Cargando…

Inhibitory Control was needed in Level-1 Visual Perspective Taking: A Developing Negative Priming Study

AIM: Previous studies have found that both children and adults have difficulties in dealing with judgments in which self-perspective differs from other-perspective, even in level-1 perspective-taking. However, the underlying cognitive mechanism of this is still unclear. In the present study, we desi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Xiaodong, Yuan, Meng, Xu, Ping, Wu, Wenyan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8572879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34764705
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S333824
_version_ 1784595306910842880
author Li, Xiaodong
Yuan, Meng
Xu, Ping
Wu, Wenyan
author_facet Li, Xiaodong
Yuan, Meng
Xu, Ping
Wu, Wenyan
author_sort Li, Xiaodong
collection PubMed
description AIM: Previous studies have found that both children and adults have difficulties in dealing with judgments in which self-perspective differs from other-perspective, even in level-1 perspective-taking. However, the underlying cognitive mechanism of this is still unclear. In the present study, we designed a negative priming (NP) paradigm of the dot-perspective task to examine whether inhibitory control was required to overcome egocentric bias in level-1 visual perspective-taking in children and adults. We observed an NP effect in both children (n= 43) and adults (n= 40). However, there was no significant difference between children and adults on the magnitude of the NP effect, indicating that when children could overcome the egocentric bias, they had inhibitory control ability comparable to that of adults in level-1 other-perspective-taking. BACKGROUND: Visual perspective-taking is an indispensable ability in social interaction; hence, it has attracted great attention from researchers. However, the mechanism underlying this process remains unclear. The present study aimed to investigate the role of inhibitory control in level-1 visual perspective-taking from a developmental perspective in order to understand the performance differences in perspective-taking tasks between children and adults. METHODS: The NP paradigm was applied to the dot-perspective task. Participants’ response times (RTs) and error rates (ERs) were recorded during the experiment. A 2 (trial type: test vs control, within-subject) × 2 (age: children vs adults) mix-design ANOVA was used to analyse the RTs and ERs data separately. RESULTS: We observed an NP effect for both children (7.31, t (42) = 2.78, p < 0.01, Cohen’s d = 0.22) and adults (27.58, t (39) = 2.31, p < 0.05, Cohen’s d = 0.21). However, the difference in the magnitude of the NP effect between children and adults was not significant (t (81) = 0.54, p = 0.59). CONCLUSION: Inhibitory control was needed to overcome egocentric bias in level-1 visual perspective-taking for both children and adults. Moreover, when children could overcome egocentric bias, they had an inhibitory control ability comparable to that of adults.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8572879
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85728792021-11-10 Inhibitory Control was needed in Level-1 Visual Perspective Taking: A Developing Negative Priming Study Li, Xiaodong Yuan, Meng Xu, Ping Wu, Wenyan Psychol Res Behav Manag Original Research AIM: Previous studies have found that both children and adults have difficulties in dealing with judgments in which self-perspective differs from other-perspective, even in level-1 perspective-taking. However, the underlying cognitive mechanism of this is still unclear. In the present study, we designed a negative priming (NP) paradigm of the dot-perspective task to examine whether inhibitory control was required to overcome egocentric bias in level-1 visual perspective-taking in children and adults. We observed an NP effect in both children (n= 43) and adults (n= 40). However, there was no significant difference between children and adults on the magnitude of the NP effect, indicating that when children could overcome the egocentric bias, they had inhibitory control ability comparable to that of adults in level-1 other-perspective-taking. BACKGROUND: Visual perspective-taking is an indispensable ability in social interaction; hence, it has attracted great attention from researchers. However, the mechanism underlying this process remains unclear. The present study aimed to investigate the role of inhibitory control in level-1 visual perspective-taking from a developmental perspective in order to understand the performance differences in perspective-taking tasks between children and adults. METHODS: The NP paradigm was applied to the dot-perspective task. Participants’ response times (RTs) and error rates (ERs) were recorded during the experiment. A 2 (trial type: test vs control, within-subject) × 2 (age: children vs adults) mix-design ANOVA was used to analyse the RTs and ERs data separately. RESULTS: We observed an NP effect for both children (7.31, t (42) = 2.78, p < 0.01, Cohen’s d = 0.22) and adults (27.58, t (39) = 2.31, p < 0.05, Cohen’s d = 0.21). However, the difference in the magnitude of the NP effect between children and adults was not significant (t (81) = 0.54, p = 0.59). CONCLUSION: Inhibitory control was needed to overcome egocentric bias in level-1 visual perspective-taking for both children and adults. Moreover, when children could overcome egocentric bias, they had an inhibitory control ability comparable to that of adults. Dove 2021-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8572879/ /pubmed/34764705 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S333824 Text en © 2021 Li et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Li, Xiaodong
Yuan, Meng
Xu, Ping
Wu, Wenyan
Inhibitory Control was needed in Level-1 Visual Perspective Taking: A Developing Negative Priming Study
title Inhibitory Control was needed in Level-1 Visual Perspective Taking: A Developing Negative Priming Study
title_full Inhibitory Control was needed in Level-1 Visual Perspective Taking: A Developing Negative Priming Study
title_fullStr Inhibitory Control was needed in Level-1 Visual Perspective Taking: A Developing Negative Priming Study
title_full_unstemmed Inhibitory Control was needed in Level-1 Visual Perspective Taking: A Developing Negative Priming Study
title_short Inhibitory Control was needed in Level-1 Visual Perspective Taking: A Developing Negative Priming Study
title_sort inhibitory control was needed in level-1 visual perspective taking: a developing negative priming study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8572879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34764705
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S333824
work_keys_str_mv AT lixiaodong inhibitorycontrolwasneededinlevel1visualperspectivetakingadevelopingnegativeprimingstudy
AT yuanmeng inhibitorycontrolwasneededinlevel1visualperspectivetakingadevelopingnegativeprimingstudy
AT xuping inhibitorycontrolwasneededinlevel1visualperspectivetakingadevelopingnegativeprimingstudy
AT wuwenyan inhibitorycontrolwasneededinlevel1visualperspectivetakingadevelopingnegativeprimingstudy