Cargando…
Comparison of domain adaptation techniques for white matter hyperintensity segmentation in brain MR images
Robust automated segmentation of white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) in different datasets (domains) is highly challenging due to differences in acquisition (scanner, sequence), population (WMH amount and location) and limited availability of manual segmentations to train supervised algorithms. In...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8573594/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34454295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2021.102215 |
_version_ | 1784595460142399488 |
---|---|
author | Sundaresan, Vaanathi Zamboni, Giovanna Dinsdale, Nicola K. Rothwell, Peter M. Griffanti, Ludovica Jenkinson, Mark |
author_facet | Sundaresan, Vaanathi Zamboni, Giovanna Dinsdale, Nicola K. Rothwell, Peter M. Griffanti, Ludovica Jenkinson, Mark |
author_sort | Sundaresan, Vaanathi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Robust automated segmentation of white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) in different datasets (domains) is highly challenging due to differences in acquisition (scanner, sequence), population (WMH amount and location) and limited availability of manual segmentations to train supervised algorithms. In this work we explore various domain adaptation techniques such as transfer learning and domain adversarial learning methods, including domain adversarial neural networks and domain unlearning, to improve the generalisability of our recently proposed triplanar ensemble network, which is our baseline model. We used datasets with variations in intensity profile, lesion characteristics and acquired using different scanners. For the source domain, we considered a dataset consisting of data acquired from 3 different scanners, while the target domain consisted of 2 datasets. We evaluated the domain adaptation techniques on the target domain datasets, and additionally evaluated the performance on the source domain test dataset for the adversarial techniques. For transfer learning, we also studied various training options such as minimal number of unfrozen layers and subjects required for fine-tuning in the target domain. On comparing the performance of different techniques on the target dataset, domain adversarial training of neural network gave the best performance, making the technique promising for robust WMH segmentation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8573594 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85735942021-12-01 Comparison of domain adaptation techniques for white matter hyperintensity segmentation in brain MR images Sundaresan, Vaanathi Zamboni, Giovanna Dinsdale, Nicola K. Rothwell, Peter M. Griffanti, Ludovica Jenkinson, Mark Med Image Anal Article Robust automated segmentation of white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) in different datasets (domains) is highly challenging due to differences in acquisition (scanner, sequence), population (WMH amount and location) and limited availability of manual segmentations to train supervised algorithms. In this work we explore various domain adaptation techniques such as transfer learning and domain adversarial learning methods, including domain adversarial neural networks and domain unlearning, to improve the generalisability of our recently proposed triplanar ensemble network, which is our baseline model. We used datasets with variations in intensity profile, lesion characteristics and acquired using different scanners. For the source domain, we considered a dataset consisting of data acquired from 3 different scanners, while the target domain consisted of 2 datasets. We evaluated the domain adaptation techniques on the target domain datasets, and additionally evaluated the performance on the source domain test dataset for the adversarial techniques. For transfer learning, we also studied various training options such as minimal number of unfrozen layers and subjects required for fine-tuning in the target domain. On comparing the performance of different techniques on the target dataset, domain adversarial training of neural network gave the best performance, making the technique promising for robust WMH segmentation. Elsevier 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8573594/ /pubmed/34454295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2021.102215 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Sundaresan, Vaanathi Zamboni, Giovanna Dinsdale, Nicola K. Rothwell, Peter M. Griffanti, Ludovica Jenkinson, Mark Comparison of domain adaptation techniques for white matter hyperintensity segmentation in brain MR images |
title | Comparison of domain adaptation techniques for white matter hyperintensity segmentation in brain MR images |
title_full | Comparison of domain adaptation techniques for white matter hyperintensity segmentation in brain MR images |
title_fullStr | Comparison of domain adaptation techniques for white matter hyperintensity segmentation in brain MR images |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of domain adaptation techniques for white matter hyperintensity segmentation in brain MR images |
title_short | Comparison of domain adaptation techniques for white matter hyperintensity segmentation in brain MR images |
title_sort | comparison of domain adaptation techniques for white matter hyperintensity segmentation in brain mr images |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8573594/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34454295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2021.102215 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sundaresanvaanathi comparisonofdomainadaptationtechniquesforwhitematterhyperintensitysegmentationinbrainmrimages AT zambonigiovanna comparisonofdomainadaptationtechniquesforwhitematterhyperintensitysegmentationinbrainmrimages AT dinsdalenicolak comparisonofdomainadaptationtechniquesforwhitematterhyperintensitysegmentationinbrainmrimages AT rothwellpeterm comparisonofdomainadaptationtechniquesforwhitematterhyperintensitysegmentationinbrainmrimages AT griffantiludovica comparisonofdomainadaptationtechniquesforwhitematterhyperintensitysegmentationinbrainmrimages AT jenkinsonmark comparisonofdomainadaptationtechniquesforwhitematterhyperintensitysegmentationinbrainmrimages |