Cargando…
Center-Level Procedure Volume Does Not Predict Failure-to-Rescue After Severe Complications of Oncologic Colon and Rectal Surgery
BACKGROUND: The relationship between hospital surgical volume and outcome after colorectal cancer surgery has thoroughly been studied. However, few studies have assessed hospital surgical volume and failure-to-rescue (FTR) after colon and rectal cancer surgery. The aim of the current study is to eva...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8572842/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34448919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-021-06296-w |
_version_ | 1784595298779136000 |
---|---|
author | Lillo-Felipe, Miriam Ahl Hulme, Rebecka Forssten, Maximilian Peter Bass, Gary A. Cao, Yang Matthiessen, Peter Mohseni, Shahin |
author_facet | Lillo-Felipe, Miriam Ahl Hulme, Rebecka Forssten, Maximilian Peter Bass, Gary A. Cao, Yang Matthiessen, Peter Mohseni, Shahin |
author_sort | Lillo-Felipe, Miriam |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The relationship between hospital surgical volume and outcome after colorectal cancer surgery has thoroughly been studied. However, few studies have assessed hospital surgical volume and failure-to-rescue (FTR) after colon and rectal cancer surgery. The aim of the current study is to evaluate FTR following colorectal cancer surgery between clinics based on procedure volume. METHODS: Patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery in Sweden from January 2015 to January 2020 were recruited through the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. The primary endpoint was FTR, defined as the proportion of patients with 30-day mortality after severe postoperative complications in colorectal cancer surgery. Severe postoperative complications were defined as Clavien–Dindo ≥ 3. FTR incidence rate ratios (IRR) were calculated comparing center volume stratified in low-volume (≤ 200 cases/year) and high-volume centers (> 200 cases/year), as well as with an alternative stratification comparing low-volume (< 50 cases/year), medium-volume (50–150 cases/year) and high-volume centers (> 150 cases/year). RESULTS: A total of 23,351 patients were included in this study, of whom 2964 suffered severe postoperative complication(s). Adjusted IRR showed no significant differences between high- and low-volume centers with an IRR of 0.97 (0.75–1.26, p = 0.844) in high-volume centers in the first stratification and an IRR of 2.06 (0.80–5.31, p = 0.134) for high-volume centers and 2.15 (0.83–5.56, p = 0.116) for medium-volume centers in the second stratification. CONCLUSION: This nationwide retrospectively analyzed cohort study fails to demonstrate a significant association between hospital surgical volume and FTR after colorectal cancer surgery. Future studies should explore alternative characteristics and their correlation with FTR to identify possible interventions for the improvement of quality of care after colorectal cancer surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8572842 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85728422021-11-15 Center-Level Procedure Volume Does Not Predict Failure-to-Rescue After Severe Complications of Oncologic Colon and Rectal Surgery Lillo-Felipe, Miriam Ahl Hulme, Rebecka Forssten, Maximilian Peter Bass, Gary A. Cao, Yang Matthiessen, Peter Mohseni, Shahin World J Surg Original Scientific Report BACKGROUND: The relationship between hospital surgical volume and outcome after colorectal cancer surgery has thoroughly been studied. However, few studies have assessed hospital surgical volume and failure-to-rescue (FTR) after colon and rectal cancer surgery. The aim of the current study is to evaluate FTR following colorectal cancer surgery between clinics based on procedure volume. METHODS: Patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery in Sweden from January 2015 to January 2020 were recruited through the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. The primary endpoint was FTR, defined as the proportion of patients with 30-day mortality after severe postoperative complications in colorectal cancer surgery. Severe postoperative complications were defined as Clavien–Dindo ≥ 3. FTR incidence rate ratios (IRR) were calculated comparing center volume stratified in low-volume (≤ 200 cases/year) and high-volume centers (> 200 cases/year), as well as with an alternative stratification comparing low-volume (< 50 cases/year), medium-volume (50–150 cases/year) and high-volume centers (> 150 cases/year). RESULTS: A total of 23,351 patients were included in this study, of whom 2964 suffered severe postoperative complication(s). Adjusted IRR showed no significant differences between high- and low-volume centers with an IRR of 0.97 (0.75–1.26, p = 0.844) in high-volume centers in the first stratification and an IRR of 2.06 (0.80–5.31, p = 0.134) for high-volume centers and 2.15 (0.83–5.56, p = 0.116) for medium-volume centers in the second stratification. CONCLUSION: This nationwide retrospectively analyzed cohort study fails to demonstrate a significant association between hospital surgical volume and FTR after colorectal cancer surgery. Future studies should explore alternative characteristics and their correlation with FTR to identify possible interventions for the improvement of quality of care after colorectal cancer surgery. Springer International Publishing 2021-08-27 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8572842/ /pubmed/34448919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-021-06296-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Scientific Report Lillo-Felipe, Miriam Ahl Hulme, Rebecka Forssten, Maximilian Peter Bass, Gary A. Cao, Yang Matthiessen, Peter Mohseni, Shahin Center-Level Procedure Volume Does Not Predict Failure-to-Rescue After Severe Complications of Oncologic Colon and Rectal Surgery |
title | Center-Level Procedure Volume Does Not Predict Failure-to-Rescue After Severe Complications of Oncologic Colon and Rectal Surgery |
title_full | Center-Level Procedure Volume Does Not Predict Failure-to-Rescue After Severe Complications of Oncologic Colon and Rectal Surgery |
title_fullStr | Center-Level Procedure Volume Does Not Predict Failure-to-Rescue After Severe Complications of Oncologic Colon and Rectal Surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Center-Level Procedure Volume Does Not Predict Failure-to-Rescue After Severe Complications of Oncologic Colon and Rectal Surgery |
title_short | Center-Level Procedure Volume Does Not Predict Failure-to-Rescue After Severe Complications of Oncologic Colon and Rectal Surgery |
title_sort | center-level procedure volume does not predict failure-to-rescue after severe complications of oncologic colon and rectal surgery |
topic | Original Scientific Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8572842/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34448919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-021-06296-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lillofelipemiriam centerlevelprocedurevolumedoesnotpredictfailuretorescueafterseverecomplicationsofoncologiccolonandrectalsurgery AT ahlhulmerebecka centerlevelprocedurevolumedoesnotpredictfailuretorescueafterseverecomplicationsofoncologiccolonandrectalsurgery AT forsstenmaximilianpeter centerlevelprocedurevolumedoesnotpredictfailuretorescueafterseverecomplicationsofoncologiccolonandrectalsurgery AT bassgarya centerlevelprocedurevolumedoesnotpredictfailuretorescueafterseverecomplicationsofoncologiccolonandrectalsurgery AT caoyang centerlevelprocedurevolumedoesnotpredictfailuretorescueafterseverecomplicationsofoncologiccolonandrectalsurgery AT matthiessenpeter centerlevelprocedurevolumedoesnotpredictfailuretorescueafterseverecomplicationsofoncologiccolonandrectalsurgery AT mohsenishahin centerlevelprocedurevolumedoesnotpredictfailuretorescueafterseverecomplicationsofoncologiccolonandrectalsurgery |