Cargando…

Joint international consensus statement on crowdsourcing challenge contests in health and medicine: results of a modified Delphi process

OBJECTIVES: To develop a consensus statement to provide advice on designing, implementing and evaluating crowdsourcing challenge contests in public health and medical contexts. DESIGN: Modified Delphi using three rounds of survey questionnaires and one consensus workshop. SETTING: Uganda for face-to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, Larry, Tang, Weiming, Ritchwood, Tiarney, Day, Suzanne, Wei, Shufang, Bao, Huanyu, John, Randall, Kpokiri, Eneyi, Mathanga, Don, Awor, Phyllis, Juban, Noel, Castro-Arroyave, Diana, Ambil, Vibhu, Xiong, Yuan, Oppong, Emmanuela, Tucker, Joseph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8573649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34740928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048699
_version_ 1784595470144765952
author Han, Larry
Tang, Weiming
Ritchwood, Tiarney
Day, Suzanne
Wei, Shufang
Bao, Huanyu
John, Randall
Kpokiri, Eneyi
Mathanga, Don
Awor, Phyllis
Juban, Noel
Castro-Arroyave, Diana
Ambil, Vibhu
Xiong, Yuan
Oppong, Emmanuela
Tucker, Joseph
author_facet Han, Larry
Tang, Weiming
Ritchwood, Tiarney
Day, Suzanne
Wei, Shufang
Bao, Huanyu
John, Randall
Kpokiri, Eneyi
Mathanga, Don
Awor, Phyllis
Juban, Noel
Castro-Arroyave, Diana
Ambil, Vibhu
Xiong, Yuan
Oppong, Emmanuela
Tucker, Joseph
author_sort Han, Larry
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To develop a consensus statement to provide advice on designing, implementing and evaluating crowdsourcing challenge contests in public health and medical contexts. DESIGN: Modified Delphi using three rounds of survey questionnaires and one consensus workshop. SETTING: Uganda for face-to-face consensus activities, global for online survey questionnaires. PARTICIPANTS: A multidisciplinary expert panel was convened at a consensus-development conference in Uganda and included 21 researchers with experience leading challenge contests, five public health sector workers, and nine Ugandan end users. An online survey was sent to 140 corresponding authors of previously published articles that had used crowdsourcing methods. RESULTS: A subgroup of expert panel members developed the initial statement and survey. We received responses from 120 (85.7%) survey participants, which were presented at an in-person workshop of all 21 panel members. Panelists discussed each of the sections, revised the statement, and participated in a second round of the survey questionnaire. Based on this second survey round, we held detailed discussions of each subsection with workshop participants and further revised the consensus statement. We then conducted the third round of the questionnaire among the 21 expert panelists and used the results to finalize the statement. This iterative process resulted in 23 final statement items, all with greater than 80% consensus. Statement items are organised into the seven stages of a challenge contest, including the following: considering the appropriateness, organising a community steering committee, promoting the contest, assessing contributions, recognising contributors, sharing ideas and evaluating the contest (COPARSE). CONCLUSIONS: There is high agreement among crowdsourcing experts and stakeholders on the design and implementation of crowdsourcing challenge contests. The COPARSE consensus statement can be used to organise crowdsourcing challenge contests, improve the rigour and reproducibility of crowdsourcing research and enable large-scale collaboration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8573649
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85736492021-11-17 Joint international consensus statement on crowdsourcing challenge contests in health and medicine: results of a modified Delphi process Han, Larry Tang, Weiming Ritchwood, Tiarney Day, Suzanne Wei, Shufang Bao, Huanyu John, Randall Kpokiri, Eneyi Mathanga, Don Awor, Phyllis Juban, Noel Castro-Arroyave, Diana Ambil, Vibhu Xiong, Yuan Oppong, Emmanuela Tucker, Joseph BMJ Open Research Methods OBJECTIVES: To develop a consensus statement to provide advice on designing, implementing and evaluating crowdsourcing challenge contests in public health and medical contexts. DESIGN: Modified Delphi using three rounds of survey questionnaires and one consensus workshop. SETTING: Uganda for face-to-face consensus activities, global for online survey questionnaires. PARTICIPANTS: A multidisciplinary expert panel was convened at a consensus-development conference in Uganda and included 21 researchers with experience leading challenge contests, five public health sector workers, and nine Ugandan end users. An online survey was sent to 140 corresponding authors of previously published articles that had used crowdsourcing methods. RESULTS: A subgroup of expert panel members developed the initial statement and survey. We received responses from 120 (85.7%) survey participants, which were presented at an in-person workshop of all 21 panel members. Panelists discussed each of the sections, revised the statement, and participated in a second round of the survey questionnaire. Based on this second survey round, we held detailed discussions of each subsection with workshop participants and further revised the consensus statement. We then conducted the third round of the questionnaire among the 21 expert panelists and used the results to finalize the statement. This iterative process resulted in 23 final statement items, all with greater than 80% consensus. Statement items are organised into the seven stages of a challenge contest, including the following: considering the appropriateness, organising a community steering committee, promoting the contest, assessing contributions, recognising contributors, sharing ideas and evaluating the contest (COPARSE). CONCLUSIONS: There is high agreement among crowdsourcing experts and stakeholders on the design and implementation of crowdsourcing challenge contests. The COPARSE consensus statement can be used to organise crowdsourcing challenge contests, improve the rigour and reproducibility of crowdsourcing research and enable large-scale collaboration. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8573649/ /pubmed/34740928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048699 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Methods
Han, Larry
Tang, Weiming
Ritchwood, Tiarney
Day, Suzanne
Wei, Shufang
Bao, Huanyu
John, Randall
Kpokiri, Eneyi
Mathanga, Don
Awor, Phyllis
Juban, Noel
Castro-Arroyave, Diana
Ambil, Vibhu
Xiong, Yuan
Oppong, Emmanuela
Tucker, Joseph
Joint international consensus statement on crowdsourcing challenge contests in health and medicine: results of a modified Delphi process
title Joint international consensus statement on crowdsourcing challenge contests in health and medicine: results of a modified Delphi process
title_full Joint international consensus statement on crowdsourcing challenge contests in health and medicine: results of a modified Delphi process
title_fullStr Joint international consensus statement on crowdsourcing challenge contests in health and medicine: results of a modified Delphi process
title_full_unstemmed Joint international consensus statement on crowdsourcing challenge contests in health and medicine: results of a modified Delphi process
title_short Joint international consensus statement on crowdsourcing challenge contests in health and medicine: results of a modified Delphi process
title_sort joint international consensus statement on crowdsourcing challenge contests in health and medicine: results of a modified delphi process
topic Research Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8573649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34740928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048699
work_keys_str_mv AT hanlarry jointinternationalconsensusstatementoncrowdsourcingchallengecontestsinhealthandmedicineresultsofamodifieddelphiprocess
AT tangweiming jointinternationalconsensusstatementoncrowdsourcingchallengecontestsinhealthandmedicineresultsofamodifieddelphiprocess
AT ritchwoodtiarney jointinternationalconsensusstatementoncrowdsourcingchallengecontestsinhealthandmedicineresultsofamodifieddelphiprocess
AT daysuzanne jointinternationalconsensusstatementoncrowdsourcingchallengecontestsinhealthandmedicineresultsofamodifieddelphiprocess
AT weishufang jointinternationalconsensusstatementoncrowdsourcingchallengecontestsinhealthandmedicineresultsofamodifieddelphiprocess
AT baohuanyu jointinternationalconsensusstatementoncrowdsourcingchallengecontestsinhealthandmedicineresultsofamodifieddelphiprocess
AT johnrandall jointinternationalconsensusstatementoncrowdsourcingchallengecontestsinhealthandmedicineresultsofamodifieddelphiprocess
AT kpokirieneyi jointinternationalconsensusstatementoncrowdsourcingchallengecontestsinhealthandmedicineresultsofamodifieddelphiprocess
AT mathangadon jointinternationalconsensusstatementoncrowdsourcingchallengecontestsinhealthandmedicineresultsofamodifieddelphiprocess
AT aworphyllis jointinternationalconsensusstatementoncrowdsourcingchallengecontestsinhealthandmedicineresultsofamodifieddelphiprocess
AT jubannoel jointinternationalconsensusstatementoncrowdsourcingchallengecontestsinhealthandmedicineresultsofamodifieddelphiprocess
AT castroarroyavediana jointinternationalconsensusstatementoncrowdsourcingchallengecontestsinhealthandmedicineresultsofamodifieddelphiprocess
AT ambilvibhu jointinternationalconsensusstatementoncrowdsourcingchallengecontestsinhealthandmedicineresultsofamodifieddelphiprocess
AT xiongyuan jointinternationalconsensusstatementoncrowdsourcingchallengecontestsinhealthandmedicineresultsofamodifieddelphiprocess
AT oppongemmanuela jointinternationalconsensusstatementoncrowdsourcingchallengecontestsinhealthandmedicineresultsofamodifieddelphiprocess
AT tuckerjoseph jointinternationalconsensusstatementoncrowdsourcingchallengecontestsinhealthandmedicineresultsofamodifieddelphiprocess