Cargando…

Analysis of Emergency Department Utilization in Medicaid Expansion and Non-expansion States

Introduction The Affordable Care Act has been debated since its initial enactment over a decade ago. One of the primary topics for discussion has been Medicaid expansion, which has created a schism across the United States. The effects of Medicaid expansion largely remain unclear. The purpose of thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lall, Ashley, Devereaux, Randolph, Flynn, Mike, Vandever, Christian, Tomsky-Jackson, Krystal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8575320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34765344
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18561
_version_ 1784595655543488512
author Lall, Ashley
Devereaux, Randolph
Flynn, Mike
Vandever, Christian
Tomsky-Jackson, Krystal
author_facet Lall, Ashley
Devereaux, Randolph
Flynn, Mike
Vandever, Christian
Tomsky-Jackson, Krystal
author_sort Lall, Ashley
collection PubMed
description Introduction The Affordable Care Act has been debated since its initial enactment over a decade ago. One of the primary topics for discussion has been Medicaid expansion, which has created a schism across the United States. The effects of Medicaid expansion largely remain unclear. The purpose of this report is to elucidate how Medicaid expansion has impacted emergency department (ED) utilization by analyzing Medicaid expansion and non-expansion states to determine who visited the ED and the reason for the visit. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis using de-identified electronic medical record (EMR) data from 56,423 patients and 33 different hospitals (18 Medicaid non-expansion and 15 Medicaid expansion) who visited the ED in 2019. We used geographical demographics and insurance status to categorize patients who visited the ED and ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC) to identify the reasons for the visit. Logistic regression and chi-square analysis were used to analyze the data. Results We observed a significant relationship between Medicaid expansion and geographic region such that patients living in rural or semirural regions likely resided in Medicaid non-expansion states. Patients using self-pay were more likely to live in a Medicaid non-expansion state than a Medicaid expansion state (32.3% vs. 21.5%, p-value < 0.0001). Finally, there were no significant differences between the top five ACSC for Medicaid expansion and Medicaid non-expansion states but living in an expansion state was significantly (p < 0.01) related to being diagnosed with an ACSC (OR, 1.056; 95% CI, 1.013-1.100). Conclusion In conclusion, Medicaid expansion was associated with differences in the use of medical resources. Patients using Medicaid insurance who reside in Medicaid expansion states preferentially use the ED. Geographical location does play a role in ED utilization and ambulatory care sensitive condition diagnoses in patients. Despite these findings, the full effects of Medicaid expansion on ED utilization require further investigation. However, our research indicates that Medicaid expansion is not the singular solution in decreasing ED utilization and healthcare costs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8575320
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85753202021-11-10 Analysis of Emergency Department Utilization in Medicaid Expansion and Non-expansion States Lall, Ashley Devereaux, Randolph Flynn, Mike Vandever, Christian Tomsky-Jackson, Krystal Cureus Emergency Medicine Introduction The Affordable Care Act has been debated since its initial enactment over a decade ago. One of the primary topics for discussion has been Medicaid expansion, which has created a schism across the United States. The effects of Medicaid expansion largely remain unclear. The purpose of this report is to elucidate how Medicaid expansion has impacted emergency department (ED) utilization by analyzing Medicaid expansion and non-expansion states to determine who visited the ED and the reason for the visit. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis using de-identified electronic medical record (EMR) data from 56,423 patients and 33 different hospitals (18 Medicaid non-expansion and 15 Medicaid expansion) who visited the ED in 2019. We used geographical demographics and insurance status to categorize patients who visited the ED and ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC) to identify the reasons for the visit. Logistic regression and chi-square analysis were used to analyze the data. Results We observed a significant relationship between Medicaid expansion and geographic region such that patients living in rural or semirural regions likely resided in Medicaid non-expansion states. Patients using self-pay were more likely to live in a Medicaid non-expansion state than a Medicaid expansion state (32.3% vs. 21.5%, p-value < 0.0001). Finally, there were no significant differences between the top five ACSC for Medicaid expansion and Medicaid non-expansion states but living in an expansion state was significantly (p < 0.01) related to being diagnosed with an ACSC (OR, 1.056; 95% CI, 1.013-1.100). Conclusion In conclusion, Medicaid expansion was associated with differences in the use of medical resources. Patients using Medicaid insurance who reside in Medicaid expansion states preferentially use the ED. Geographical location does play a role in ED utilization and ambulatory care sensitive condition diagnoses in patients. Despite these findings, the full effects of Medicaid expansion on ED utilization require further investigation. However, our research indicates that Medicaid expansion is not the singular solution in decreasing ED utilization and healthcare costs. Cureus 2021-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8575320/ /pubmed/34765344 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18561 Text en Copyright © 2021, Lall et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Emergency Medicine
Lall, Ashley
Devereaux, Randolph
Flynn, Mike
Vandever, Christian
Tomsky-Jackson, Krystal
Analysis of Emergency Department Utilization in Medicaid Expansion and Non-expansion States
title Analysis of Emergency Department Utilization in Medicaid Expansion and Non-expansion States
title_full Analysis of Emergency Department Utilization in Medicaid Expansion and Non-expansion States
title_fullStr Analysis of Emergency Department Utilization in Medicaid Expansion and Non-expansion States
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Emergency Department Utilization in Medicaid Expansion and Non-expansion States
title_short Analysis of Emergency Department Utilization in Medicaid Expansion and Non-expansion States
title_sort analysis of emergency department utilization in medicaid expansion and non-expansion states
topic Emergency Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8575320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34765344
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18561
work_keys_str_mv AT lallashley analysisofemergencydepartmentutilizationinmedicaidexpansionandnonexpansionstates
AT devereauxrandolph analysisofemergencydepartmentutilizationinmedicaidexpansionandnonexpansionstates
AT flynnmike analysisofemergencydepartmentutilizationinmedicaidexpansionandnonexpansionstates
AT vandeverchristian analysisofemergencydepartmentutilizationinmedicaidexpansionandnonexpansionstates
AT tomskyjacksonkrystal analysisofemergencydepartmentutilizationinmedicaidexpansionandnonexpansionstates