What would an ‘ideal’ glaucoma examination be like? - A conjoint analysis of patients’ and physicians’ preferences

PURPOSE: To structurally determine patients’ and physicians’ preferences for glaucoma diagnostic methods in order to improve glaucoma patient care and improve patient compliance with follow-up visits. METHODS: Forty-one patients with glaucoma and 32 ophthalmologists were included in this cross-sectional study. Profiles representing glaucoma examinations were created using conjoint analysis (CA). The following factors of a glaucoma examination method were evaluated: (1) examination comfort, (2) examination frequency, (3) follow-up examination necessary in case of suspicious result, (4) cost for the patient, (5) travel time to examination site, (6) sensitivity and (7) specificity of the examination method. RESULTS: Preferences were highest in both groups for examination sensitivity, followed by cost and specificity for the patient group. For the physician group, specificity was second most important, followed by cost. Least important was travel time for the patients and follow-up examinations for the physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Participants would rather pay more and travel longer to get a highly sensitive examination. This form of care is present in university eye hospitals. Consequently, it would be advisable to enhance capacities of these centers. Outpatient practices that offer glaucoma service should be fully equipped and should employ a glaucoma specialist. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10792-021-01960-5.