Cargando…
Joint international consensus statement on crowdsourcing challenge contests in health and medicine: results of a modified Delphi process
OBJECTIVES: To develop a consensus statement to provide advice on designing, implementing and evaluating crowdsourcing challenge contests in public health and medical contexts. DESIGN: Modified Delphi using three rounds of survey questionnaires and one consensus workshop. SETTING: Uganda for face-to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8573649/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34740928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048699 |
_version_ | 1784595470144765952 |
---|---|
author | Han, Larry Tang, Weiming Ritchwood, Tiarney Day, Suzanne Wei, Shufang Bao, Huanyu John, Randall Kpokiri, Eneyi Mathanga, Don Awor, Phyllis Juban, Noel Castro-Arroyave, Diana Ambil, Vibhu Xiong, Yuan Oppong, Emmanuela Tucker, Joseph |
author_facet | Han, Larry Tang, Weiming Ritchwood, Tiarney Day, Suzanne Wei, Shufang Bao, Huanyu John, Randall Kpokiri, Eneyi Mathanga, Don Awor, Phyllis Juban, Noel Castro-Arroyave, Diana Ambil, Vibhu Xiong, Yuan Oppong, Emmanuela Tucker, Joseph |
author_sort | Han, Larry |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To develop a consensus statement to provide advice on designing, implementing and evaluating crowdsourcing challenge contests in public health and medical contexts. DESIGN: Modified Delphi using three rounds of survey questionnaires and one consensus workshop. SETTING: Uganda for face-to-face consensus activities, global for online survey questionnaires. PARTICIPANTS: A multidisciplinary expert panel was convened at a consensus-development conference in Uganda and included 21 researchers with experience leading challenge contests, five public health sector workers, and nine Ugandan end users. An online survey was sent to 140 corresponding authors of previously published articles that had used crowdsourcing methods. RESULTS: A subgroup of expert panel members developed the initial statement and survey. We received responses from 120 (85.7%) survey participants, which were presented at an in-person workshop of all 21 panel members. Panelists discussed each of the sections, revised the statement, and participated in a second round of the survey questionnaire. Based on this second survey round, we held detailed discussions of each subsection with workshop participants and further revised the consensus statement. We then conducted the third round of the questionnaire among the 21 expert panelists and used the results to finalize the statement. This iterative process resulted in 23 final statement items, all with greater than 80% consensus. Statement items are organised into the seven stages of a challenge contest, including the following: considering the appropriateness, organising a community steering committee, promoting the contest, assessing contributions, recognising contributors, sharing ideas and evaluating the contest (COPARSE). CONCLUSIONS: There is high agreement among crowdsourcing experts and stakeholders on the design and implementation of crowdsourcing challenge contests. The COPARSE consensus statement can be used to organise crowdsourcing challenge contests, improve the rigour and reproducibility of crowdsourcing research and enable large-scale collaboration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8573649 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85736492021-11-17 Joint international consensus statement on crowdsourcing challenge contests in health and medicine: results of a modified Delphi process Han, Larry Tang, Weiming Ritchwood, Tiarney Day, Suzanne Wei, Shufang Bao, Huanyu John, Randall Kpokiri, Eneyi Mathanga, Don Awor, Phyllis Juban, Noel Castro-Arroyave, Diana Ambil, Vibhu Xiong, Yuan Oppong, Emmanuela Tucker, Joseph BMJ Open Research Methods OBJECTIVES: To develop a consensus statement to provide advice on designing, implementing and evaluating crowdsourcing challenge contests in public health and medical contexts. DESIGN: Modified Delphi using three rounds of survey questionnaires and one consensus workshop. SETTING: Uganda for face-to-face consensus activities, global for online survey questionnaires. PARTICIPANTS: A multidisciplinary expert panel was convened at a consensus-development conference in Uganda and included 21 researchers with experience leading challenge contests, five public health sector workers, and nine Ugandan end users. An online survey was sent to 140 corresponding authors of previously published articles that had used crowdsourcing methods. RESULTS: A subgroup of expert panel members developed the initial statement and survey. We received responses from 120 (85.7%) survey participants, which were presented at an in-person workshop of all 21 panel members. Panelists discussed each of the sections, revised the statement, and participated in a second round of the survey questionnaire. Based on this second survey round, we held detailed discussions of each subsection with workshop participants and further revised the consensus statement. We then conducted the third round of the questionnaire among the 21 expert panelists and used the results to finalize the statement. This iterative process resulted in 23 final statement items, all with greater than 80% consensus. Statement items are organised into the seven stages of a challenge contest, including the following: considering the appropriateness, organising a community steering committee, promoting the contest, assessing contributions, recognising contributors, sharing ideas and evaluating the contest (COPARSE). CONCLUSIONS: There is high agreement among crowdsourcing experts and stakeholders on the design and implementation of crowdsourcing challenge contests. The COPARSE consensus statement can be used to organise crowdsourcing challenge contests, improve the rigour and reproducibility of crowdsourcing research and enable large-scale collaboration. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8573649/ /pubmed/34740928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048699 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Methods Han, Larry Tang, Weiming Ritchwood, Tiarney Day, Suzanne Wei, Shufang Bao, Huanyu John, Randall Kpokiri, Eneyi Mathanga, Don Awor, Phyllis Juban, Noel Castro-Arroyave, Diana Ambil, Vibhu Xiong, Yuan Oppong, Emmanuela Tucker, Joseph Joint international consensus statement on crowdsourcing challenge contests in health and medicine: results of a modified Delphi process |
title | Joint international consensus statement on crowdsourcing challenge contests in health and medicine: results of a modified Delphi process |
title_full | Joint international consensus statement on crowdsourcing challenge contests in health and medicine: results of a modified Delphi process |
title_fullStr | Joint international consensus statement on crowdsourcing challenge contests in health and medicine: results of a modified Delphi process |
title_full_unstemmed | Joint international consensus statement on crowdsourcing challenge contests in health and medicine: results of a modified Delphi process |
title_short | Joint international consensus statement on crowdsourcing challenge contests in health and medicine: results of a modified Delphi process |
title_sort | joint international consensus statement on crowdsourcing challenge contests in health and medicine: results of a modified delphi process |
topic | Research Methods |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8573649/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34740928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048699 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hanlarry jointinternationalconsensusstatementoncrowdsourcingchallengecontestsinhealthandmedicineresultsofamodifieddelphiprocess AT tangweiming jointinternationalconsensusstatementoncrowdsourcingchallengecontestsinhealthandmedicineresultsofamodifieddelphiprocess AT ritchwoodtiarney jointinternationalconsensusstatementoncrowdsourcingchallengecontestsinhealthandmedicineresultsofamodifieddelphiprocess AT daysuzanne jointinternationalconsensusstatementoncrowdsourcingchallengecontestsinhealthandmedicineresultsofamodifieddelphiprocess AT weishufang jointinternationalconsensusstatementoncrowdsourcingchallengecontestsinhealthandmedicineresultsofamodifieddelphiprocess AT baohuanyu jointinternationalconsensusstatementoncrowdsourcingchallengecontestsinhealthandmedicineresultsofamodifieddelphiprocess AT johnrandall jointinternationalconsensusstatementoncrowdsourcingchallengecontestsinhealthandmedicineresultsofamodifieddelphiprocess AT kpokirieneyi jointinternationalconsensusstatementoncrowdsourcingchallengecontestsinhealthandmedicineresultsofamodifieddelphiprocess AT mathangadon jointinternationalconsensusstatementoncrowdsourcingchallengecontestsinhealthandmedicineresultsofamodifieddelphiprocess AT aworphyllis jointinternationalconsensusstatementoncrowdsourcingchallengecontestsinhealthandmedicineresultsofamodifieddelphiprocess AT jubannoel jointinternationalconsensusstatementoncrowdsourcingchallengecontestsinhealthandmedicineresultsofamodifieddelphiprocess AT castroarroyavediana jointinternationalconsensusstatementoncrowdsourcingchallengecontestsinhealthandmedicineresultsofamodifieddelphiprocess AT ambilvibhu jointinternationalconsensusstatementoncrowdsourcingchallengecontestsinhealthandmedicineresultsofamodifieddelphiprocess AT xiongyuan jointinternationalconsensusstatementoncrowdsourcingchallengecontestsinhealthandmedicineresultsofamodifieddelphiprocess AT oppongemmanuela jointinternationalconsensusstatementoncrowdsourcingchallengecontestsinhealthandmedicineresultsofamodifieddelphiprocess AT tuckerjoseph jointinternationalconsensusstatementoncrowdsourcingchallengecontestsinhealthandmedicineresultsofamodifieddelphiprocess |