Cargando…

The LabBM score is an excellent survival prediction tool in patients undergoing palliative radiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The prognostic assessment of patients referred for palliative radiotherapy can be conducted by site-specific scores. A quick assessment that would cover the whole spectrum could simplify the working day of clinicians who are not specialists for a particular disease site. This stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nieder, Carsten, Dalhaug, Astrid, Haukland, Ellinor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Via Medica 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8575363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34760308
http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2021.0096
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND AIM: The prognostic assessment of patients referred for palliative radiotherapy can be conducted by site-specific scores. A quick assessment that would cover the whole spectrum could simplify the working day of clinicians who are not specialists for a particular disease site. This study evaluated a promising score, the LabBM (validated for brain metastases), in patients treated for other indications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The LabBM score was calculated in 375 patients by assigning 1 point each for C-reactive protein and lactate dehydrogenase above the upper limit of normal, and 0.5 points each for hemoglobin, platelets and albumin below the lower limit of normal. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: Median overall survival gradually decreased with increasing point sum (range 25.1–1.1 months). When grouped according to the original three-tiered model, excellent discrimination was found. Patients with 0–1 points had a median survival of 15.7 months. Those with 1.5–2 points had a median survival of 5.8 months. Finally, those with 2.5–3.5 points had a median survival of 3.2 months (all p-values ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION: The LabBM score, which is derived from inexpensive blood tests and easy to use, stratified patients into three very distinct prognostic groups and deserves further validation.