Cargando…
Heuristic estimation of the α/β ratio for a cohort of Mexican patients with prostate cancer treated with external radiotherapy techniques
BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to Estimate and compare the radiobiological ratio α/β with the heuristic method for a cohort of Mexican patients with prostate cancer (PCa) who were treated with external radiotherapy (RT) techniques at three Hospital Institutions in Mexico City. With the Kaplan-...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Via Medica
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8575352/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34760302 http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2021.0081 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to Estimate and compare the radiobiological ratio α/β with the heuristic method for a cohort of Mexican patients with prostate cancer (PCa) who were treated with external radiotherapy (RT) techniques at three Hospital Institutions in Mexico City. With the Kaplan-Meier technique and the Cox proportional hazards model, the biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) is determined and characterized for cohorts of Mexican patients with PCa who received treatment with external RT. Using these clinical outcomes, the radiobiological parameter α/β is determined using the heuristic methodology of Pedicini et. al. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The α/β is calculated from the survival curves for different treatment schemes implemented at three distinct hospitals. The Pedicini’s techniques allow to determine the parameters α/β, k and N(0) when treatments are not radiobiologically equivalent, therefore, are built up of a set of curved pairs for the biologically effective dose (BED) versus the ratio α/β, where the ratio is given by the intersection for each pair of curves. RESULTS: Six different values of α/β were found: the first α/β = 2.46 Gy, the second α/β = 3.30 Gy, the third for α/β = 3.25 Gy, the fourth α/β = 3.24 Gy, the fifth α/β = 3.38 Gy and the last α/β = 4.08 Gy. These values can be explained as follows: a) The bRFS of the schemes presents a statistical variation; b) The absorbed doses given to the patient present uncertainties on the physical dosimetry that are not on the modeling; c) Finally, in the model for the bRFS of Eq. (3), there are parameters that have to be considered, such as: the number of clonogenic tumor cells N(0), the overall treatment time (OTT), the kick-off time for tumor repopulation T(k) and the repopulation doubling time. Therefore, the mean value to α/β for all schemes has an average value of 3.29 (± 0.52) Gy. CONCLUSIONS: The value of [Formula: see text] is determined from cohorts of Mexican patients with PC a treated with external radiotherapy using the time-dependent LQ model, which is a higher value with respect to the “dogma” value of α/β 1.5 Gy obtained with the LQ model without temporal dependence. Therefore, there is a possibility of optimizing treatments radiobiologically and improving the results of bRFS in Mexican patients with PCa treated with external radiotherapy. |
---|