Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of point-of-care C-Reactive Protein test compared to current clinical practice as an intervention to improve antibiotic prescription in malaria-negative patients in Afghanistan

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global health problem requiring a reduction in inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. Point-of-Care C-Reactive Protein (POCCRP) tests could distinguish between bacterial and non-bacterial causes of fever in malaria-negative patients and thus reduce inap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dickinson, Simon, Yi Chong, Huey, Leslie, Toby, Rowland, Mark, Schultz Hansen, Kristian, Boyers, Dwayne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8575266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34748558
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258299
_version_ 1784595643064385536
author Dickinson, Simon
Yi Chong, Huey
Leslie, Toby
Rowland, Mark
Schultz Hansen, Kristian
Boyers, Dwayne
author_facet Dickinson, Simon
Yi Chong, Huey
Leslie, Toby
Rowland, Mark
Schultz Hansen, Kristian
Boyers, Dwayne
author_sort Dickinson, Simon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global health problem requiring a reduction in inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. Point-of-Care C-Reactive Protein (POCCRP) tests could distinguish between bacterial and non-bacterial causes of fever in malaria-negative patients and thus reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. However, the cost-effectiveness of POCCRP testing is unclear in low-income settings. METHODS: A decision tree model was used to estimate cost-effectiveness of POCCRP versus current clinical practice at primary healthcare facilities in Afghanistan. Data were analysed from healthcare delivery and societal perspectives. Costs were reported in 2019 USD. Effectiveness was measured as correctly treated febrile malaria-negative patient. Cost, effectiveness and diagnostic accuracy parameters were obtained from primary data from a cost-effectiveness study on malaria rapid diagnostic tests in Afghanistan and supplemented with POCCRP-specific data sourced from the literature. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) reported the additional cost per additional correctly treated febrile malaria-negative patient over a 28-day time horizon. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses examined the impact of uncertainty of parameter inputs. Scenario analysis included economic cost of AMR per antibiotic prescription. RESULTS: The model predicts that POCCRP intervention would result in 137 fewer antibiotic prescriptions (6%) with a 12% reduction (279 prescriptions) in inappropriate prescriptions compared to current clinical practice. ICERs were $14.33 (healthcare delivery), $11.40 (societal), and $9.78 (scenario analysis) per additional correctly treated case. CONCLUSIONS: POCCRP tests could improve antibiotic prescribing among malaria-negative patients in Afghanistan. Cost-effectiveness depends in part on willingness to pay for reductions in inappropriate antibiotic prescribing that will only have modest impact on immediate clinical outcomes but may have long-term benefits in reducing overuse of antibiotics. A reduction in the overuse of antibiotics is needed and POCCRP tests may add to other interventions in achieving this aim. Assessment of willingness to pay among policy makers and donors and undertaking operational trials will help determine cost-effectiveness and assist decision making.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8575266
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85752662021-11-09 Cost-effectiveness of point-of-care C-Reactive Protein test compared to current clinical practice as an intervention to improve antibiotic prescription in malaria-negative patients in Afghanistan Dickinson, Simon Yi Chong, Huey Leslie, Toby Rowland, Mark Schultz Hansen, Kristian Boyers, Dwayne PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global health problem requiring a reduction in inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. Point-of-Care C-Reactive Protein (POCCRP) tests could distinguish between bacterial and non-bacterial causes of fever in malaria-negative patients and thus reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. However, the cost-effectiveness of POCCRP testing is unclear in low-income settings. METHODS: A decision tree model was used to estimate cost-effectiveness of POCCRP versus current clinical practice at primary healthcare facilities in Afghanistan. Data were analysed from healthcare delivery and societal perspectives. Costs were reported in 2019 USD. Effectiveness was measured as correctly treated febrile malaria-negative patient. Cost, effectiveness and diagnostic accuracy parameters were obtained from primary data from a cost-effectiveness study on malaria rapid diagnostic tests in Afghanistan and supplemented with POCCRP-specific data sourced from the literature. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) reported the additional cost per additional correctly treated febrile malaria-negative patient over a 28-day time horizon. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses examined the impact of uncertainty of parameter inputs. Scenario analysis included economic cost of AMR per antibiotic prescription. RESULTS: The model predicts that POCCRP intervention would result in 137 fewer antibiotic prescriptions (6%) with a 12% reduction (279 prescriptions) in inappropriate prescriptions compared to current clinical practice. ICERs were $14.33 (healthcare delivery), $11.40 (societal), and $9.78 (scenario analysis) per additional correctly treated case. CONCLUSIONS: POCCRP tests could improve antibiotic prescribing among malaria-negative patients in Afghanistan. Cost-effectiveness depends in part on willingness to pay for reductions in inappropriate antibiotic prescribing that will only have modest impact on immediate clinical outcomes but may have long-term benefits in reducing overuse of antibiotics. A reduction in the overuse of antibiotics is needed and POCCRP tests may add to other interventions in achieving this aim. Assessment of willingness to pay among policy makers and donors and undertaking operational trials will help determine cost-effectiveness and assist decision making. Public Library of Science 2021-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8575266/ /pubmed/34748558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258299 Text en © 2021 Dickinson et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dickinson, Simon
Yi Chong, Huey
Leslie, Toby
Rowland, Mark
Schultz Hansen, Kristian
Boyers, Dwayne
Cost-effectiveness of point-of-care C-Reactive Protein test compared to current clinical practice as an intervention to improve antibiotic prescription in malaria-negative patients in Afghanistan
title Cost-effectiveness of point-of-care C-Reactive Protein test compared to current clinical practice as an intervention to improve antibiotic prescription in malaria-negative patients in Afghanistan
title_full Cost-effectiveness of point-of-care C-Reactive Protein test compared to current clinical practice as an intervention to improve antibiotic prescription in malaria-negative patients in Afghanistan
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of point-of-care C-Reactive Protein test compared to current clinical practice as an intervention to improve antibiotic prescription in malaria-negative patients in Afghanistan
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of point-of-care C-Reactive Protein test compared to current clinical practice as an intervention to improve antibiotic prescription in malaria-negative patients in Afghanistan
title_short Cost-effectiveness of point-of-care C-Reactive Protein test compared to current clinical practice as an intervention to improve antibiotic prescription in malaria-negative patients in Afghanistan
title_sort cost-effectiveness of point-of-care c-reactive protein test compared to current clinical practice as an intervention to improve antibiotic prescription in malaria-negative patients in afghanistan
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8575266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34748558
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258299
work_keys_str_mv AT dickinsonsimon costeffectivenessofpointofcarecreactiveproteintestcomparedtocurrentclinicalpracticeasaninterventiontoimproveantibioticprescriptioninmalarianegativepatientsinafghanistan
AT yichonghuey costeffectivenessofpointofcarecreactiveproteintestcomparedtocurrentclinicalpracticeasaninterventiontoimproveantibioticprescriptioninmalarianegativepatientsinafghanistan
AT leslietoby costeffectivenessofpointofcarecreactiveproteintestcomparedtocurrentclinicalpracticeasaninterventiontoimproveantibioticprescriptioninmalarianegativepatientsinafghanistan
AT rowlandmark costeffectivenessofpointofcarecreactiveproteintestcomparedtocurrentclinicalpracticeasaninterventiontoimproveantibioticprescriptioninmalarianegativepatientsinafghanistan
AT schultzhansenkristian costeffectivenessofpointofcarecreactiveproteintestcomparedtocurrentclinicalpracticeasaninterventiontoimproveantibioticprescriptioninmalarianegativepatientsinafghanistan
AT boyersdwayne costeffectivenessofpointofcarecreactiveproteintestcomparedtocurrentclinicalpracticeasaninterventiontoimproveantibioticprescriptioninmalarianegativepatientsinafghanistan