Cargando…

Center-Level Procedure Volume Does Not Predict Failure-to-Rescue After Severe Complications of Oncologic Colon and Rectal Surgery

BACKGROUND: The relationship between hospital surgical volume and outcome after colorectal cancer surgery has thoroughly been studied. However, few studies have assessed hospital surgical volume and failure-to-rescue (FTR) after colon and rectal cancer surgery. The aim of the current study is to eva...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lillo-Felipe, Miriam, Ahl Hulme, Rebecka, Forssten, Maximilian Peter, Bass, Gary A., Cao, Yang, Matthiessen, Peter, Mohseni, Shahin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8572842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34448919
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-021-06296-w
_version_ 1784595298779136000
author Lillo-Felipe, Miriam
Ahl Hulme, Rebecka
Forssten, Maximilian Peter
Bass, Gary A.
Cao, Yang
Matthiessen, Peter
Mohseni, Shahin
author_facet Lillo-Felipe, Miriam
Ahl Hulme, Rebecka
Forssten, Maximilian Peter
Bass, Gary A.
Cao, Yang
Matthiessen, Peter
Mohseni, Shahin
author_sort Lillo-Felipe, Miriam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The relationship between hospital surgical volume and outcome after colorectal cancer surgery has thoroughly been studied. However, few studies have assessed hospital surgical volume and failure-to-rescue (FTR) after colon and rectal cancer surgery. The aim of the current study is to evaluate FTR following colorectal cancer surgery between clinics based on procedure volume. METHODS: Patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery in Sweden from January 2015 to January 2020 were recruited through the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. The primary endpoint was FTR, defined as the proportion of patients with 30-day mortality after severe postoperative complications in colorectal cancer surgery. Severe postoperative complications were defined as Clavien–Dindo ≥ 3. FTR incidence rate ratios (IRR) were calculated comparing center volume stratified in low-volume (≤ 200 cases/year) and high-volume centers (> 200 cases/year), as well as with an alternative stratification comparing low-volume (< 50 cases/year), medium-volume (50–150 cases/year) and high-volume centers (> 150 cases/year). RESULTS: A total of 23,351 patients were included in this study, of whom 2964 suffered severe postoperative complication(s). Adjusted IRR showed no significant differences between high- and low-volume centers with an IRR of 0.97 (0.75–1.26, p = 0.844) in high-volume centers in the first stratification and an IRR of 2.06 (0.80–5.31, p = 0.134) for high-volume centers and 2.15 (0.83–5.56, p = 0.116) for medium-volume centers in the second stratification. CONCLUSION: This nationwide retrospectively analyzed cohort study fails to demonstrate a significant association between hospital surgical volume and FTR after colorectal cancer surgery. Future studies should explore alternative characteristics and their correlation with FTR to identify possible interventions for the improvement of quality of care after colorectal cancer surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8572842
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85728422021-11-15 Center-Level Procedure Volume Does Not Predict Failure-to-Rescue After Severe Complications of Oncologic Colon and Rectal Surgery Lillo-Felipe, Miriam Ahl Hulme, Rebecka Forssten, Maximilian Peter Bass, Gary A. Cao, Yang Matthiessen, Peter Mohseni, Shahin World J Surg Original Scientific Report BACKGROUND: The relationship between hospital surgical volume and outcome after colorectal cancer surgery has thoroughly been studied. However, few studies have assessed hospital surgical volume and failure-to-rescue (FTR) after colon and rectal cancer surgery. The aim of the current study is to evaluate FTR following colorectal cancer surgery between clinics based on procedure volume. METHODS: Patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery in Sweden from January 2015 to January 2020 were recruited through the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. The primary endpoint was FTR, defined as the proportion of patients with 30-day mortality after severe postoperative complications in colorectal cancer surgery. Severe postoperative complications were defined as Clavien–Dindo ≥ 3. FTR incidence rate ratios (IRR) were calculated comparing center volume stratified in low-volume (≤ 200 cases/year) and high-volume centers (> 200 cases/year), as well as with an alternative stratification comparing low-volume (< 50 cases/year), medium-volume (50–150 cases/year) and high-volume centers (> 150 cases/year). RESULTS: A total of 23,351 patients were included in this study, of whom 2964 suffered severe postoperative complication(s). Adjusted IRR showed no significant differences between high- and low-volume centers with an IRR of 0.97 (0.75–1.26, p = 0.844) in high-volume centers in the first stratification and an IRR of 2.06 (0.80–5.31, p = 0.134) for high-volume centers and 2.15 (0.83–5.56, p = 0.116) for medium-volume centers in the second stratification. CONCLUSION: This nationwide retrospectively analyzed cohort study fails to demonstrate a significant association between hospital surgical volume and FTR after colorectal cancer surgery. Future studies should explore alternative characteristics and their correlation with FTR to identify possible interventions for the improvement of quality of care after colorectal cancer surgery. Springer International Publishing 2021-08-27 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8572842/ /pubmed/34448919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-021-06296-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Scientific Report
Lillo-Felipe, Miriam
Ahl Hulme, Rebecka
Forssten, Maximilian Peter
Bass, Gary A.
Cao, Yang
Matthiessen, Peter
Mohseni, Shahin
Center-Level Procedure Volume Does Not Predict Failure-to-Rescue After Severe Complications of Oncologic Colon and Rectal Surgery
title Center-Level Procedure Volume Does Not Predict Failure-to-Rescue After Severe Complications of Oncologic Colon and Rectal Surgery
title_full Center-Level Procedure Volume Does Not Predict Failure-to-Rescue After Severe Complications of Oncologic Colon and Rectal Surgery
title_fullStr Center-Level Procedure Volume Does Not Predict Failure-to-Rescue After Severe Complications of Oncologic Colon and Rectal Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Center-Level Procedure Volume Does Not Predict Failure-to-Rescue After Severe Complications of Oncologic Colon and Rectal Surgery
title_short Center-Level Procedure Volume Does Not Predict Failure-to-Rescue After Severe Complications of Oncologic Colon and Rectal Surgery
title_sort center-level procedure volume does not predict failure-to-rescue after severe complications of oncologic colon and rectal surgery
topic Original Scientific Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8572842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34448919
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-021-06296-w
work_keys_str_mv AT lillofelipemiriam centerlevelprocedurevolumedoesnotpredictfailuretorescueafterseverecomplicationsofoncologiccolonandrectalsurgery
AT ahlhulmerebecka centerlevelprocedurevolumedoesnotpredictfailuretorescueafterseverecomplicationsofoncologiccolonandrectalsurgery
AT forsstenmaximilianpeter centerlevelprocedurevolumedoesnotpredictfailuretorescueafterseverecomplicationsofoncologiccolonandrectalsurgery
AT bassgarya centerlevelprocedurevolumedoesnotpredictfailuretorescueafterseverecomplicationsofoncologiccolonandrectalsurgery
AT caoyang centerlevelprocedurevolumedoesnotpredictfailuretorescueafterseverecomplicationsofoncologiccolonandrectalsurgery
AT matthiessenpeter centerlevelprocedurevolumedoesnotpredictfailuretorescueafterseverecomplicationsofoncologiccolonandrectalsurgery
AT mohsenishahin centerlevelprocedurevolumedoesnotpredictfailuretorescueafterseverecomplicationsofoncologiccolonandrectalsurgery