Cargando…

Modality differences in ERP components between somatosensory and auditory Go/No-go paradigms in prepubescent children

We investigated modality differences in the N2 and P3 components of event-related potentials (ERPs) between somatosensory and auditory Go/No-go paradigms in eighteen healthy prepubescent children (mean age: 125.9±4.2 months). We also evaluated the relationship between behavioral responses (reaction...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakata, Hiroki, Takezawa, Miho, Kamijo, Keita, Shibasaki, Manabu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8575285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34748591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259653
_version_ 1784595647579553792
author Nakata, Hiroki
Takezawa, Miho
Kamijo, Keita
Shibasaki, Manabu
author_facet Nakata, Hiroki
Takezawa, Miho
Kamijo, Keita
Shibasaki, Manabu
author_sort Nakata, Hiroki
collection PubMed
description We investigated modality differences in the N2 and P3 components of event-related potentials (ERPs) between somatosensory and auditory Go/No-go paradigms in eighteen healthy prepubescent children (mean age: 125.9±4.2 months). We also evaluated the relationship between behavioral responses (reaction time, reaction time variability, and omission and commission error rates) and amplitudes and latencies of N2 and P3 during somatosensory and auditory Go/No-go paradigms. The peak latency of No-go-N2 was significantly shorter than that of Go-N2 during somatosensory paradigms, but not during auditory paradigms. The peak amplitude of P3 was significantly larger during somatosensory than auditory paradigms, and the peak latency of P3 was significantly shorter during somatosensory than auditory paradigms. Correlations between behavioral responses and the P3 component were not found during somatosensory paradigms. On the other hand, in auditory paradigms, correlations were detected between the reaction time and peak amplitude of No-go-P3, and between the reaction time variability and peak latency of No-go-P3. A correlation was noted between commission error and the peak latency of No-go-N2 during somatosensory paradigms. Compared with previous adult studies using both somatosensory and auditory Go/No-go paradigms, the relationships between behavioral responses and ERP components would be weak in prepubescent children. Our data provide findings to advance understanding of the neural development of motor execution and inhibition processing, that is dependent on or independent of the stimulus modality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8575285
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85752852021-11-09 Modality differences in ERP components between somatosensory and auditory Go/No-go paradigms in prepubescent children Nakata, Hiroki Takezawa, Miho Kamijo, Keita Shibasaki, Manabu PLoS One Research Article We investigated modality differences in the N2 and P3 components of event-related potentials (ERPs) between somatosensory and auditory Go/No-go paradigms in eighteen healthy prepubescent children (mean age: 125.9±4.2 months). We also evaluated the relationship between behavioral responses (reaction time, reaction time variability, and omission and commission error rates) and amplitudes and latencies of N2 and P3 during somatosensory and auditory Go/No-go paradigms. The peak latency of No-go-N2 was significantly shorter than that of Go-N2 during somatosensory paradigms, but not during auditory paradigms. The peak amplitude of P3 was significantly larger during somatosensory than auditory paradigms, and the peak latency of P3 was significantly shorter during somatosensory than auditory paradigms. Correlations between behavioral responses and the P3 component were not found during somatosensory paradigms. On the other hand, in auditory paradigms, correlations were detected between the reaction time and peak amplitude of No-go-P3, and between the reaction time variability and peak latency of No-go-P3. A correlation was noted between commission error and the peak latency of No-go-N2 during somatosensory paradigms. Compared with previous adult studies using both somatosensory and auditory Go/No-go paradigms, the relationships between behavioral responses and ERP components would be weak in prepubescent children. Our data provide findings to advance understanding of the neural development of motor execution and inhibition processing, that is dependent on or independent of the stimulus modality. Public Library of Science 2021-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8575285/ /pubmed/34748591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259653 Text en © 2021 Nakata et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nakata, Hiroki
Takezawa, Miho
Kamijo, Keita
Shibasaki, Manabu
Modality differences in ERP components between somatosensory and auditory Go/No-go paradigms in prepubescent children
title Modality differences in ERP components between somatosensory and auditory Go/No-go paradigms in prepubescent children
title_full Modality differences in ERP components between somatosensory and auditory Go/No-go paradigms in prepubescent children
title_fullStr Modality differences in ERP components between somatosensory and auditory Go/No-go paradigms in prepubescent children
title_full_unstemmed Modality differences in ERP components between somatosensory and auditory Go/No-go paradigms in prepubescent children
title_short Modality differences in ERP components between somatosensory and auditory Go/No-go paradigms in prepubescent children
title_sort modality differences in erp components between somatosensory and auditory go/no-go paradigms in prepubescent children
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8575285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34748591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259653
work_keys_str_mv AT nakatahiroki modalitydifferencesinerpcomponentsbetweensomatosensoryandauditorygonogoparadigmsinprepubescentchildren
AT takezawamiho modalitydifferencesinerpcomponentsbetweensomatosensoryandauditorygonogoparadigmsinprepubescentchildren
AT kamijokeita modalitydifferencesinerpcomponentsbetweensomatosensoryandauditorygonogoparadigmsinprepubescentchildren
AT shibasakimanabu modalitydifferencesinerpcomponentsbetweensomatosensoryandauditorygonogoparadigmsinprepubescentchildren