Cargando…
Methacholine challenges: comparison of different tidal breathing challenge methods
Tidal-breathing methacholine challenges are now recommended by guidelines, to avoid the bronchoprotective effects of deep inhalation. This study compared different tidal breathing methacholine challenge methods; assessed the agreement between tidal dosimetric and continuous output challenges; and as...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
European Respiratory Society
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8573237/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34761001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00282-2021 |
_version_ | 1784595379470204928 |
---|---|
author | Dean, James Jackson, Natalie Keidel-Morgan, Brett Hamer, Daniel Singh, Dave |
author_facet | Dean, James Jackson, Natalie Keidel-Morgan, Brett Hamer, Daniel Singh, Dave |
author_sort | Dean, James |
collection | PubMed |
description | Tidal-breathing methacholine challenges are now recommended by guidelines, to avoid the bronchoprotective effects of deep inhalation. This study compared different tidal breathing methacholine challenge methods; assessed the agreement between tidal dosimetric and continuous output challenges; and assessed challenge repeatability with different methods. 15 asthma patients performed dosimetric challenges and a continuous-output breath-actuated challenge, all ≥3 days apart. All subjects had a pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) ≥65% predicted, and a cumulative dose causing a 20% reduction in FEV(1) (PD(20)) <1.2 mg. Of the dosimetric challenges, one method increased methacholine concentration (standard dosimetric challenge), and one adjusted nebuliser output time to increase dose (adjusted dosimetric challenge). The adjusted dosimetric and continuous output challenges were performed twice on separate days to assess for repeatability. All challenges were matched for dose at each dose step. The mean PD(20) ratio of the standard dosimetric challenge to the adjusted dosimetric challenge was 0.90 (95% CI 0.66–1.23, p=0.49) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.82. Repeated adjusted dosimetric challenges had an ICC 0.62 for PD(20). Repeated continuous output challenges had an ICC 0.74 for PD(20). The adjusted dosimetric and continuous output challenges correlated (r=0.69, p=0.0043; ICC 0.65), but PD(20) was higher for the adjusted dosimetric challenge (mean PD(20) ratio 2.31, 95% CI 1.57–3.40; p=0.0004). Tidal dosimetric methacholine challenge using adjustment of nebuliser output produces results with good repeatability. The results of this adjusted dosimetric method differed from the continuous output method, underscoring that the results of different methacholine challenge methodologies may not be directly comparable. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8573237 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | European Respiratory Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85732372021-11-09 Methacholine challenges: comparison of different tidal breathing challenge methods Dean, James Jackson, Natalie Keidel-Morgan, Brett Hamer, Daniel Singh, Dave ERJ Open Res Original Research Articles Tidal-breathing methacholine challenges are now recommended by guidelines, to avoid the bronchoprotective effects of deep inhalation. This study compared different tidal breathing methacholine challenge methods; assessed the agreement between tidal dosimetric and continuous output challenges; and assessed challenge repeatability with different methods. 15 asthma patients performed dosimetric challenges and a continuous-output breath-actuated challenge, all ≥3 days apart. All subjects had a pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) ≥65% predicted, and a cumulative dose causing a 20% reduction in FEV(1) (PD(20)) <1.2 mg. Of the dosimetric challenges, one method increased methacholine concentration (standard dosimetric challenge), and one adjusted nebuliser output time to increase dose (adjusted dosimetric challenge). The adjusted dosimetric and continuous output challenges were performed twice on separate days to assess for repeatability. All challenges were matched for dose at each dose step. The mean PD(20) ratio of the standard dosimetric challenge to the adjusted dosimetric challenge was 0.90 (95% CI 0.66–1.23, p=0.49) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.82. Repeated adjusted dosimetric challenges had an ICC 0.62 for PD(20). Repeated continuous output challenges had an ICC 0.74 for PD(20). The adjusted dosimetric and continuous output challenges correlated (r=0.69, p=0.0043; ICC 0.65), but PD(20) was higher for the adjusted dosimetric challenge (mean PD(20) ratio 2.31, 95% CI 1.57–3.40; p=0.0004). Tidal dosimetric methacholine challenge using adjustment of nebuliser output produces results with good repeatability. The results of this adjusted dosimetric method differed from the continuous output method, underscoring that the results of different methacholine challenge methodologies may not be directly comparable. European Respiratory Society 2021-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8573237/ /pubmed/34761001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00282-2021 Text en Copyright ©The authors 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ersnet.org (mailto:permissions@ersnet.org) |
spellingShingle | Original Research Articles Dean, James Jackson, Natalie Keidel-Morgan, Brett Hamer, Daniel Singh, Dave Methacholine challenges: comparison of different tidal breathing challenge methods |
title | Methacholine challenges: comparison of different tidal breathing challenge methods |
title_full | Methacholine challenges: comparison of different tidal breathing challenge methods |
title_fullStr | Methacholine challenges: comparison of different tidal breathing challenge methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Methacholine challenges: comparison of different tidal breathing challenge methods |
title_short | Methacholine challenges: comparison of different tidal breathing challenge methods |
title_sort | methacholine challenges: comparison of different tidal breathing challenge methods |
topic | Original Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8573237/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34761001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00282-2021 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deanjames methacholinechallengescomparisonofdifferenttidalbreathingchallengemethods AT jacksonnatalie methacholinechallengescomparisonofdifferenttidalbreathingchallengemethods AT keidelmorganbrett methacholinechallengescomparisonofdifferenttidalbreathingchallengemethods AT hamerdaniel methacholinechallengescomparisonofdifferenttidalbreathingchallengemethods AT singhdave methacholinechallengescomparisonofdifferenttidalbreathingchallengemethods |