Cargando…

Neurological outcomes after traumatic cardiopulmonary arrest: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Despite appropriate care, most patients do not survive traumatic cardiac arrest, and many survivors suffer from permanent neurological disability. The prevalence of non-dismal neurological outcomes remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the current review is to summarize and assess the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shi, Daniel, McLaren, Christie, Evans, Chris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8573669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34796272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2021-000817
_version_ 1784595474760597504
author Shi, Daniel
McLaren, Christie
Evans, Chris
author_facet Shi, Daniel
McLaren, Christie
Evans, Chris
author_sort Shi, Daniel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite appropriate care, most patients do not survive traumatic cardiac arrest, and many survivors suffer from permanent neurological disability. The prevalence of non-dismal neurological outcomes remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the current review is to summarize and assess the quality of reporting of the neurological outcomes in traumatic cardiac arrest survivors. DATA SOURCES: A systematic review of Embase, Medline, PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and ProQuest databases was performed from inception of the database to July 2020. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Observational cohort studies that reported neurological outcomes of patients surviving traumatic cardiac arrest were included. PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Patients who were resuscitated following traumatic cardiac arrest. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: The quality of the included studies was assessed using ROBINS-I (Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies - of Interventions) for observational studies. RESULTS: From 4295 retrieved studies, 40 were included (n=23 644 patients). The survival rate was 9.2% (n=2168 patients). Neurological status was primarily assessed at discharge. Overall, 45.8% of the survivors had good or moderate neurological recovery, 29.0% had severe neurological disability or suffered a vegetative state, and 25.2% had missing neurological outcomes. Seventeen studies qualitatively described neurological outcomes based on patient disposition and 23 studies used standardized outcome scales. 28 studies had a serious risk of bias and 12 had moderate risk of bias. LIMITATIONS: The existing literature is characterized by inadequate outcome reporting and a high risk of bias, which limit our ability to prognosticate in this patient population. CONCLUSIONS OR IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS: Good and moderate neurological recoveries are frequently reported in patients who survive traumatic cardiac arrest. Prospective studies focused on quality of survivorship in traumatic arrest are urgently needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic review, level IV. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020198482.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8573669
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85736692021-11-17 Neurological outcomes after traumatic cardiopulmonary arrest: a systematic review Shi, Daniel McLaren, Christie Evans, Chris Trauma Surg Acute Care Open Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Despite appropriate care, most patients do not survive traumatic cardiac arrest, and many survivors suffer from permanent neurological disability. The prevalence of non-dismal neurological outcomes remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the current review is to summarize and assess the quality of reporting of the neurological outcomes in traumatic cardiac arrest survivors. DATA SOURCES: A systematic review of Embase, Medline, PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and ProQuest databases was performed from inception of the database to July 2020. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Observational cohort studies that reported neurological outcomes of patients surviving traumatic cardiac arrest were included. PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Patients who were resuscitated following traumatic cardiac arrest. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: The quality of the included studies was assessed using ROBINS-I (Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies - of Interventions) for observational studies. RESULTS: From 4295 retrieved studies, 40 were included (n=23 644 patients). The survival rate was 9.2% (n=2168 patients). Neurological status was primarily assessed at discharge. Overall, 45.8% of the survivors had good or moderate neurological recovery, 29.0% had severe neurological disability or suffered a vegetative state, and 25.2% had missing neurological outcomes. Seventeen studies qualitatively described neurological outcomes based on patient disposition and 23 studies used standardized outcome scales. 28 studies had a serious risk of bias and 12 had moderate risk of bias. LIMITATIONS: The existing literature is characterized by inadequate outcome reporting and a high risk of bias, which limit our ability to prognosticate in this patient population. CONCLUSIONS OR IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS: Good and moderate neurological recoveries are frequently reported in patients who survive traumatic cardiac arrest. Prospective studies focused on quality of survivorship in traumatic arrest are urgently needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic review, level IV. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020198482. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8573669/ /pubmed/34796272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2021-000817 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Shi, Daniel
McLaren, Christie
Evans, Chris
Neurological outcomes after traumatic cardiopulmonary arrest: a systematic review
title Neurological outcomes after traumatic cardiopulmonary arrest: a systematic review
title_full Neurological outcomes after traumatic cardiopulmonary arrest: a systematic review
title_fullStr Neurological outcomes after traumatic cardiopulmonary arrest: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Neurological outcomes after traumatic cardiopulmonary arrest: a systematic review
title_short Neurological outcomes after traumatic cardiopulmonary arrest: a systematic review
title_sort neurological outcomes after traumatic cardiopulmonary arrest: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8573669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34796272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2021-000817
work_keys_str_mv AT shidaniel neurologicaloutcomesaftertraumaticcardiopulmonaryarrestasystematicreview
AT mclarenchristie neurologicaloutcomesaftertraumaticcardiopulmonaryarrestasystematicreview
AT evanschris neurologicaloutcomesaftertraumaticcardiopulmonaryarrestasystematicreview