid Bermingham, Sophia Vermeulen, Marthinus Jennings, Beth Adamek, Kirsty Markou, Mark Bassham, Jane E Hibbert, Peter BMJ Open Qual Quality Improvement Report Despite good quality evidence for benefits with its use, challenges have been encountered in the correct and consistent implementation of the surgical safety checklist (SSC). Previous studies of the SSC have reported a discrepancy between what is documented and what is observed in real time. A baseline observational audit at our institution demonstrated compliance of only 3.5% despite a documented compliance of 100%. This project used quality improvement principles of identifying the problem and designing strategies to improve staff compliance with the SSC. These included changing the SSC from paper-based to a reusable laminated form, a broad multidisciplinary education and marketing campaign, targeted coaching and modifying the implementation in response to ongoing staff feedback. Five direct observational audits were undertaken over four Plan–Do–Study–Act cycles to capture real-time information on staff compliance. Two staff surveys were also undertaken. Compliance with the SSC improved from 3.5% to 63% during this study. Staff reported they felt the new process improved patient safety and that the new SSC was easily incorporated into their workflow. Improving compliance with the SSC requires deep engagement with and cooperation of surgical, anaesthesia and nursing teams and understanding of their work practices and culture. The prospective observational audit highlighted an initial 3.5% compliance rate compared with 100% based on an audit of the patient notes. Relying solely on a retrospective paper-based model can lead to hospitals being unaware of significant safety and quality issues. While in-person prospective observations are more time-consuming and resource-consuming than retrospective audits, this study highlights their potential utility to gain a clear picture of actual events. The significant variation between documented and observed data may have considerable implications for other retrospective studies which rely on human-entered data for their results. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8572456/ /pubmed/34732540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001593 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Quality Improvement Report
Brown, Brigid
Bermingham, Sophia
Vermeulen, Marthinus
Jennings, Beth
Adamek, Kirsty
Markou, Mark
Bassham, Jane E
Hibbert, Peter
Surgical safety checklist audits may be misleading! Improving the implementation and adherence of the surgical safety checklist: a quality improvement project
title Surgical safety checklist audits may be misleading! Improving the implementation and adherence of the surgical safety checklist: a quality improvement project
title_full Surgical safety checklist audits may be misleading! Improving the implementation and adherence of the surgical safety checklist: a quality improvement project
title_fullStr Surgical safety checklist audits may be misleading! Improving the implementation and adherence of the surgical safety checklist: a quality improvement project
title_full_unstemmed Surgical safety checklist audits may be misleading! Improving the implementation and adherence of the surgical safety checklist: a quality improvement project
title_short Surgical safety checklist audits may be misleading! Improving the implementation and adherence of the surgical safety checklist: a quality improvement project
title_sort surgical safety checklist audits may be misleading! improving the implementation and adherence of the surgical safety checklist: a quality improvement project
topic Quality Improvement Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8572456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34732540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001593
work_keys_str_mv AT brownbrigid surgicalsafetychecklistauditsmaybemisleadingimprovingtheimplementationandadherenceofthesurgicalsafetychecklistaqualityimprovementproject
AT berminghamsophia surgicalsafetychecklistauditsmaybemisleadingimprovingtheimplementationandadherenceofthesurgicalsafetychecklistaqualityimprovementproject
AT vermeulenmarthinus surgicalsafetychecklistauditsmaybemisleadingimprovingtheimplementationandadherenceofthesurgicalsafetychecklistaqualityimprovementproject
AT jenningsbeth surgicalsafetychecklistauditsmaybemisleadingimprovingtheimplementationandadherenceofthesurgicalsafetychecklistaqualityimprovementproject
AT adamekkirsty surgicalsafetychecklistauditsmaybemisleadingimprovingtheimplementationandadherenceofthesurgicalsafetychecklistaqualityimprovementproject
AT markoumark surgicalsafetychecklistauditsmaybemisleadingimprovingtheimplementationandadherenceofthesurgicalsafetychecklistaqualityimprovementproject
AT basshamjanee surgicalsafetychecklistauditsmaybemisleadingimprovingtheimplementationandadherenceofthesurgicalsafetychecklistaqualityimprovementproject
AT hibbertpeter surgicalsafetychecklistauditsmaybemisleadingimprovingtheimplementationandadherenceofthesurgicalsafetychecklistaqualityimprovementproject