Cargando…

Penile implant infection factors: a contemporary narrative review of literature

OBJECTIVE: We aim to review and summarize published literature that features implanted penile devices and details infection of these devices as a complication. In particular, we will detail the factors that influence infection of penile implants. BACKGROUND: Types of penile prostheses (PP) include i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baird, Bryce A., Parikh, Kevin, Broderick, Gregory
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8575569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34804829
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-21-568
_version_ 1784595700210728960
author Baird, Bryce A.
Parikh, Kevin
Broderick, Gregory
author_facet Baird, Bryce A.
Parikh, Kevin
Broderick, Gregory
author_sort Baird, Bryce A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We aim to review and summarize published literature that features implanted penile devices and details infection of these devices as a complication. In particular, we will detail the factors that influence infection of penile implants. BACKGROUND: Types of penile prostheses (PP) include inflatable implants and semirigid implants; these are utilized for treatment of erectile dysfunction. Likely the most feared complication of penile implants is infection. There are a handful of factors that are implicated in device infection. METHODS: Searches were performed using MEDLINE and PubMed databases using keywords and phrases ‘penile implant AND infection’; ‘penile prosthesis AND infection’; ‘penile implant infection’. We have presented results from our literature search. We divided these into ‘Surgical Elements’ and ‘Patient Selection and Factors.’ Each topic is discussed in its own section. CONCLUSIONS: Strides have been made since the initial penile prosthesis (IPP) surgeries to improve infection rates including diabetes control, antibiotic coating of devices, and antibiotic implementation. Going forward, more studies, especially randomized control trials, need to focus on defining levels of diabetic control (sugar control and A1C control), determining the role of metabolic syndrome in infection promotion and determining laboratory values which could be predictive of infection. We present a discussion of important factors to consider in the realm of PP infections. In addition, we include studies which discuss topics for future directions in decreasing the number of infections seen with PP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8575569
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85755692021-11-18 Penile implant infection factors: a contemporary narrative review of literature Baird, Bryce A. Parikh, Kevin Broderick, Gregory Transl Androl Urol Review Article OBJECTIVE: We aim to review and summarize published literature that features implanted penile devices and details infection of these devices as a complication. In particular, we will detail the factors that influence infection of penile implants. BACKGROUND: Types of penile prostheses (PP) include inflatable implants and semirigid implants; these are utilized for treatment of erectile dysfunction. Likely the most feared complication of penile implants is infection. There are a handful of factors that are implicated in device infection. METHODS: Searches were performed using MEDLINE and PubMed databases using keywords and phrases ‘penile implant AND infection’; ‘penile prosthesis AND infection’; ‘penile implant infection’. We have presented results from our literature search. We divided these into ‘Surgical Elements’ and ‘Patient Selection and Factors.’ Each topic is discussed in its own section. CONCLUSIONS: Strides have been made since the initial penile prosthesis (IPP) surgeries to improve infection rates including diabetes control, antibiotic coating of devices, and antibiotic implementation. Going forward, more studies, especially randomized control trials, need to focus on defining levels of diabetic control (sugar control and A1C control), determining the role of metabolic syndrome in infection promotion and determining laboratory values which could be predictive of infection. We present a discussion of important factors to consider in the realm of PP infections. In addition, we include studies which discuss topics for future directions in decreasing the number of infections seen with PP. AME Publishing Company 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8575569/ /pubmed/34804829 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-21-568 Text en 2021 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Baird, Bryce A.
Parikh, Kevin
Broderick, Gregory
Penile implant infection factors: a contemporary narrative review of literature
title Penile implant infection factors: a contemporary narrative review of literature
title_full Penile implant infection factors: a contemporary narrative review of literature
title_fullStr Penile implant infection factors: a contemporary narrative review of literature
title_full_unstemmed Penile implant infection factors: a contemporary narrative review of literature
title_short Penile implant infection factors: a contemporary narrative review of literature
title_sort penile implant infection factors: a contemporary narrative review of literature
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8575569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34804829
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-21-568
work_keys_str_mv AT bairdbrycea penileimplantinfectionfactorsacontemporarynarrativereviewofliterature
AT parikhkevin penileimplantinfectionfactorsacontemporarynarrativereviewofliterature
AT broderickgregory penileimplantinfectionfactorsacontemporarynarrativereviewofliterature