Cargando…

Cardiologic Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients Treated With Chest Radiotherapy: When and How?

Introduction: Radiotherapy may cause valvular (VHD), pericardial, coronary artery disease (CAD), left ventricular dysfunction (LVD), arrhythmias. The risk of radiation induced heart disease (RIHD) increases over time. The current guidelines suggest a screening for RIHD every 5 years in the long-term...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lestuzzi, Chiara, Mascarin, Maurizio, Coassin, Elisa, Canale, Maria Laura, Turazza, Fabio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8572927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34760934
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.671001
_version_ 1784595313534697472
author Lestuzzi, Chiara
Mascarin, Maurizio
Coassin, Elisa
Canale, Maria Laura
Turazza, Fabio
author_facet Lestuzzi, Chiara
Mascarin, Maurizio
Coassin, Elisa
Canale, Maria Laura
Turazza, Fabio
author_sort Lestuzzi, Chiara
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Radiotherapy may cause valvular (VHD), pericardial, coronary artery disease (CAD), left ventricular dysfunction (LVD), arrhythmias. The risk of radiation induced heart disease (RIHD) increases over time. The current guidelines suggest a screening for RIHD every 5 years in the long-term survivors who had been treated by chest RT. Methods: We reviewed the clinical and instrumental data of 106 patients diagnosed with RIHD. In one group (Group A: 69 patients) RIHD was diagnosed in an asymptomatic phase through a screening with ECG, echocardiogram and stress test. A second group (37 patients) was seen when RIHD was symptomatic. We compared the characteristics of the two groups at the time of RT, of RIHD detection and at last follow-up. Results: Overall, 64 patients (60%) had CAD (associated to other RIHD in 18); 39 (36.7%) had LVD (isolated in 20); 24 (22.6%) had VHD (isolated in 10 cases). The interval between the last negative test and the diagnosis of moderate or severe RIHD was <5 years in 26 patients, and <4 years in 18. In group A, 63% of the patients with CAD had silent ischemia. The two groups did not differ with regard to type of tumor, cardiovascular risk factors, use of anthracycline-based chemotherapy, age at RT treatment, radiation dose and interval between RT and toxicity detection. The mean time from RT and RIHD was 16 years in group A and 15 in group B. Interventional therapy at RIHD diagnosis was more frequent in group B (54 vs. 30%, p < 0.05). At last follow-up, 27 patients had died (12 of cancer, 9 of cardiac causes, 6 of other causes); mean ejection fraction was 60% in group A and 50% in group B (p < 0.01). Patients with ejection fraction ≤ 50% were 14.5% in group A and 40% in group B (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Clinically relevant RIHD become evident at a mean interval of 16 years after RT. The most frequent clinical manifestations are CAD and LVD. RIHD diagnosis in asymptomatic patients may preserve their cardiac function with timely interventions. We suggest -after 10 years from radiotherapy- a screening every 2–3 years.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8572927
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85729272021-11-09 Cardiologic Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients Treated With Chest Radiotherapy: When and How? Lestuzzi, Chiara Mascarin, Maurizio Coassin, Elisa Canale, Maria Laura Turazza, Fabio Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine Introduction: Radiotherapy may cause valvular (VHD), pericardial, coronary artery disease (CAD), left ventricular dysfunction (LVD), arrhythmias. The risk of radiation induced heart disease (RIHD) increases over time. The current guidelines suggest a screening for RIHD every 5 years in the long-term survivors who had been treated by chest RT. Methods: We reviewed the clinical and instrumental data of 106 patients diagnosed with RIHD. In one group (Group A: 69 patients) RIHD was diagnosed in an asymptomatic phase through a screening with ECG, echocardiogram and stress test. A second group (37 patients) was seen when RIHD was symptomatic. We compared the characteristics of the two groups at the time of RT, of RIHD detection and at last follow-up. Results: Overall, 64 patients (60%) had CAD (associated to other RIHD in 18); 39 (36.7%) had LVD (isolated in 20); 24 (22.6%) had VHD (isolated in 10 cases). The interval between the last negative test and the diagnosis of moderate or severe RIHD was <5 years in 26 patients, and <4 years in 18. In group A, 63% of the patients with CAD had silent ischemia. The two groups did not differ with regard to type of tumor, cardiovascular risk factors, use of anthracycline-based chemotherapy, age at RT treatment, radiation dose and interval between RT and toxicity detection. The mean time from RT and RIHD was 16 years in group A and 15 in group B. Interventional therapy at RIHD diagnosis was more frequent in group B (54 vs. 30%, p < 0.05). At last follow-up, 27 patients had died (12 of cancer, 9 of cardiac causes, 6 of other causes); mean ejection fraction was 60% in group A and 50% in group B (p < 0.01). Patients with ejection fraction ≤ 50% were 14.5% in group A and 40% in group B (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Clinically relevant RIHD become evident at a mean interval of 16 years after RT. The most frequent clinical manifestations are CAD and LVD. RIHD diagnosis in asymptomatic patients may preserve their cardiac function with timely interventions. We suggest -after 10 years from radiotherapy- a screening every 2–3 years. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8572927/ /pubmed/34760934 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.671001 Text en Copyright © 2021 Lestuzzi, Mascarin, Coassin, Canale and Turazza. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Lestuzzi, Chiara
Mascarin, Maurizio
Coassin, Elisa
Canale, Maria Laura
Turazza, Fabio
Cardiologic Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients Treated With Chest Radiotherapy: When and How?
title Cardiologic Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients Treated With Chest Radiotherapy: When and How?
title_full Cardiologic Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients Treated With Chest Radiotherapy: When and How?
title_fullStr Cardiologic Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients Treated With Chest Radiotherapy: When and How?
title_full_unstemmed Cardiologic Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients Treated With Chest Radiotherapy: When and How?
title_short Cardiologic Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients Treated With Chest Radiotherapy: When and How?
title_sort cardiologic long-term follow-up of patients treated with chest radiotherapy: when and how?
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8572927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34760934
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.671001
work_keys_str_mv AT lestuzzichiara cardiologiclongtermfollowupofpatientstreatedwithchestradiotherapywhenandhow
AT mascarinmaurizio cardiologiclongtermfollowupofpatientstreatedwithchestradiotherapywhenandhow
AT coassinelisa cardiologiclongtermfollowupofpatientstreatedwithchestradiotherapywhenandhow
AT canalemarialaura cardiologiclongtermfollowupofpatientstreatedwithchestradiotherapywhenandhow
AT turazzafabio cardiologiclongtermfollowupofpatientstreatedwithchestradiotherapywhenandhow