Cargando…

Reversing physician hesitancy to recommend COVID-19 vaccination for pregnant patients

Physician hesitancy is said to occur when physicians do not recommend COVID-19 vaccination, and it is a contributing factor for the low vaccination rate for COVID-19 in pregnant women. Physician hesitancy has become a major, unaddressed problem with regard to the quality and safety of obstetrical ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chervenak, Frank A., McCullough, Laurence B., Grünebaum, Amos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8572733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34762864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2021.11.017
_version_ 1784595276204343296
author Chervenak, Frank A.
McCullough, Laurence B.
Grünebaum, Amos
author_facet Chervenak, Frank A.
McCullough, Laurence B.
Grünebaum, Amos
author_sort Chervenak, Frank A.
collection PubMed
description Physician hesitancy is said to occur when physicians do not recommend COVID-19 vaccination, and it is a contributing factor for the low vaccination rate for COVID-19 in pregnant women. Physician hesitancy has become a major, unaddressed problem with regard to the quality and safety of obstetrical care. We identify 3 root causes of physician hesitancy and describe how professional ethics in obstetrics should guide in reversing these root causes. They are clinical misapplications of key components of professionally responsible obstetrical practice: therapeutic nihilism, shared decision-making, and respect for patient autonomy. Therapeutic nihilism directs the obstetrician to avoid any clinical interventions during pregnancy to prevent teratogenic effects that might be unknown. Therapeutic nihilism is misapplied when there is a documented net clinical benefit with no evidence of clinical harm. Shared decision directs the obstetrician to only offer but not recommend clinical management. Shared decision-making plays a major role when there is uncertainty in clinical judgment but is misapplied when it becomes a universal model. It does not apply when there is a net clinical benefit. When there is a net clinical benefit, clinical management should be recommended, not simply offered. The ethical principle of respect for patient autonomy plays an indispensable role in decision-making with patients. It is misapplied when it is assumed that respect for autonomy requires physicians not to make recommendations and to defer to and implement patients’ decisions without exception. There is evidence that the obstetrician’s recommendations about the management of pregnancy are the most important factor in a pregnant woman’s decision-making. Simply deferring to the patient’s decisions makes for misapplied respect for patient autonomy. Obstetricians must end physician hesitancy about COVID-19 vaccination of pregnant women by reversing these 3 root causes of physician hesitancy. Reversing the root causes of physician hesitancy is an urgent matter of patient safety. The longer physician hesitancy continues and the longer the low vaccine acceptance rate of pregnant women lasts, preventable serious diseases, deaths of pregnant women, intensive care unit admissions, stillbirths, and other maternal and fetal complications of unvaccinated women will continue to occur. Physician hesitancy should not be permitted to influence the response to future pandemics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8572733
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85727332021-11-08 Reversing physician hesitancy to recommend COVID-19 vaccination for pregnant patients Chervenak, Frank A. McCullough, Laurence B. Grünebaum, Amos Am J Obstet Gynecol Clinical Opinion Physician hesitancy is said to occur when physicians do not recommend COVID-19 vaccination, and it is a contributing factor for the low vaccination rate for COVID-19 in pregnant women. Physician hesitancy has become a major, unaddressed problem with regard to the quality and safety of obstetrical care. We identify 3 root causes of physician hesitancy and describe how professional ethics in obstetrics should guide in reversing these root causes. They are clinical misapplications of key components of professionally responsible obstetrical practice: therapeutic nihilism, shared decision-making, and respect for patient autonomy. Therapeutic nihilism directs the obstetrician to avoid any clinical interventions during pregnancy to prevent teratogenic effects that might be unknown. Therapeutic nihilism is misapplied when there is a documented net clinical benefit with no evidence of clinical harm. Shared decision directs the obstetrician to only offer but not recommend clinical management. Shared decision-making plays a major role when there is uncertainty in clinical judgment but is misapplied when it becomes a universal model. It does not apply when there is a net clinical benefit. When there is a net clinical benefit, clinical management should be recommended, not simply offered. The ethical principle of respect for patient autonomy plays an indispensable role in decision-making with patients. It is misapplied when it is assumed that respect for autonomy requires physicians not to make recommendations and to defer to and implement patients’ decisions without exception. There is evidence that the obstetrician’s recommendations about the management of pregnancy are the most important factor in a pregnant woman’s decision-making. Simply deferring to the patient’s decisions makes for misapplied respect for patient autonomy. Obstetricians must end physician hesitancy about COVID-19 vaccination of pregnant women by reversing these 3 root causes of physician hesitancy. Reversing the root causes of physician hesitancy is an urgent matter of patient safety. The longer physician hesitancy continues and the longer the low vaccine acceptance rate of pregnant women lasts, preventable serious diseases, deaths of pregnant women, intensive care unit admissions, stillbirths, and other maternal and fetal complications of unvaccinated women will continue to occur. Physician hesitancy should not be permitted to influence the response to future pandemics. Elsevier Inc. 2022-06 2021-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8572733/ /pubmed/34762864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2021.11.017 Text en © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Clinical Opinion
Chervenak, Frank A.
McCullough, Laurence B.
Grünebaum, Amos
Reversing physician hesitancy to recommend COVID-19 vaccination for pregnant patients
title Reversing physician hesitancy to recommend COVID-19 vaccination for pregnant patients
title_full Reversing physician hesitancy to recommend COVID-19 vaccination for pregnant patients
title_fullStr Reversing physician hesitancy to recommend COVID-19 vaccination for pregnant patients
title_full_unstemmed Reversing physician hesitancy to recommend COVID-19 vaccination for pregnant patients
title_short Reversing physician hesitancy to recommend COVID-19 vaccination for pregnant patients
title_sort reversing physician hesitancy to recommend covid-19 vaccination for pregnant patients
topic Clinical Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8572733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34762864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2021.11.017
work_keys_str_mv AT chervenakfranka reversingphysicianhesitancytorecommendcovid19vaccinationforpregnantpatients
AT mcculloughlaurenceb reversingphysicianhesitancytorecommendcovid19vaccinationforpregnantpatients
AT grunebaumamos reversingphysicianhesitancytorecommendcovid19vaccinationforpregnantpatients