Cargando…

Safety and feasibility study of using polyphosphate (PolyP) in alveolar cleft repair: a pilot study

BACKGROUND: Bone grafting is an important surgical procedure to reconstruct alveolar bone defects in patients with cleft lip and palate. Polyphosphate (PolyP) is a physiological polymer present in the blood, primarily in platelets. PolyP plays a role as a phosphate source in bone calcium phosphate d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alkaabi, Salem A., Kalla, Diandra Sabrina Natsir, Alsabri, Ghamdan A., Fauzi, Abul, Jansen, Nova, Tajrin, Andi, Nurrahma, Rifaat, Müller, Werner, Schröder, Heinz C., Xiaohong, Wang, Forouzanfar, Tymour, Helder, Marco N., Ruslin, Muhammad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8573762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34749808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00939-4
_version_ 1784595489302249472
author Alkaabi, Salem A.
Kalla, Diandra Sabrina Natsir
Alsabri, Ghamdan A.
Fauzi, Abul
Jansen, Nova
Tajrin, Andi
Nurrahma, Rifaat
Müller, Werner
Schröder, Heinz C.
Xiaohong, Wang
Forouzanfar, Tymour
Helder, Marco N.
Ruslin, Muhammad
author_facet Alkaabi, Salem A.
Kalla, Diandra Sabrina Natsir
Alsabri, Ghamdan A.
Fauzi, Abul
Jansen, Nova
Tajrin, Andi
Nurrahma, Rifaat
Müller, Werner
Schröder, Heinz C.
Xiaohong, Wang
Forouzanfar, Tymour
Helder, Marco N.
Ruslin, Muhammad
author_sort Alkaabi, Salem A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bone grafting is an important surgical procedure to reconstruct alveolar bone defects in patients with cleft lip and palate. Polyphosphate (PolyP) is a physiological polymer present in the blood, primarily in platelets. PolyP plays a role as a phosphate source in bone calcium phosphate deposition. Moreover, the cleavage of high-energy bonds to release phosphates provides local energy necessary for regenerative processes. In this study, polyP is complexed with calcium to form Calcium polyP microparticles (Ca-polyP MPs), which were shown to have osteoinductive properties in preclinical studies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and osteoinductivity of Ca-polyP MPs, alone or in combination with BCP, in a first-in-human clinical trial. METHODS: This single-blinded, parallel, prospective clinical pilot study enrolled eight adolescent patients (mean age 18.1: range 13–34 years) with residual alveolar bone cleft. Randomization in two groups (four receiving Ca-polyP MPs only, four a combination of Ca-polyP MPs and biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP)) was performed. Patient follow-up was 6 months. Outcome parameters included safety parameters and close monitoring of possible adverse effects using radiographic imaging, regular blood tests, and physical examinations. Osteoinductivity evaluation using histomorphometric analysis of biopsies was not possible due to COVID restrictions. RESULTS: Due to surgical and feasibility reasons, eventually, only 2 patients received Ca-polyP MPs, and the others the combination graft. All patients were assessed up to day 90. Four out of eight were able to continue with the final assessment day (day 180). Three out of eight were unable to reach the hospital due to COVID-19 restrictions. One patient decided not to continue with the study. None of the patients showed any allergic reactions or any remarkable local or systematic side effects. Radiographically, patients receiving Ca-polyP MPs only were scored grade IV Bergland scale, while patients who got the BCP/Ca-polyP MPs combination had scores ranging from I to III. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that Ca-polyP MPs and the BCP/Ca-polyP MPs combination appear to be safe graft materials; however, in the current setting, Ca-polyP MPs alone may not be a sufficiently stable defect-filling scaffold to be used in alveolar cleft repair. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Indonesian Trial Registry under number INA-EW74C1N by the ethical committee of Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia with code number 1063/UN4.6.4.5.31/PP36/2019.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8573762
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85737622021-11-08 Safety and feasibility study of using polyphosphate (PolyP) in alveolar cleft repair: a pilot study Alkaabi, Salem A. Kalla, Diandra Sabrina Natsir Alsabri, Ghamdan A. Fauzi, Abul Jansen, Nova Tajrin, Andi Nurrahma, Rifaat Müller, Werner Schröder, Heinz C. Xiaohong, Wang Forouzanfar, Tymour Helder, Marco N. Ruslin, Muhammad Pilot Feasibility Stud Research BACKGROUND: Bone grafting is an important surgical procedure to reconstruct alveolar bone defects in patients with cleft lip and palate. Polyphosphate (PolyP) is a physiological polymer present in the blood, primarily in platelets. PolyP plays a role as a phosphate source in bone calcium phosphate deposition. Moreover, the cleavage of high-energy bonds to release phosphates provides local energy necessary for regenerative processes. In this study, polyP is complexed with calcium to form Calcium polyP microparticles (Ca-polyP MPs), which were shown to have osteoinductive properties in preclinical studies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and osteoinductivity of Ca-polyP MPs, alone or in combination with BCP, in a first-in-human clinical trial. METHODS: This single-blinded, parallel, prospective clinical pilot study enrolled eight adolescent patients (mean age 18.1: range 13–34 years) with residual alveolar bone cleft. Randomization in two groups (four receiving Ca-polyP MPs only, four a combination of Ca-polyP MPs and biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP)) was performed. Patient follow-up was 6 months. Outcome parameters included safety parameters and close monitoring of possible adverse effects using radiographic imaging, regular blood tests, and physical examinations. Osteoinductivity evaluation using histomorphometric analysis of biopsies was not possible due to COVID restrictions. RESULTS: Due to surgical and feasibility reasons, eventually, only 2 patients received Ca-polyP MPs, and the others the combination graft. All patients were assessed up to day 90. Four out of eight were able to continue with the final assessment day (day 180). Three out of eight were unable to reach the hospital due to COVID-19 restrictions. One patient decided not to continue with the study. None of the patients showed any allergic reactions or any remarkable local or systematic side effects. Radiographically, patients receiving Ca-polyP MPs only were scored grade IV Bergland scale, while patients who got the BCP/Ca-polyP MPs combination had scores ranging from I to III. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that Ca-polyP MPs and the BCP/Ca-polyP MPs combination appear to be safe graft materials; however, in the current setting, Ca-polyP MPs alone may not be a sufficiently stable defect-filling scaffold to be used in alveolar cleft repair. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Indonesian Trial Registry under number INA-EW74C1N by the ethical committee of Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia with code number 1063/UN4.6.4.5.31/PP36/2019. BioMed Central 2021-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8573762/ /pubmed/34749808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00939-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Alkaabi, Salem A.
Kalla, Diandra Sabrina Natsir
Alsabri, Ghamdan A.
Fauzi, Abul
Jansen, Nova
Tajrin, Andi
Nurrahma, Rifaat
Müller, Werner
Schröder, Heinz C.
Xiaohong, Wang
Forouzanfar, Tymour
Helder, Marco N.
Ruslin, Muhammad
Safety and feasibility study of using polyphosphate (PolyP) in alveolar cleft repair: a pilot study
title Safety and feasibility study of using polyphosphate (PolyP) in alveolar cleft repair: a pilot study
title_full Safety and feasibility study of using polyphosphate (PolyP) in alveolar cleft repair: a pilot study
title_fullStr Safety and feasibility study of using polyphosphate (PolyP) in alveolar cleft repair: a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Safety and feasibility study of using polyphosphate (PolyP) in alveolar cleft repair: a pilot study
title_short Safety and feasibility study of using polyphosphate (PolyP) in alveolar cleft repair: a pilot study
title_sort safety and feasibility study of using polyphosphate (polyp) in alveolar cleft repair: a pilot study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8573762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34749808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00939-4
work_keys_str_mv AT alkaabisalema safetyandfeasibilitystudyofusingpolyphosphatepolypinalveolarcleftrepairapilotstudy
AT kalladiandrasabrinanatsir safetyandfeasibilitystudyofusingpolyphosphatepolypinalveolarcleftrepairapilotstudy
AT alsabrighamdana safetyandfeasibilitystudyofusingpolyphosphatepolypinalveolarcleftrepairapilotstudy
AT fauziabul safetyandfeasibilitystudyofusingpolyphosphatepolypinalveolarcleftrepairapilotstudy
AT jansennova safetyandfeasibilitystudyofusingpolyphosphatepolypinalveolarcleftrepairapilotstudy
AT tajrinandi safetyandfeasibilitystudyofusingpolyphosphatepolypinalveolarcleftrepairapilotstudy
AT nurrahmarifaat safetyandfeasibilitystudyofusingpolyphosphatepolypinalveolarcleftrepairapilotstudy
AT mullerwerner safetyandfeasibilitystudyofusingpolyphosphatepolypinalveolarcleftrepairapilotstudy
AT schroderheinzc safetyandfeasibilitystudyofusingpolyphosphatepolypinalveolarcleftrepairapilotstudy
AT xiaohongwang safetyandfeasibilitystudyofusingpolyphosphatepolypinalveolarcleftrepairapilotstudy
AT forouzanfartymour safetyandfeasibilitystudyofusingpolyphosphatepolypinalveolarcleftrepairapilotstudy
AT heldermarcon safetyandfeasibilitystudyofusingpolyphosphatepolypinalveolarcleftrepairapilotstudy
AT ruslinmuhammad safetyandfeasibilitystudyofusingpolyphosphatepolypinalveolarcleftrepairapilotstudy