Cargando…

Development and evaluation of guidelines for prevention of retraumatisation in torture survivors during surgical care: protocol for a multistage qualitative study

INTRODUCTION: Healthcare professionals working in somatic departments are not trained to recognise signs of torture or provide appropriate healthcare to torture survivors, which may result in retraumatisation during surgical treatment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol outlines a four-stage qualit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schippert, Ana Carla, Grov, Ellen Karine, Dahl-Michelsen, Tone, Silvola, Juha, Sparboe-Nilsen, Bente, Danielsen, Stein Ove, Aaland, Mariann, Bjørnnes, Ann Kristin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8573660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34740935
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053670
_version_ 1784595472876306432
author Schippert, Ana Carla
Grov, Ellen Karine
Dahl-Michelsen, Tone
Silvola, Juha
Sparboe-Nilsen, Bente
Danielsen, Stein Ove
Aaland, Mariann
Bjørnnes, Ann Kristin
author_facet Schippert, Ana Carla
Grov, Ellen Karine
Dahl-Michelsen, Tone
Silvola, Juha
Sparboe-Nilsen, Bente
Danielsen, Stein Ove
Aaland, Mariann
Bjørnnes, Ann Kristin
author_sort Schippert, Ana Carla
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Healthcare professionals working in somatic departments are not trained to recognise signs of torture or provide appropriate healthcare to torture survivors, which may result in retraumatisation during surgical treatment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol outlines a four-stage qualitative-method strategy for the development and evaluation of guidelines for prevention of retraumatisation of torture survivors during surgical care. The systematic search for literature review in stages 1 and 2 was conducted in August 2019 and March 2021, respectively, using nine databases. The search strategies employed in stage 1, without imposing any date limits, resulted in the inclusion of eight studies that addressed inadequate healthcare strategies associated with retraumatisation. The clinical guidelines review in stage 2 will include publications from 2000 onwards, which will be appraised using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation Version II instrument. Following multi-institutional recruitment in Norway, stage 3 will explore survivors’ experiences of receiving surgical treatment using indepth interviews (n=8–12), which will be audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using the interpretative phenomenological analysis approach. In stage 4a, based on the findings from stages 1, 2 and 3, a set of clinical guidelines for preventing retraumatisation during surgical treatment will be developed. Next, the feasibility and acceptability of the guidelines will be assessed in stage 4b in three interdisciplinary focus group interviews (n=5 per group) and text condensation analyses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Regional (South-East C) Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics approved the study in May 2021 (#227624). In stages 3 and 4, an informational letter and an informed consent form will be distributed to the participants to sign before the interview. The study results will be disseminated through publications, conference presentations, and national and local public forums to healthcare professionals, service managers, policymakers and refugee-supporting agencies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8573660
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85736602021-11-17 Development and evaluation of guidelines for prevention of retraumatisation in torture survivors during surgical care: protocol for a multistage qualitative study Schippert, Ana Carla Grov, Ellen Karine Dahl-Michelsen, Tone Silvola, Juha Sparboe-Nilsen, Bente Danielsen, Stein Ove Aaland, Mariann Bjørnnes, Ann Kristin BMJ Open Qualitative Research INTRODUCTION: Healthcare professionals working in somatic departments are not trained to recognise signs of torture or provide appropriate healthcare to torture survivors, which may result in retraumatisation during surgical treatment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol outlines a four-stage qualitative-method strategy for the development and evaluation of guidelines for prevention of retraumatisation of torture survivors during surgical care. The systematic search for literature review in stages 1 and 2 was conducted in August 2019 and March 2021, respectively, using nine databases. The search strategies employed in stage 1, without imposing any date limits, resulted in the inclusion of eight studies that addressed inadequate healthcare strategies associated with retraumatisation. The clinical guidelines review in stage 2 will include publications from 2000 onwards, which will be appraised using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation Version II instrument. Following multi-institutional recruitment in Norway, stage 3 will explore survivors’ experiences of receiving surgical treatment using indepth interviews (n=8–12), which will be audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using the interpretative phenomenological analysis approach. In stage 4a, based on the findings from stages 1, 2 and 3, a set of clinical guidelines for preventing retraumatisation during surgical treatment will be developed. Next, the feasibility and acceptability of the guidelines will be assessed in stage 4b in three interdisciplinary focus group interviews (n=5 per group) and text condensation analyses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Regional (South-East C) Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics approved the study in May 2021 (#227624). In stages 3 and 4, an informational letter and an informed consent form will be distributed to the participants to sign before the interview. The study results will be disseminated through publications, conference presentations, and national and local public forums to healthcare professionals, service managers, policymakers and refugee-supporting agencies. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8573660/ /pubmed/34740935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053670 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Qualitative Research
Schippert, Ana Carla
Grov, Ellen Karine
Dahl-Michelsen, Tone
Silvola, Juha
Sparboe-Nilsen, Bente
Danielsen, Stein Ove
Aaland, Mariann
Bjørnnes, Ann Kristin
Development and evaluation of guidelines for prevention of retraumatisation in torture survivors during surgical care: protocol for a multistage qualitative study
title Development and evaluation of guidelines for prevention of retraumatisation in torture survivors during surgical care: protocol for a multistage qualitative study
title_full Development and evaluation of guidelines for prevention of retraumatisation in torture survivors during surgical care: protocol for a multistage qualitative study
title_fullStr Development and evaluation of guidelines for prevention of retraumatisation in torture survivors during surgical care: protocol for a multistage qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Development and evaluation of guidelines for prevention of retraumatisation in torture survivors during surgical care: protocol for a multistage qualitative study
title_short Development and evaluation of guidelines for prevention of retraumatisation in torture survivors during surgical care: protocol for a multistage qualitative study
title_sort development and evaluation of guidelines for prevention of retraumatisation in torture survivors during surgical care: protocol for a multistage qualitative study
topic Qualitative Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8573660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34740935
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053670
work_keys_str_mv AT schippertanacarla developmentandevaluationofguidelinesforpreventionofretraumatisationintorturesurvivorsduringsurgicalcareprotocolforamultistagequalitativestudy
AT grovellenkarine developmentandevaluationofguidelinesforpreventionofretraumatisationintorturesurvivorsduringsurgicalcareprotocolforamultistagequalitativestudy
AT dahlmichelsentone developmentandevaluationofguidelinesforpreventionofretraumatisationintorturesurvivorsduringsurgicalcareprotocolforamultistagequalitativestudy
AT silvolajuha developmentandevaluationofguidelinesforpreventionofretraumatisationintorturesurvivorsduringsurgicalcareprotocolforamultistagequalitativestudy
AT sparboenilsenbente developmentandevaluationofguidelinesforpreventionofretraumatisationintorturesurvivorsduringsurgicalcareprotocolforamultistagequalitativestudy
AT danielsensteinove developmentandevaluationofguidelinesforpreventionofretraumatisationintorturesurvivorsduringsurgicalcareprotocolforamultistagequalitativestudy
AT aalandmariann developmentandevaluationofguidelinesforpreventionofretraumatisationintorturesurvivorsduringsurgicalcareprotocolforamultistagequalitativestudy
AT bjørnnesannkristin developmentandevaluationofguidelinesforpreventionofretraumatisationintorturesurvivorsduringsurgicalcareprotocolforamultistagequalitativestudy