Cargando…
Antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention against Lyme disease following tick bite: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: In areas where Lyme disease is endemic, bites from ticks are common, but no vaccine is currently available against Lyme disease for humans. Therefore, the feasibility of using antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent Lyme disease after a tick bite is worth further exploration. Previous meta-ana...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8573889/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34749665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06837-7 |
_version_ | 1784595508775354368 |
---|---|
author | Zhou, Guozhong Xu, Xin Zhang, Yu Yue, Peng Luo, Shiqi Fan, Yuxin Chen, Jingjing Liu, Meixiao Dong, Yan Li, Bingxue Kong, Jing Wen, Shiyuan Liu, Aihua Bao, Fukai |
author_facet | Zhou, Guozhong Xu, Xin Zhang, Yu Yue, Peng Luo, Shiqi Fan, Yuxin Chen, Jingjing Liu, Meixiao Dong, Yan Li, Bingxue Kong, Jing Wen, Shiyuan Liu, Aihua Bao, Fukai |
author_sort | Zhou, Guozhong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In areas where Lyme disease is endemic, bites from ticks are common, but no vaccine is currently available against Lyme disease for humans. Therefore, the feasibility of using antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent Lyme disease after a tick bite is worth further exploration. Previous meta-analyses lack sufficient power to demonstrate the efficacy of about antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of Lyme disease following a tick bite. In this study, we explored more precise evidence and attempted to identify and update optimum treatment strategies. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for studies until March 23, 2021. We included studies if the enrolled patients were randomly allocated to a treatment or control group within 72 h following a tick bite and had no clinical evidence of Lyme disease at enrolment. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines were followed for data abstraction. Two authors (GZZ and XX) independently reviewed the abstracts and identified articles for detailed assessment. We used a random-effects model to calculate the pooled results and reported the 95% confidence interval (CI). Study quality was assessed using a modified Jadad scale, and publication bias was assessed using Egger’s test. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) for the rates of unfavorable events in patients who received intervention versus the control group. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42021245002. RESULTS: Six studies (3,766 individuals) were included. The pooled rate of unfavorable events in persons receiving treatment and the control group were 0.4% (95%CI: 0.1–1.1%) and 2.2% (95%CI: 1.6–3.0%), respectively. The pooled RR was 0.38 (95%CI: 0.22–0.66). Subgroup analysis revealed that the pooled RR was 0.29 (95%CI: 0.14–0.60) in the single-use 200-mg doxycycline group; 0.28 (95%CI: 0.05–1.67) in a 10-day course group (Amoxicillin, Penicillin or tetracycline); and 0.73 (95%CI: 0.25–2.08) in a topical antibiotic treatment group (Azithromycin). CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence supports the use of antibiotics for the prevention of Lyme disease, and reveals advantages of using single-dose; however, further confirmation is needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8573889 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85738892021-11-08 Antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention against Lyme disease following tick bite: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis Zhou, Guozhong Xu, Xin Zhang, Yu Yue, Peng Luo, Shiqi Fan, Yuxin Chen, Jingjing Liu, Meixiao Dong, Yan Li, Bingxue Kong, Jing Wen, Shiyuan Liu, Aihua Bao, Fukai BMC Infect Dis Research BACKGROUND: In areas where Lyme disease is endemic, bites from ticks are common, but no vaccine is currently available against Lyme disease for humans. Therefore, the feasibility of using antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent Lyme disease after a tick bite is worth further exploration. Previous meta-analyses lack sufficient power to demonstrate the efficacy of about antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of Lyme disease following a tick bite. In this study, we explored more precise evidence and attempted to identify and update optimum treatment strategies. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for studies until March 23, 2021. We included studies if the enrolled patients were randomly allocated to a treatment or control group within 72 h following a tick bite and had no clinical evidence of Lyme disease at enrolment. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines were followed for data abstraction. Two authors (GZZ and XX) independently reviewed the abstracts and identified articles for detailed assessment. We used a random-effects model to calculate the pooled results and reported the 95% confidence interval (CI). Study quality was assessed using a modified Jadad scale, and publication bias was assessed using Egger’s test. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) for the rates of unfavorable events in patients who received intervention versus the control group. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42021245002. RESULTS: Six studies (3,766 individuals) were included. The pooled rate of unfavorable events in persons receiving treatment and the control group were 0.4% (95%CI: 0.1–1.1%) and 2.2% (95%CI: 1.6–3.0%), respectively. The pooled RR was 0.38 (95%CI: 0.22–0.66). Subgroup analysis revealed that the pooled RR was 0.29 (95%CI: 0.14–0.60) in the single-use 200-mg doxycycline group; 0.28 (95%CI: 0.05–1.67) in a 10-day course group (Amoxicillin, Penicillin or tetracycline); and 0.73 (95%CI: 0.25–2.08) in a topical antibiotic treatment group (Azithromycin). CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence supports the use of antibiotics for the prevention of Lyme disease, and reveals advantages of using single-dose; however, further confirmation is needed. BioMed Central 2021-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8573889/ /pubmed/34749665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06837-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Zhou, Guozhong Xu, Xin Zhang, Yu Yue, Peng Luo, Shiqi Fan, Yuxin Chen, Jingjing Liu, Meixiao Dong, Yan Li, Bingxue Kong, Jing Wen, Shiyuan Liu, Aihua Bao, Fukai Antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention against Lyme disease following tick bite: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention against Lyme disease following tick bite: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention against Lyme disease following tick bite: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention against Lyme disease following tick bite: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention against Lyme disease following tick bite: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention against Lyme disease following tick bite: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention against lyme disease following tick bite: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8573889/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34749665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06837-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhouguozhong antibioticprophylaxisforpreventionagainstlymediseasefollowingtickbiteanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xuxin antibioticprophylaxisforpreventionagainstlymediseasefollowingtickbiteanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangyu antibioticprophylaxisforpreventionagainstlymediseasefollowingtickbiteanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yuepeng antibioticprophylaxisforpreventionagainstlymediseasefollowingtickbiteanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT luoshiqi antibioticprophylaxisforpreventionagainstlymediseasefollowingtickbiteanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT fanyuxin antibioticprophylaxisforpreventionagainstlymediseasefollowingtickbiteanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chenjingjing antibioticprophylaxisforpreventionagainstlymediseasefollowingtickbiteanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liumeixiao antibioticprophylaxisforpreventionagainstlymediseasefollowingtickbiteanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dongyan antibioticprophylaxisforpreventionagainstlymediseasefollowingtickbiteanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT libingxue antibioticprophylaxisforpreventionagainstlymediseasefollowingtickbiteanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kongjing antibioticprophylaxisforpreventionagainstlymediseasefollowingtickbiteanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wenshiyuan antibioticprophylaxisforpreventionagainstlymediseasefollowingtickbiteanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liuaihua antibioticprophylaxisforpreventionagainstlymediseasefollowingtickbiteanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT baofukai antibioticprophylaxisforpreventionagainstlymediseasefollowingtickbiteanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |